Maharashtra Karnataka state border Conflict
Repercussions of state reorganisation act -1956 and later division of states on linguistic basis can be seen in the form of long pending Maharashtra – Karnataka border dispute.
Located near the borders of Maharashtra and Goa, Belgaum became a part of the Bombay Presidency after Independence. In 1948, the Belgaum municipal corporation led by Maharashtra Ekikaran Samiti demanded that the district, having a predominant Marathi-speaking population, be incorporated into the proposed Maharashtra State. However, the States Reorganisation Act of 1956, which divided states on linguistic and administrative lines, made Belgaum a part of the then Mysore State. Since then ,the issue between the two states came to the centre stage of Indian politics.
Series of Commissions on state reorganization
JVP committee
Though India got independence, indian constitution did not provide the formation of states on linguistic basis. Indian National Congress earlier passed a resolution stating the necessity of linguistic states in Ahemedabad convention in 1921. However , Congress formed the ‘JVP’ committee in 1948 , to re-think the provisions of Dhar committee formed by Indian government. This committee comprised of senior congress leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru , Vallabh bhai Patel and P.Sitaramaih.It suggested that language based formation of states should not be taken on priority basis.Central government and Nehru raised four problems regarding the states reorganisation on linguistic basis 1. Decision of state reorganiszation on linguistic basis should not be taken in hurry as it is not feasible to bring about the change in the life of people who have stayed together for many years.
2. Ever...
... middle of paper ...
... the authorities started increasing since newly formed BCC adopted a resolution demanding Belgaum's merger with Maharashtra in 1984.The BCC was ruled by Maharashtra Ekikaran Samiti (MES) .The State government immediately issued a notice to the corporation asking why the resolution should not be cancelled.
For past few years , elected representatives of Maharashtra , both in state assembly and parliament have failed to produce a united show in support of Maharashtra’s demands . On the contrary their counterparts from Karnataka have succeeded in standing by the Karnataka’s position.
After almost six decades of political churning over the border dispute, The people of Belgaum neither got justice nor peace. Utilization of their pain for electoral gains by politicians from both the states has lead to nothing but futile tension among people living on border.
As a representative of the Algo ethnic group, I want to say that our people would like the new state to introduce a parliamentary system of governence. Parliamentarism is a system of government in which the head of government is elected by and accountable to a parliament or legislature. One could rightfully ask: What is our reasoning for desiring this? We think it is justified because in presidential systems the populace at large votes for a chief executive, who is the President, in a nation-wide election. This is revenant as the Algo comprises the minority of the population of the Republic of Jarth, which consists of only 1.1 million representatives in the whole state, compared to that of 2.9 million Randies, 3.8 million Dorfas and 2.2 million Takas living in the Republic of Jarth. One can reasonably assume that the outcome will most likely be that the cumulation of the majority’s vote will hinder the representation (in numbers) of the members of the minority in office. Subsequently, the Algo will have to live under the control of a leader from another ethnic group again, which the Algo members tremble at the thought of because we are proud of their ethnicity and do not wished to be shamed for it. On the other hand, in parliamentarism, the first step is an election of members of parliament, which are the political parties. This is imperative since it will allow the Algo to be able to choose the party we really share interests with....
With every significant decision, there is always some form of conflict. Especially when it comes to perfecting a newly, formed government.
Glick, J, Schaffer, C. 1991. "The Indian Homeland." U.S. News and World Report. July 8, vol.111, n2, pg26 (6)
James, Lawrence. Raj: The Making and Unmaking of British India. New York: St. Martin's, 1998. Print.
...ernment of India Act was passed in 1935 granting self-rile in India and democratic political reforms. However, as India got closer to independence, Hindus and Muslims began to disagree on government but in 1947 independence was granted. Immediately after independence India was split into two different nations, Pakistan, which had a majority of Muslim, and East Pakistan (“The End of Imperialism & Colonialism”).
