Summary of the Development of Anthropological Theory from the XIX century to the Present XXI century

2659 Words6 Pages

(Introductory Paragraph: Containing Thesis)
Since the beginning of the human species, humans have possessed an undying curiosity with their entire existence and surroundings. These curious obsessions, including that of their environments and other living organisms, have never been as strong, remarkable and lasting as the curiosity we’ve had about ourselves both collectively and individually. Two anthropologists offer the valid idea that “it is probably fair to say, wherever literate civilizations came into contact with members of different societies, something like ethnographic writing occurred” (McGee, Warms, 2012). It also seems to be plausible, even looking as far back into the human origin and history as Homo neanderthalensis, that the first glimmer of curiosity occur. Of course Homo neanderthalensis would not be writing ethnographies detailing the emic and etic perspectives within and about a culture, but since they are believed to have lived in complex groups and would occasionally pass another group or merge with another group in passing it would seem reasonable to assume that a base curiosity must have been piqued. All ideas, whether valid or not, begin with a thought. The field of anthropology is a rich transformation and amalgamation of ideas, thoughts and theories evolving throughout time. The purpose of this essay is to summarize the development of anthropological theory from the late nineteenth century to the present twenty-first century.
The concept of Degeneratism was a widely popular theory spanning from the Renaissance to the early nineteenth century. Degeneratism is “a biblical based explanation of cultural diversity… [where] prior to the destruction of the Tower of Babel, all people belonged to God. Whe...

... middle of paper ...

...to determine where the field of anthropology is headed in the future, but I don’t. A famous Greek philosopher once said, “the only constant is change” (Heraclitus). It is certain that he was correct, and that in the field of anthropology the only certainty we have of the field is that its concepts and methods will change with time. It is up to future anthropologists to discover and determine what anthropology will become, and what will be studied by future generations, beyond them, when they study the next link in the long chain of the history of anthropological theory.

Bibliography
Feder, Kenneth L. "Encountering the Past." The Past In Perspective: An Introduction to Human Prehistory. 6th ed. New York: Oxford UP, 2012. 2-23. Print.
McGee, Jon R., and Richard L. Warms. Anthropological Theory: An Introductory History. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012. Print.

Open Document