The reason why drug testings cons overweight the pros is because first, the students live in fear. School staffs are also in fear as well however, they are in fear that their students are using drugs at a younger age. A majority of middle school students do not take drugs. They are in the process of molding themselves. Why chase them down to take a drug test that will not be positive?
First, tests don’t fully measure all important aspects of education, and second, tests only measure small parts of students ' knowledge (Philp Harris). Standardized testing cannot truly measure achievement correctly because there are no specific rules to what achievement really consists of and can only measure small parts of knowledge because of these inaccurate measures of knowledge students begin to feel anxious. There are many studies showing how testing causes high anxiety for students therefore causing a drop in performance when taking tests. Test taking can cause students to experience psychological issues that result in a failing grade on the test. Test anxiety can also affect the students` motivation to learn and because of this I believe the stakes for standardized testing should be
But this is not a reasonable solution whatsoever. Many more students are using and selling drugs as they roam around the campus, but will never be “caught” with such a fickle and illusive process. Random student drug testing is not a plausible solution for the drug problem in public schools; it is unreliable and it infringes on the lives of those students involved. Those who support random drug testing argue that the growing trend of drug testing a small population of students in a school is effective at attacking the drug abuse problem, because fewer students will use when there is an obvious consequence (Drug Testing in School Activities 2). They believe if a drug problem is identified early enough, there is a better chance for rehabilitation.
To say school is bad for children is extremely inaccurate, many children look forward to this as their safe haven. In John Holt 's essay “school is bad for children” he argues that school prevents children from learning what they want and that it enables their curiosity making them become passive learners I found myself disagreeing with his arguments. Holt proposes ideas to reform the school system to make it more favorable for children in which i do agree with partially. School is one of the many things children need to succeed; getting students to work together more efficiently is great but taking students out of the school to learn along with removing compulsory school attendance and required curriculum is not the answer. More one on one
However, it had no positive effect on the children themselves or on the education they were receiving. All it taught the children was that inflicting harm on each other was an acceptable way to persuade them to get something done. Studies show that corporal punishment in schools have lasting negative effects on adolescents. Additionally, it interferes with the child’s academic progress, along with their goals in school. Children who are victim to corporal punishment usually have an increase of child aggression and antisocial behavior.
Schools are not doing all they can to have a true “Bully Free Zone”; moreover, they are going about it in the wrong way. Let us look at some of the ways schools are responding to the bullying issue. Zero Tolerance began as law calling for expulsion fo... ... middle of paper ... ...t more than physical traits. Typical victims tend to be timid, bashful, and lacking confidence in themselves. If an adult knows their child is being abused at school, they should contact the principal or person in charge immediately.
Finally, Holt believes the best thing for children is to eliminate school curriculum altogether. In my opinion, many schools have incorporated many of Holt’s solutions into their curriculum. However, Holt’s illustration of what he believes is a real student is in fact is biased, and often factually incorrect. He fails to see the importance of formal education and instead shames the system that helped lead him to get a degree at one of America’s finest universities. A formal education is a vital part of an independent society.
"Even though drug testing sounds good, based on the science, it is not working," said study author Daniel Romer, of the University of Pennsylvania Annenberg Public Policy Center in Philadelphia. "So as a prevention effort, school drug testing is kind of wrong-headed." Not only does the policy has no effect in deterring the drug use among young people, drug testing is also very expensive, it may steer students away from extracurricular activities, it can result in false positives which would result in the punishment of innocent students, and ultimately it can weaken the delicate trust and relationship between students and teachers. The very first national study conducted in a large scale on student drug testing revealed practically no variance in the rates of the drug usage between schools that has a drug testing policy and the schools that do not. Based on the research done between the years 1998 to 2001 among 76000 students in 8th, 10th, and 12th grades, the research established that drug testing did not have an influence on illicit drug usage among students as well as athletes (Yamaguch... ... middle of paper ... ..."Study: Drug Testing At School Doesn’t Work | TIME.com."
They could single them out for a bad grade. Random drug testing damages relationships. It could be parent-child or teacher-student. Drug testing young people when they are not actually suspected of using drugs sends the message to them that they are not to be trusted. Many students find that drug testing is very intolerable and intrusive on there privacy.
High Schooler, Lindsay Earls made the comment that “There were kids who dropped out of their extracurricular activities in protest, and this policy is driving ki... ... middle of paper ... ...uality education is very important. Drugs should not be a distraction amongst students learning. It would allow counselors to work with kids and make them familiar with the significance of drugs and the negative effects. Works Cited BRANDON, GARCIA. "High-School Sports: Stricter Drug-Testing Policy Proposed."