Thousands of years ago, Indian society developed into a complex system based on different classes. This system was known as the Caste System. It separated Indians into different castes based on what class were born into. As thousands of years went by, this system grew larger and became further complex (Wadley 189). This system caused frustration for the Indian citizens because they were receiving inequality. Not only did the inequality and separation of the Indian society frustrate the citizens of India, but the imperialism Britain had upon them as well. In the early 20th century, Indian nationalists wanted to take a stand against the British rule and make India independent. The British created unfair laws that created a nationalist movement
Samarasinghe, V. "‘A Theme Revisited’? the Impact of the Ethnic Conflict on Women and Politics." JOURNAL OF WOMEN POLITICS & POLICY 33.4 (2012): 345-64. Web. 12 Feb. 2014.
their colony in Goa by the first decade of the 16th Century but their territorial and commercial hold in India
During the Cold War, many regional conflicts occurred and were noted as the significant battles which later led to decolonization. One of the regional conflicts were India and Pakistan fighting for their independence. In 1947, India was released under Great Britain’s control and gained its independence. However, the country was divided between Muslims and Hindus, which share different religions. Muslims wanted church and state to become unified while Hindus wanted a separation of these two establishments. Since these two ethnic groups disagreed, it was difficult to create a new government. Therefore, India was divided into two nations: India for the Hindus and Pakistan for the Muslims. Hindus and Muslims were racing to the border in order to get to their nation state which led to killing 500,000 people due to rioting. Although, Mohandas Gandhi, an Indian National Congressman, wanted to obtain peace between these two religions. Pakistan refused the H...
Whether the partition of these countries was wise and whether it was done too soon is still under debate. Even the imposition of an official boundary has not stopped conflict between them. Boundary issues, left unresolved by the British, have caused two wars and continuing strife between India and Pakistan.
The legislative powers of both India and Turkey are stronger than their executive branch, and both are unitary forms of government. India’s parliament is made up of a bi...
In late 1947, the newly created states of India and Pakistan went to war over the valley of Kashmir. A United Nations brokered ceasefire divided the state into Indian and Pakistani controlled territories, and resolved that a referendum would be held in which the people of Kashmir would be able to choose to join either country. The referendum has not been held to this day. India granted its portion of Kashmir a special status within its constitution, allowing for a great degree of self-autonomy. However, successive Kashmiri governments have been dissolved by the government of India, and elections have only been held in the presence of its armed forces. In 1965, Pakistan and India waged a second indecisive war over Kashmir. In the 1980s, resistance within Kashmir itself against the Indian government took on a violent nature, with guerilla attacks against Indian army bases. India responded with heavy army clampdowns, and since then the situation has only escalated and get worse. It is estimated that well over 34,000 people have died within the valley, and the relations between the two countries have become increasingly acrimonious. India blames Pakistan for the militant uprising, claiming Islamabad is supporting cross border terrorism. Pakistan responds that it merely provides diplomatic and moral support arguing, furthermore, that India’s history of human rights abuses in the valley is to blame. With both countries now in possession of nuclear arms; the recent war in KARGIL and the increasing number of civilian deaths, refugees, and other human rights issues within Kashmir, the conflict seems to be taking on a more serious nature. In this paper I will discuss the Kashmir conflict in some depth, examining the problem in...
India is the center of a very serious problem in the world today. It’s a very diverse place with people from many different religious backgrounds, who speak many different languages and come from many different regions. They are also separated economically. Two of the country’s religious sects, Muslims and Hindus, have been in conflict for hundreds of years. Their feelings of mistrust and hatred for each other are embedded in all those years and will not leave easily. What’s most disturbing is that there seems to be no plan for reconciliation available. There are numerous reasons for this conflict.
During partition time socio cultural milieu as well as conflict among religious groups was clearly stated. It has been seen about the guarantees brought by multiculturalism. For those of us on the edges ethnic minorities, people from regular workers foundations, gays and lesbians et cetera who had dependably felt conflicted about our essence in organizations where information has partaken in ways that reinsertion imperialism and mastery, it was exciting to believe that the vision of equity and majority rule government that was at the very heart of the social liberties development would be acknowledged in the institute. Khushwant Singh has grasped an objective approach all through the novel; we get looks of checked shock which must be the result of his own troublesome
India, before 1947, was a country divided by many regions, languages, religions and cultures. On August 14th, 1947, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan became independent. On August 15th, 1947, the jewel of the British Empire, India, was granted independence. India had been divided, primarily along a religious line, into two pieces.