Student-Teacher Relationships in Teacher Program Education s

643 Words2 Pages

The learning contained in this example may result unsubstantial for many readers but, in essence, it illustrates a genuine piece of knowledge that is often displayed in schools and has been long time neglected in Teacher Education Programs.

Making the student to use the dictionary may be not among any canonical response to the problem (not knowing the concept of condensation). It may be thought that it should have been better to tell the Student Teacher to prepare more consciously the key concepts of the lesson next time. We agree. But we also believe that any form of knowledge should be considered valid as far as it is useful when dealing with practical situations. For us we have in this example, in the very end, an expert teacher’s rule of thumb to solve the problem quickly the next time the Student Teacher might face a similar situation. If the mentor teacher, as expert, recommend using that rule is because it serves for a purpose, although it might be a temporarily one, a necessary footstep that leads to more sophisticated –and probably more canonical- strategies.

Therefore, the sum of pedagogical principles such as the one described above constitutes part of the practical knowledge repertoire that expert teachers use in their daily teaching, a crucial aspect that not only outlines particular teaching patterns but also determines professional roles and identities.

The important issue therefore is finding ways to make this valuable knowledge explicit and communicable to others, especially the ones that are learning the profession. But, apart from that it is also important to articulate them into theories of -and for- practice that may be utilized by other professionals (both in service and pre service). Practical knowledge...

... middle of paper ...

...own: Georgetown University Press.
Verloop, N., van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 441–461.
Wang, J. (2002). Learning to teach with mentors in contrived contexts of curriculum and teaching organization: experiences of two Chinese novice teachers and their mentors. Journal of In-Service Education, 28(2), 339-374.
Wells, G. (2001) The case for dialogic inquiry. In G. Wells (Ed.) Action, talk, and text: Learning and teaching through inquiry. New York. Teachers College Press (pp. 171-194).
Weinberg, F., & Lankau, M. (2011). Formal mentoring programs: A mentor-centric and longitudinal analysis. Journal of Management, 37, 1527–1557.
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13, 339-351.

Open Document