The average student debt in Canada is approximately $26,000. Would you be able to afford that amount of debt as a young individual if you do not come from a rich family? In Canada, approximately 40% of students do not pursue post-secondary education due to financial barriers. Therefore, post-secondary education should be free because more educated people will lead to a better society, it currently leaves many people in debt, and would lead to an equal opportunity for all.
Everybody wants to be educated for free after high school and many countries offer it, so why not Canada? If the government takes the advantage to invest in its people, the crime rates would lower significantly. At an average of 1.56% of a homicide rate, 1.94% of attempted murders, 62.85% of sexual assault, and 1190.12% of violent criminal code violations; all reported by Statistics Canada data. These are crime rates (per 100,000 residents) that occur all around Canadian provinces and territories. People will have the opportunity to climb out of their social strata and the society itself will become bigger and better. Only 60% of Canadians attend college/university, and
…show more content…
The majority of students in Canada leave university/college with an average of $30,000 - $150,000 worth of debt. Imagine a child with great academic potential but handicapped by his/her family's poor financial state. How will he/she have the ability to afford the tuition required by the universities when he/she barely has enough to eat? If we implement free post-secondary education then students from all financial backgrounds will be treated equally. Free post-secondary education would provide students with more choices for a future career. Well educated students have more advantages to increase their skills and abilities to use new technology and come up with more creative ideas in the real world;
Canadian students will maybe have to look at options to go to school abroad or somewhere else" (occording to CBC News, 2014). Government wants to accept more international student due to high amount of fees that international students pay: "International students, meanwhile, can pay three times that amount — or an average of $19,500 every year" (CBC News). Furthermore, government is also giving out perminet residency to internationals students who finishes unverscity " In addition to recruiting more, the government wants to prevent "brain drain" by making it easier for international students to obtain
Opponents of free post secondary education tend to believe that the establishment of free post secondary education will never happen because it will be too expensive for the federal and state governments to maintain in long-term. As a result, free post secondary education can lead to a great impact on Canadian economy, students’ success in life and environmental issues.
Next year, Chile will do the same. Finland, Norway, Sweden and many other countries around the world also offer free college to all of their citizens..” Also, other countries have higher test scores than the United States of America. So shouldn’t we be following these other countries education system? The youth is going to be our future, so we want our future to be heading in the right direction. Even though people might say, public colleges and universities might become less worried about wasteful spending since they won't have to compete with other schools on cost. That could strain public budgets even further. Here is the weakness, Is a College Education Worth It? “People would have more freedom to contribute their talents, try new ideas, and pursue the lives they want if they didn't have to start off in debt or stay stuck in a low-wage job. This could lead to happier people and happier people could lead to a happier, more prosperous nation as a whole.” People would have more freedom to try new things and not have to worry about any funds. I am not disagreeing with the fact that every person wouldn’t take that their college opportunities serious, but there are students that are not in college today waiting for an opportunity for something as breathtaking
First, free college can encourage students to go to college to get a degree which leads to a high paying career. It can fulfill those students that are having a hard time financially, and fewer students will be in debt. Second, with free college, colleges will be more likely to help students that need the guidance to stay on track and get a diploma. Clayton and Bailey mention, "If we want to significantly improve educational outcomes, we need to make college more affordable so more students can enroll, and make the reforms needed to en-sure community college students can succeed in their courses, complete their program, and grad-uate within reasonable amount of time" (Clayton and Bailey). Finally, free college can help the U.S. catch up to the rest of the countries with higher education. For example, it can help the United States surpass Russia, where more than half of adults have a diploma. Frohlich explains, “More Than 53% of Russian adults between the ages of 25 and 64 had some form of higher edu-cation in 2012, more than in any other country reviewed by OECD” (Frohlich). Although free college is an attractive idea, it will leave the United States in a bigger debt which will be hard to recover from and more students will be unmotivated to
There is no doubt that college is expensive, price tags for some universities go over a quarter of a million for just a bachelors degree! (That’s if you graduate in four too). The extravagant price for college is no doubt crazy. Trying to better yourself and your future shouldn’t cost $250,000 plus. If public universities were to be free a plethora of problems could be solved instantly. According to Forbes the National student loan debt has surpassed 1.2 trillion dollars (Denhart )! This number is growing exponentially as more students enroll in to college. Why question then whether college should be free? Well, this number is the total amount of student loan debt from all students that have exited college. Some of these students are freshly graduated while some are aged with the wisdom trying to pay their loans back. If public universities were to be free and funded by our federal government, our government would pay this amount within ten years. Relatively a short amount of time considering that the student loan debt is an accumulation debt from students that have graduated more than ten year ago, also this also greatly increase with the following years as well.
