Subculture Theory And The Deviant Behavior

1483 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The subculture of violence theory

Deviant Behavior is optional not to conform norms and does not come together with an outlook of prosperity groups of the society as a whole. However, the subculture violence theory is described to have people in these situations which are separated as they begin to believe the acts and values that are ordinary, or better-quality to all other views. A number of things are associated with deviant behavior and the subculture violence theory. Some examples include, no subculture can be completely different or absolutely in conflict with the society, the counter-norm is nonviolence, recognized and unrecognized collective reins that attempt to avoid or diminish deviance, and crime, the infringement of properly enacted the law, is official deviance while having an unofficial social violation.
According to the article, Subculture Theory: A Historical and Contemporary Assessment of the Concept for Understanding Deviance. It discusses how subculture violence and deviant behavior attracts interest in culture and the society because it have been theorized, which is not simply separated from, but also in disagreement to, the prevailing culture. In addition, this article states that the whole country of the United States deals with perception of the subculture violence theory that has been a main descriptive implement for sociology and criminology to understand deviant behavior (Blackman, 2014).
On the other hand, the subculture violence theory, can be compared and contrast with the strain theory because both theories pertain to deviant behavior. However, the subcultural violence theory is based on characteristic norms and morals that are shared by a group of citizens within the society and how they lead to deviant behavior. As f...

... middle of paper ...

... I found to explain the boost of poverty and homicide rates in the community as of today, are Merton’s strain theory and Shaw and McKay’s social disorganization theory. Merton’s strain theory distinguish that social structures have limited contact with the goal of achievement through lawful means. Shaw and McKay’s social disorganization theory discuss that a diluted family and the public bound citizens together, which affects the social control of the society.
In conclusion, the reason for me choosing the topic deviant behavior and the subculture violence theory because I wanted to explain and figure out why there is so much crime and violence taken place in the society. After reviewing and looking over many different empirical articles, I discover that there are a lot of them that discusses deviant behavior and the subculture violence theory. Deviant behavior is

Show More
Related

  • The Effect of Gangs in There Are No Children Here

    952 Words  | 2 Pages

    Kennedy, Leslie and Stephen Baron, Routine Activities And A Subculture Of Violence: A Study Of Violence On The Street, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 30 No. 1, Febuary 1993, pp. 88-112 (Journal)

    Read More

  • External Restraint Theory

    1449 Words  | 3 Pages

    The subculture of violence theory revolves around individuals using violent acts in need of survival. In this theory, people kill because one was living their lifestyle through violent acts as normal behavior. According to Thio, Taylor, and Schwartz they mention, “violent behavior is more effective than nonpoor families’ (Thio et al, 2013, p. 79). Most poor neighborhoods have higher chances of committing crimes, especially, knowing that the behavior of the actions is reflected towards survival. These behaviors can be reflected on the family, peers, and community aspects. Living in poor neighborhoods, can be scary when not knowing what type of violent act or individuals that live around one. For example; some individuals might be influenced with gangs or fall into the wrong crowd. Individuals, who choose violence, are influenced by the experience from these gang groups, peers, parents, or normal neighborhood behaviors. These individuals live through the violence acts to kill because this is the type of lifestyle they are living in. I believe that people are violent because they believe killing is an escape to get away from issues and own problems. Also, people might turn to killing because it’s the main solution for survival. For example; if one is being harassed, one might feel that violence could to a key factor to protect themselves in this type of

    Read More

  • The Boondock Saints’ Positive Deviance

    1358 Words  | 3 Pages

    The movie The Boondock Saints provides an excellent example of positive deviance through innovation. The Social theory of deviance can easily explain the brothers’ actions. The movie can be used to study deviance as the brothers kill people who are mafia members, breaking the norms of society. Even though the acts they are committing are clearly illegal and deviant, the people of South Boston do not react in a negative way. Since the Social theory is very broad, it will be easier to look at the brother’s acts under three sub theories: Labeling, Conflict and Strain theories.

