Summary Of Carl Sanburg's Grass

Good Essays
In the poem Grass, the speaker is assumed to be the Grass, a character, or entity of sorts, brought on by the writer. Carl Sanburg uses interrogative adverbs in order to further display the Grass’s view on humanity. Additionally, Sanburg includes the use of proper and concrete nouns to emphasize the Grass’s stability and recall violent military battles. Continually, the imperative verbs shown throughout the poem give the Grass its ultimate air of superiority. In Carl Sanburg’s poem Grass, he skillfully uses interrogative adverbs, proper and concrete nouns, and imperative verbs in order to convey a sense of superiority in the Grass, a result of brute-like human behavior throughout history.
In Sanburg’s Grass, he writes two lines with interrogative adverbs, so to help express the Grass’s clear superior feeling towards humans. The part where these
…show more content…
By specifically naming historical, and bloody, battles such as Austerlitz and Waterloo—proper nouns—the Grass’s experience is immediately uncovered. The Battle of Austerlitz took place in 1805, and the Battle of Waterloo took place in 1815, and the fact that the Grass is talking of them in the sense that it has dealt with the aftermath makes it seem timeless. Generally, those who are older are supposed to be respected, which supports the Grass’s superior nature. In addition, another concrete noun used by Sanburg in this poem is “grass,” where he writes “I am the grass; I cover all” (3). This word choice not only tells who is speaking, but it also reminds one that there is something above the aforementioned bodies, something that is responsible for covering them when they are left. Ultimately, Sanburg’s use of proper and concrete nouns stresses human inferiority to the Grass, a thing that has seen, lived through, and covered up the remnants of gory
Get Access