In the article, “Why Video games can never be art”, Ebert makes it clear that he strongly sticks by the his opinion that video games are not art. Ebert starts his article off by referring to a TED talk by Kellee Santiago where she states that video games are art but no one has been able to find a game that is even eligible to be compared on the same level as work from novelists or poets (Ebert). She continues by comparing video games and chicken scratches from cave drawing saying the two were on the same level but as they evolved they turned into an art form, helping Ebert’s point. As the drawings progressed and were being called art questions arose over whether sports should be considered art too. Some definitions say that art is appealing …show more content…
Ebert believes that video games are not a form of art because they do not have the same characteristics such as rules and objectives compared to plays or films which are considered art. In addition, he adds that video games are not art because they result in a winner, unlike books and plays, which have climaxes and storylines in which they follow, which is one of Ebert’s main points (Chayka). Ebert believes that no video game is worth playing because they are and will never be considered an art form. In response to that the author argues that video games follow a storyline in order to win the game much like a book. Video games can offer just as much realization, experiences, and fantasy, for instance, “ Super Mario 64 is as much of a world to me as that created in The Godfather, with as much directorial vision as Coppola (Chayka).” Personally Chayka believes that a video game like Super Mario can be held up to the same standards as some books. Chayka believes that video games are more than just games, they have many of the same characteristics that books or films have. Chayka emphasized that Ebert failed to compare video games to art and should take into consideration how video games measure up to
It is often believed that children are better off spending more time reading books and less time zoning out in front of their video games. People claim that video games sanction and promote aggression and violent responses to conflict; and that most games are an immense waste of time. Steven Johnson, the author of “Why Games Are Good for You,” appreciates the virtues of reading books, but argues that playing video games may not be a complete waste of time. His purpose for writing this essay is to explain the impact of cybertechnology on human perception and communication, in which he defends the value of computer games. In his essay, Johnson fluctuates between the pros and cons of reading versus gaming to appeal to skeptics who believe video
He claims that, “They taught me how to tell stories, create worlds and even how to save and spend money.” Different games can provide different sets of values that children can pick up. Bergman conveys that because of video games, he found his career path, which is programming, and that is how he ended up where he is today. Bergman’s use of his own family and lightening the constraints was a good example. But, it was only good for his family.
The author primarily appeals to the audience using logos. He brings statistics and data from research studies throughout the essay. He either provides background information on why the studies are misleading or just presents a fact. For instance, “According to a 2001 U.S. Surgeon General 's report, the strongest risk factors for school shootings centered on mental stability and the quality of home life, not media exposure” (Jenkins, “Reality Bytes: Eight Myths About Video Games Debunked”). He provides data like this through the essay. He is strongly trying to appeal to the audience’s sense of logic and
Tavinor’s article argues that video games should be categorized as art. He outlines competition as one of the reasons that people to object to including games as an art form. However, competing does not take away from the aesthetic value of the game, and like Tavenor stated, if someone were to submit a poem into a contest no one would think twice about considering that art. When does competition start? If someone makes a painting with an intent to make something prettier than their brother has, would that be considered art? I think that competition is not a factor. There are marvelous aesthetics in Spec Ops that I doubt anyone can not call art if they have seen the game. Art has a long history of breaking through molds and forcing people to see concepts differently. Spec Ops broke the mold of what I assumed war video games could be and made me see the complexity of war differently. It made me asks questions I never thought to produce before, which I think is one of the most valuable aspects of art. As The New Art of Video Games states, these works engage with their audiences differently by using a narrative and letting their decisions change the outcomes. It may be a unique form of art because of its roots in technology, but that is no reason to reject it. One question did stick with me as a result of playing this game. At the end, a soldier asked how we survived
In pages 20-24 of Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World, I agree that there are many different video games. For me, I am a fan of single-player games with story modes because I can play by myself and go at a pace that suits me. However, I enjoy playing online multiplayer when I have friends I can play with because it is fun interacting with friends and doing stuff together. I play on a console or my computer, but I have played on my phone and a hand-held device. I have not played a board game or card game in a while, but I would play it if the opportunity presents itself. The video games genres I play are sports, action, and adventure. I agree with Jane McGonigal that video games share four defining traits,
In the essay “Who Framed Roger Ebert?” (291), Rich Stanton explains Roger Ebert’s comments on video games and why he himself considers video games to be a form of art. He establishes that the comments made by Roger Ebert are opposing the idea that video games are a form of art. Then he gives examples of others that either agree with Ebert and believe that video games are not a form of art or disagree with Ebert and believe that games are indeed a form of art. Stanton believes that there are many problems with Ebert’s arguments and finishes with “It's bunk - Ebert doesn't know about games, which is fine, and there this should have ended” (292). He goes on to describe the amount of reaction from Ebert’s comments many from games media outlets
Video games have become a hot topic recently. There have been a lot of controversy over whether to play or not to play. The controversy is due to them being arguably more captivating than all other forms of entertainment. Video games narrate an epic tale like no other form of entertainment can. You can become immersed in video games, because of this they are both a highly entertaining escape from the real world and a complete waste of time.
