Summary Of Sacks The Man Who Mistook His Wife For A Hat

1267 Words3 Pages

Psychology is, at its simplest, easily defined as the scientific study of the human mind, behavior, and experience. When reading The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales, one cannot help but see the stories presented by Dr. Oliver Sacks, a clinical neurologist, are just as much psychological in nature as they are neurological. Sacks claims to be “equally interested in diseases and people” (p. vii) and seeks to share with the reader the “suffering, afflicted, fighting human subject” (p. viii). It is this identification with the person behind the disease that makes Sacks’ book meaningful from a psychological point of view. One could say Sacks is a physiological psychologist, concerned as he is with how the person, or mind, …show more content…

After rapidly and unexpectedly losing all ability to know where her limbs were without looking at them as well as her ability to speak, the woman spent a year in rehab learning how to control her vocal cords and to move on her own again. Sacks’ patient had lost her ability to perceive her body position, and despite her rehabilitation, she never regained that sense. Without using her eyes to see where her limbs were at any given moment, the woman would crumple into a heap like a lifeless doll. Although her body, like all others, has body-position sensors in her muscles, on her tendons, and in her joints (Kasschau, 1985, p, 205), the woman’s brain had either ceased to receive or ceased to interpret the signals sent from the sensors. Sacks not only helped to treat the woman’s physiological symptoms, but helped her to deal with the emotional aspect of her recovery, much as a clinical psychologist would. She was able to express her feelings about her struggle to recover, and Sacks took those feelings seriously enough to include in his tale. The woman’s case is an interesting one that merits further study by a physiological psychologist, but Sacks’ initial study opened that door to the …show more content…

Most appear to suffer from a form of receptive aphasia, in which they cannot understand the spoken word, but still manage to follow the meanings of the speaker through their interpretation of paralanguage and kinesics. Through just these forms of nonverbal communication, the patients in the tale were able to follow the president’s speech on television well enough to ken his disingenuousness. This is not surprising when Kasschau (1985) points out that up to 93% of the feeling behind a message may be communicated nonverbally (p. 322). Similarly, nearly 100 years earlier, Friedrich Nietzsche posited, “One can lie with the mouth, but with the accompanying grimace one nevertheless tells the truth” (as cited in Sacks, 1998, p. 82). Still others in the tale have tonal aphasia; they can understand the words spoken by others, but fail to pick up on any paralanguage. Even though they failed to perceive the president’s tone in the tale, they still managed to pick up on his deception by carefully studying his kinesics. The aphasiacs are a perfect study for the psycholinguist in Sacks as he watches how they make the most of their disease without letting it hold them

Open Document