Summary Of The Complexity Of War In The Things They Carried

822 Words2 Pages

Tim O 'Brien 's 1986 “The Things They Carried,” tells a story of how impactful war can be. It describes the struggle of overcoming grief and the struggle to deal with death; it shows the human side of war. The passage above provides an excellent example of the way O 'Brien uses first person narration to explain the complexity of war. In particular, the real meaning of “The Things They Carried” is revealed, because they show the actual burden the soldiers carried was not materialistic, but emotionally, “They carried all the emotional baggage of men who might die. Grief, terror, love,” (O’Brien 608). The author begins the paragraph of this short story with, “They carried all the emotional baggage of men who might die” (O’Brien 608). The soldiers seem to be terrified of causing the death of someone else than they are of dying themselves. At the beginning of the short story, O’Brien outlines all of the items the soldiers carry physically, including their “emotional baggage”. For some of the soldiers, their “emotional baggage” might be things they left postponed back at home, such as Lieutenant Jimmy Cross’s love for Martha. However, for others, their “emotional baggage” might become much heavier from the things they endure and experience through the battles of the war. Also, the narrator proceeds to list the intangible emotions he and his men carry. …show more content…

The real meaning of the things they carry is revealed in this paragraph because it lists off many of the intangible burden the soldier “hump” through their experience, and maybe their entire life. In contrast, the soldiers avoid to be seen as cowards, but, who is the coward. Is it the one who goes to war, or is it the one who goes because they are afraid of what other may think of him if he doesn 't. Can it also be the one who decides not to fight because he 's afraid of

Open Document