    Read More

  • What Is The Mystification Of Social Deviance?

    1132 Words  | 3 Pages

    Before the 1950’s theorists focused on what the difference was between deviants and criminals from “normal” citizens. In the 1950’s researchers were more involved exploring meaning and reasons behind deviant acts. This led to the most dominant question in the field of deviance, “what is the structural and culture factors that lead to deviant behavior?” This question is important when studying deviance because there is no clear answer, everyone sees deviance in different ways, and how deviance is created. Short and Meier states that in the 1960’s there was another shift in focus on the subject of deviance. The focus was what causes deviance, the study of reactions to deviance, and the study of rule breaking and rule making. In the 1960’s society was starting to speak out on what they believed should be a rule and what should not; this movement create chaos in the streets. However, it gave us a glimpse into what makes people become deviant, in the case it was the Vietnam War and the government. Short and Meier also write about the three levels that might help us understand were deviance comes from and how people interact to deviance. The first is the micro level, which emphasizes individual characteristics by biological, psychological, and social sciences. The second level is macrosociological that explains culture and

    Read More

  • Gang Case Study

    1010 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to Becker, the labelling theory of deviance looks at what happens to individuals after they are labelled as deviant (Skatvedt & Schou, 2008) The symbolic interactionist approach focuses on the role of social labels and sanctions that pressure individual gang members to continue engaging in deviant acts (Skatvedt & Schou, 2008).The labelling theory suggests that when an individual is labeled as deviant they are more likely to be rejected by families, friends, and societies which ultimately leads to further deviant acts (Becker, 1973). The deviant identity is thus complete when the individual gang member integrates himself into the gang subculture (Becker, 1973). Two high school gangs, the Roughnecks and the Saints, were constantly involved in deviant acts such as drinking, petty theft etc.,; however, high school teachers labelled the Saints as those headed for success and the Roughnecks as those headed for trouble (Chambliss, 1973) After high school, almost all of the Saints went to college and became doctors, lawyers, etc. while only two Roughnecks went to college and others were involved in killings and dropped out of school and so forth (Chambliss, 1973) This case study demonstrates that labels are powerful; they can trigger a greater involvement in deviant acts through social

    Read More

  • Social Deviance And The Strain Theory

    697 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sociologists understand the concept deviance in a variety of ways. It is the result of unsuccessful socialization, the solutions is usually intended to change the mind of the individual, and that order need to remain maintained. Norms determine whether something is deviant or normal. So deviance depends on the social status and power on the person, the social context in which the behavior occurs, and the historical place it takes place in. Deviance is all about violating the day to day norms and is usually considered to be wrong bad, or immoral. It is a process because it just doesn’t happen one day it’s usually happens overtime. For example, its two type of deviants the primary deviance and the secondary deviance. Primary deviance would be

    Read More

  • Criminological Theory Essay

    1300 Words  | 3 Pages

    Shaw and McKay (1942) specified residential mobility as a second aspect of social disorganization that influences crime rates. In the words of Kasarda and Janowitz (1974) communities operate "as a complex system of friendship and kinship networks and formal and informal associational ties rooted in family life and ongoing socialization processes.” Population turnover, or the constant influx of new residents into an area reduces opportunities to create long lasting relationships between neighborhood residents (Bursik, 1999). Fewer ongoing relationships cause social ties and social capital to be weak thus contributing to the inability to recognize common values and organize collective efforts against unwanted behaviors. Empirical tests of social disorganization find the residential mobility component also to be mixed as associated with violence rates (Hawkins, et al., 2000; Haynie & South,

    Read More

  • General Strain Theory Essay

    869 Words  | 2 Pages

    The second is related to status and respect. This type of status can change even between subcultures and may result in crime in order to achieve this s...