Roger Ebert was a famous movie critic from the later twentieth century and early twenty-first century. According to www.thefamouspeople.com, Ebert started his career with Chicago Sun-Times Newspaper and worked there until death. In his time he was a writer, Ebert wrote the article, “Video Games Can Never Be Art,” in which he gives us the basic response to questions asked to him early on that video games are childish and simply cannot be considered art. While many may agree with Ebert, his argument is invalid. Video games, to me, should be considered art because they introduced me to the art of graphics at a young age, they are an artform in the eyes of the law, and have been displayed in an actual art museum in the United States.
3. “Video Games” by Chris Jozefowics. Published by Gareth Stevens Publishing 2010. Pleasantville, NY 10570-70000 USA. Produced by Editorials Directions Inc.
In the video game Enter the Matrix, released in 2003, the players take on the role of supporting characters in the film sequel Matrix Reloaded. They play the side stories; those that not appear on screen in the film. The game is inspired by the world that is depicted in the film. Enter the Matrix displays distinct visual parallel between the film and the video game. The overlook of the film and video game is similar and distinguishable because the video game mimics the visual style of the film. It gets players satisfied with their purchase of the game. Playing the game is a different experience for the players because it connects them with the source material. It allows them to be part of the story and to feel to be the character of their franchise. Players are considered spectators too because there are some cinematic cut scenes that are shown in the game which makes them observe and do n...
Video games are no longer the uprising form of media that ill informed parents and scientists used to fear; video games are now an established form of entertainment that is just as universally accepted as film or literature. The difference between videogames and mediums like film and literature is that they do not have the higher value that books have in exercising the mind and communicating information, nor do they have the value that films have to intellectually challenge an audience and to make people think. This is the general argument that can be heard voiced by leading intellectuals in various field as well as parents who are rising young children; both claim that videogames
We should develop games that people want to spend time on that are also educational, increasing the attention span of people, visual acuity, and multitasking abilities of all generations. The author very effectively portrays her message of by connecting with her audience charismatically, visually, personally, and logically. In the age of technology we must come to terms with the changing hobbies and daily activities around us. Rather than passing them off as bad campaigning for them to be cut back, censored, we should be focusing on the good that is already done by video games and how we could continue to improve
I’ve been a short Italian plumber who goes through endless trials in the search and rescue of his love, I have been a Lady of Luminosity who with her light-based magic defends her city of Demacia against the hostile Noxian forces and their allies. I have even been Batman, where I struggled through psychedelic educing trials. It all means something; it is very real when the player becomes attached to a character as one does in a traditional written format. Roger Ebert would argue that these kinds of experiences aren’t real or don’t mean anything. In a published post done by him and the Chicago Sun-Times blog, he argues that “Video games can never be art”. Robert Ebert claims video games don’t fulfill his definition of art. Because video games have objectives and can be “won” it doesn’t align with the traditional forms of art, such as novels, or a play; “things you cannot win; only experience them.” Ebert also said “art grows better the more it improves or alters nature through a passage through what we might call the artist’s soul, or
Video game have been claimed as addictive, a waste of time, and a distraction. While this does apply to some people, others have found the benefits to playing video games. These benefits include simulating working environments, helping people escape working environments, and giving great experiences. Although these benefits seems to be beneficial, it still stands that video games are a waste of time in which other things can be more productive.
Movies and video games today, play a significant role in shaping the attitudes, thoughts, and beliefs of society. In terms of being more influential on its particular audience, video games are a much more potent medium of entertainment than movies for a variety of reasons. The influence video games have on their participant are very obvious and overwhelming. Study’s concur the overall impact of video games on their audience is substantial when comparing them to movies. Video games have a substantial influence on its audience because video games are increasing violent behavior of the player, contain more violent content and a deeper complex plot, and video games require a much deeper lever of engagement of the player.