preview

Such A Good Boy: How A Pampered Sons Greed Led To Murder: Summary

opinion Essay
2400 words
2400 words
bookmark

Such A Good Boy: How A Pampered Son's Greed Led to Murder: Summary

18 year old Darren Huenemann of Saanich, British Columbia seemed to be a model student, friend, son and grandson. His mother Sharon called him the
"perfect gentleman", as did most of the community around him. When his grandmother Doris made out her will in 1989, she made it so her daughter Sharon would receive half of her $4 million dollar estate, and Darren the other half.
At the same time Sharon updated her will to include Darren as the beneficiary of her estate. If they ever came to harm and died, he would be a very rich young man. In the fall of 1989, Darren Huenemann decided that he wanted to be that very rich young man now.
The book, Such A Good Boy: How A Pampered Son's Greed Led to Murder, written by Lisa Hobbs Birnie, starts out with a profile of the characters involved in the brutal tale. First is Doris Kryciak Leatherbarrow, born in
Calder, Saskatchewan in 1920. Doris grew up in poverty, the oldest of seven children in the farming family. Doris was a good student when she went to school, but quit at fifteen and worked at school. She married George Artemenko, a shipyard worker, and became pregnant soon after. She gave birth to Sharon Doreen in March of 1943. This daughter never knew her father; George died in a fall at work three months after the birth of his child. This left Doris alone and knowing that she needed to do something to support her child. After the war, she landed a job with the newly formed Unemployment Services in the Vancouver area, where she raised enough money to complete one of her dreams: own her own dress shop. She married again to Rene Leatherbarrow, and expanded her dress shop to a large fashion warehouse with four stores.
Next explained in the book is Sharon Doreen Leatherbarrow. She grew up under a mother that was always working, and a father that was usually away on business excursions. She learned how to manipulate her mother using guilt to receive what her young heart desired. She married three times: the second wedding yielding a son named Darren Charles, and the third wedding to Ralph
Huenemann lasted until her death. Sharon usually lived off her mother's wealth, but was later put on the payroll by Doris when Doris needed assistance in her work. ...

... middle of paper ...

...nt of their power to deliver a jurisprudent sentence, one of justice and fairness. Also a power sentence will show that the youth, knowing exactly what they were doing, are not above the law in their rights. Huenemann's money and influence also was shown to be ineffective in his attempts to become above the law. Finally, this case gives an example of the motive of greed, purely and as evil as it gets.
Conclusions

This case shows that pampering a child, showering him with wealth, and flaunting the idea that "it will all be his someday", is a formula for disaster.
The child does not have a chance to develop his own personality, therefore puts up "masks" and his real personality broods and grows to resent his elders.
The book, Such A Good Boy: How A Pampered Son's Greed Led To Murder, written by Lisa Hobbs Birnie, is a well written case review, with very little bias or contrary opinion. It strictly relates the facts in almost every aspect.
This would be a good book for a senior law class to read and relate their ideas on the evidence, the judgment, and the inside of the criminal mind of Darren
Huenemann.

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that doris made out her will in 1989, so her daughter sharon could inherit it.
  • Explains that doris was a good student when she went to school.
  • Narrates how this daughter never knew her father, george, who died in a fall in 1943.
  • Narrates how she knew she needed to do something to support her child after the war.
  • Narrates how she raised enough money to complete one of her dreams: own her own dress.
  • Narrates how they lived under a mother that was always working, and father, who was usually away on vacation.
  • Narrates how doris put her on the payroll when she needed assistance in her job.
  • Narrates how by the time he was in the third grade, they had learned the rules.
  • Analyzes how the drafting of doris and sharon's wills was a turning point.
  • Narrates how david muir and derik lord, both 16-year-olds, were friends.
  • Narrates how david bought a cabin in the woods, new car, and 100,000 dollars.
  • Opines that the easiest way to kill the pair would be when sharon visited doris.
  • Narrates how darren attempted to make it look like a botched break and enter.
  • Explains that he had the motive of greed and so they asked around in his circle of friends.
  • Narrates how they planned the whole thing and went to amanda, who also gave her account.
  • Explains that the other two boys were only 16, which meant a hearing to see if they should be.
  • Concludes that both the brutal slayings should be tried in an adult.
  • Opines that derik was home for the evening on october 5, 1990. the crown drew upon this.
  • Explains that jury did not know of the confession, since it was unadmissible by law.
  • Describes her life, and a rock and a hard place. before living in canada, she worked as a journalist.
  • Describes the main players' profiles, the outline of the plan, and the case.
  • Opines that she does not reference the trial at all or any other books with a quote.
  • Analyzes the facts, but makes a few points of interest.
  • Opines that birnie feels that the act is too lenient.
  • Explains that lawyers and experts live in only black and white, which can cause great rifts.
  • Narrates how the youth was 12 when he committed the crime.
  • Opines that leyton's motive to kill was not the same.
  • Explains the young offenders act and the fact that lord and muir were raised to an adult court.
  • Analyzes how the case shows the motive of greed, purely and as evil as it gets.
  • Opines that flaunting the idea that 'quot;it will all be his someday', is a formula for disaster.
  • Recommends this book for a senior law class to read and relate their ideas.
  • Explains that sharon updated her will to include darren as the beneficiary of her estate. if they ever came to harm and died, he would be a very rich young man.
  • Analyzes birnie's comment about the end of the brutal tale by the appeal court of british columbia.
  • Explains that the accused was older, all of 34 years. the motive, and the delusions, are the same.
  • Explains that no parole until 10 years were done, was a harsh punishment for the 16-year-olds, but it showed that the court was not going to be lenient for just an heinous crime.
Get Access