    Read More

  • Deviant Behavior: Deviance: Positive, And Consequences

    1499 Words  | 3 Pages

    Deviant behavior is sociologically defined as, when someone departs from the “norms”. Most of the time when someone says deviance they think against the law or acting out in a negative behavior. To sociologists it can be both positive and negative. While most crimes are deviant, they are not always. Norms can be classified into two categories, mores and folkways. Mores are informal rules that are not written; when mores are broken, they can have serious punishments and sanctions. Folkways are informal rules that are just expected to be followed, but have no real repercussions.

    Read More

  • The Sociology of Deviance Disputing it is Dead

    1614 Words  | 4 Pages

    Goode, E 2006, 'IS THE DEVIANCE CONCEPT STILL RELEVANT TO SOCIOLOGY?', Sociological Spectrum, 26, 6, pp. 547-558, SocINDEX with Full Text, EBSCOhost, viewed 3 June 2014.

    Read More

  • Robert Agnew's General Strain Theory

    986 Words  | 2 Pages

    General Strain Theory was reinvented by Robert Agnew in 1992 and contributed a new perception to the present strain theory that was popularized a couple eras ago (Agnew, 1992). Classic strain theory is connected; first with Merton’s (1938), Cohen’s (1955) and Cloward and Ohlin’s (1960). Founded on Durkheim’s theory of anomie (1893), Merton industrialized his theory of deviancy inside a societal fundamental context. Merton’s interpretation on the topic is that goal-expectation inconsistencies, composed with social stratification generates strain between underprivileged societies in turn leading them to use any means necessary, such as criminal, in order to accomplish socially defined goals (Merton, 1938). Merton specified that deviance was a creation of inconsistency amongst social goals and the genuine means to attain these goals (Smith & Bohm, 2008). Merton shaped a typology of deviance contingent on how diverse human beings adjust to ethnically persuaded strain. Conferring to Merton, crime can be elucidated by the predictable socially acknowledged goals and the conceivable genuine means of accomplishing them.

    Read More

  • Social Disorganisation Theory And Strain Theory

    1235 Words  | 3 Pages

    Therefore, the community has informal social control, or the connection between social organization and crime. Some of the helpful factors to a community can be informal surveillance, movement-governing rules, and direct intervention. They also contain unity, structure, and integration. All of these qualities are proven to improve crime rate. Socially disorganized communities lack those qualities. According to our lecture, “characteristics such as poverty, residential mobility, and racial/ethnic heterogeneity contribute to social disorganization.” A major example would be when a community has weak social ties. This can be caused from a lack of resources needed to help others, such as single-parent families or poor families. These weak social ties cause social disorganization, which then leads higher levels of crime. According to Seigel, Social disorganization theory concentrates on the circumstances in the inner city that affect crimes. These circumstances include the deterioration of the neighborhoods, the lack of social control, gangs and other groups who violate the law, and the opposing social values within these neighborhoods (Siegel,

    Read More

  • Concentric Zone Theory And Criminal Behavior

    85 Words  | 1 Pages

    3.subculture theory: some of the cultures value different cultures. the exclamation of crime posit the existence of group values that supports criminal

    Read More

  • Strain Theories of Criminal Behaviour

    2001 Words  | 5 Pages

    To gain an accurate understanding of strain theories it is best to first examine their intellectual foundations. One of the most important influences on the development of strain theories was sociologist Emile Durkheim. A structural functionalist, Durkheim argued that deviance and crime were not only normal, but also served a function in society. Durkheim believed that crime served the purpose of displaying to members of society what behaviours and actions are considered unacceptable as determined by societal co...

    Read More

  • Criminology Essay

    703 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sub-cultural theories argued that some individuals have different ways of doing things from the rest of the people in the community. They believed that these sets of people commits crime because they follow their own gang group ways and that the crimes which these people commit is not due to that they do not socialise within the society, but they hang out with the wrong people who were criminals and they end up committing crime with them. These groups of people have different values and belief than most of us; also they are under a lot of strain from their gang team and the society. This pushes them to commit crime; because when they do commit crime within their gang group they earn respect.

    Read More

More about Subculture Theory And The Deviant Behavior

Open Document