Summary Of The Omnivore's Dilemma By Michael Pollan

6082 Words13 Pages

Caroline Bamberger
AP Environmental Science
Mr. Engelmann
8 August 2015

APES Summer Assignment: The Omnivore’s Dilemma by Michael Pollan
Introduction- “Our National Eating Disorder”
The Omnivore’s Dilemma opens with Michael Pollan posing the question: “What should we have for dinner?”(1) He uses this question to demonstrate his belief that Americans are no longer able to make that decision for themselves. Instead, they must turn to experts to tell them what the best option is and journalists to uncover where it came from.
Pollan points out how in 2002, almost overnight, Americans developed a “carbophobia.” While previously, red meat had been the food to avoid, bread and pasta took over that roll with the sudden resurgence of the Atkins diet. …show more content…

In recent history, farming in America has changed dramatically, and Naylor’s farm is representative of many in the American Corn Belt. Though it began growing a variety of crops and keeping livestock too, Naylor now only plants corn and soybeans. In Naylor’s grandfather’s days, the farm fed the whole family with just enough left over for twelve others. Now, Naylor indirectly feeds an estimated 129 people, but this does not mean his farm is any more successful. In fact, Naylor’s farm cannot financially support his family. Corn took over American farmlands at the end of World War II, when a new synthetic fertilizer was introduced and manufactured by former munitions factories. It allowed for the elimination of crop rotation, leading to the switch from family farms to the corn monoculture. Economically, this system seems to make more sense, but it destroyed the once sustainable, sun-driven fertility cycle. Now, farmers are trapped into making more and more corn by government policy. As the abundance of the crop causes prices to fall, farmers must plant even more in order to make ends meet, surviving off constantly decreasing government subsidies. What’s worse is that the New Deal system that allowed corn farmers to stay afloat has since been dismantled in an effort to lower food prices and increase production without considering the farmers …show more content…

With such a variety of options from every climate and location, it is hard to determine what to eat and even what you can eat, a problem not faced by species like the koala which eat one thing almost exclusively. Humans have benefitted from this in many ways as well. For one thing, we evolved larger brains and better cognitive ability in order to determine and remember what is safe to eat. Humans also have a complex sense of taste that allows us to determine what foods have a high energy content (sweet things) and what may be poisonous (disgusting or bitter things). Since humans began to cook, we have expanded our options by broadening the spectrum of edible things. Cooking opens the door to otherwise inedible substances because it breaks things down and often neutralizes toxins. This has only worsened the omnivore’s dilemma as it adds more options to what you can eat, thereby making the question of what you should eat harder to answer. Food culture and traditions such as those heavily present in countries like Italy and France solve this problem by creating guidelines to help navigate this issue. In Pollan’s eyes, America’s issue is that it lacks any sort of food culture because it is so young and is made up of a wide variety of people. This lack of cultural guidance makes us susceptible to “national eating disorders” like fad diets. People are willing and able to rapidly

Open Document