Stephen King Analysis

860 Words2 Pages

In his book On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft, Stephen King says, “It is possible to overuse the well-turned fragment […], but frags can also work beautifully to streamline narration, create clear images, and create tension as well as to vary the prose-line.” (133) Though he doesn’t blatantly state it, King describes the use of constructive solecism. Constructive solecism can be defined as the use of a grammatical mistake in speech or writing in order to convey a message that wouldn’t get across if it had been written in the confines of proper grammar. Cage the Elephant, E.E. Cummings, and Daniel Keyes utilize the use of constructive solecism in their respective works, and by doing so they redefine the idea of having to have one’s work fit into the grammatical norm. The song “Ain’t No Rest for the Wicked” by Cage the Elephant has an obvious use of solecism in the title, and its usage also continues through the song’s …show more content…

Charlie Gordon, who is a mentally disabled adult subjected to a surgery that increases his mental capacity, writes the novel in journal format. Throughout the first few chapters of the book, Charlie’s writing is comparable to that of a child first learning how to write: he uses run-on sentences and has trouble with subject-verb agreement. In order for the book to have been written with proper grammar, the narrator of the book would have had to been someone other than Charlie, which defeats the key purpose of the book, which is to understand how the surgery affects Charlie’s life. Keyes’ use of solecism juxtaposes Charlie before the surgery, post-surgery, and the deterioration of the beneficial effects of the surgery towards and during end of the novel. Without the use of solecism, the readers would not be able to fully understand how the surgery affected Charlie not only intellectually, but also socially and

Open Document