When coming to college your whole money situation changes, suddenly you're bombarded with housing costs and student loans that you have to pay back or you will spiral into debt. Your whole life changes you don't have your parents paying for your voluptuous wants and needs, you’re on your own. The move from high school understudy to college undergrad is a standout amongst the most upsetting and essential times in an adolescent's life. Not only is your day to day life going to change but your spending habits have to change. The school years are a period where a high school student leaves their support team behind,
When it comes to achieving success in the working industry and accomplishing a successful career an education is important. Getting a degree is essential to be successful. The issue is the higher the education the person wants the higher the cost is. Nowadays, not everyone can afford paying out of pocket for an education, which mean that students are forced to take out large amount of student loans to achieve that degree. Student debt is an ongoing problem, students are gaining oversized debts that most of the time if not ALL are defaulting and jeopardizing future credits. How much debt it too much debt? Everyone should have the liberty to
No students should be in debt for their education. If students can’t go to school for free, they should make it affordable. Without financial aid families would not be able to pay for the students’ tuition. The country should make it easier for those who have kids that are juggling work and school. Having an education gives everyone a better opportunity for their future.
The debt will only continue to grow with neglect, so the most effective action to take would be to eliminate the cost altogether. The argument for free higher education is not only an economic issue, but a moral one as well. Currently, social mobility in the United States is at or close to its lowest point in modern history (Eskow).... ... middle of paper ...
Free higher education will help education live up to the reputation of leveling the playing field and providing opportunity to move up in society. It is something that will reward hard working kids with no debt and set them up for the future. It will allow students to focus on their school work and will eliminate the need to have to work to pay for school. This will help their success rate and help people graduate on schedule. Free education will also stop the student loan crisis that has now surpassed credit card debt. Free education is something that is very important for our people individually and as a whole. Our country will end up as a smarter, more powerful society. It is up to us as a country to take responsibility and look out for our country. We need to keep up with the country’s that are passing us in education and build a brighter
Throughout adolescence, there is a constant reminder of how important a college education is if one wants to be successful in life. Unfortunately, after generations of working hard and developing massive amounts of student debt, people begin to question the quality of a degree. The significance of college degrees gets muddled underneath the amount of stress student debt puts on people while they are pursuing individual dreams. In some cases, because of the amount of debt that has accumulated, people are never able to improve their lives after working hard through school. In this study, the effects of rising tuition are looked at through the perspectives of five individuals. There are many different types of people that are affected by the
A college education is necessary today in society. Students can focus on their academics and try to get a high score. The cost of education for each student has become more difficult to afford. Thus, many students and teachers wonder if free college tuition must be granted. Free education must be responsible and funded by the U.S. government because it will help students focus on their studies, and encourage them to work harder in school. Even thought many people think that education must be free, it is very important for many reasons such as the economy, quality of education, and value of a college degree.
The college education should be free for a citizen. The average cost for college per year is $8,893 in the United States which middle class cannot afford (‘Essay about University Education Should Be Free”). Most of the students stressed their fees and cannot concentrate on studies. Having free education in college students will concentrate more on studies then worrying about the fees.
Clearly, the merits of having free higher education outweigh the drawbacks in immeasurable ways, benefiting the individual learners, states, and the nation at large. Having education in higher education free to all would ensure that every citizen get an equal opportunity in life regardless of their social status, it would allow people to concentrate on nation-building rather than loan payment after school, it would make the nation skill-sufficient and all citizens be more productive. Most importantly, education is a basic right that everyone deserves and money should not be a hindrance, thus, education should be free for all.
Free higher education has been seen successfully in places such as Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Norway and Germany to name a few. Most see this as a positive example to show if they can do it, than why can’t we. Germany is seemingly proof that free higher education can be accomplished easily by means of protest and by participation in politics (Wiener). This is definitely not the case here in America. The reason why that education system would work is because these countries are all vastly different from the U.S. According to the article “Free College in Europe isn’t Really Free,” the U.S. has an enrollment rate of 94% while Germany and other European countries are at about 62% enrollment (Jackson). With a much smaller country than us, they also have a significantly smaller amount of people attending college. Our country is simply much too large and populated to be able to achieve that. These countries also pay much more in taxes than we do. Therefore, free higher education is an unrealistic expectation for such a vast country as