Speech On Euthanasia

1653 Words4 Pages

The word euthanasia originates from Greek; eu meaning good/well and thanatosis meaning death. In other words, it means “Good Death, Gentle and Easy Death, and also known as mercy killing.” (A General History) In the old times there are different cases where euthanasia was practice towards incurable patients, mentally and physically ill persons, children and adults with disabilities, and many more, this practice was regarded as a way to protect the society from unnecessary burden, or as a way to 'save ' the person from the burden of existence. Today, many diseases have no cure, they cause suffering for the individual and suffering for the family. People should have the right to die if they are suffering from incurable diseases, therefore, euthanasia …show more content…

Many Christians who believe in euthanasia justifies it by reasoning that the God whom they worship is loving and tolerant, and would not wish to see them in agony. They do not see their God as being so vengeful as refusing them the Kingdom of Heaven if they accelerated the end of their life to avoid prolonged, unbearable suffering. Another consideration must be that, by checking out before the Grim Reaper calls, is one is depriving oneself of a valuable period of good life? Is that last period of love and companionship with family and friends worth hanging on for? The argument that this is so is heavily used by our critics. Euthanasia supporters enjoy life and love living, and their respect for the sanctity of life is as strong as anybody 's. Yet they are willing, if their dying is distressing to them, to forgo a few weeks or a few days at the very end and leave under their own control. …show more content…

Whether one is wrong or right and evil or good, depends on the situation of the patient. The moral difference between killing and letting die, many people think that it is acceptable to withhold treatment and allow a patient to die, but that it is never acceptable to kill a patient by a deliberate act. Some believe active euthanasia is morally better because it can be quicker and cleaner, and it may be less painful for the patient. Though many think one is better than the other some believe none are good, however would their opinion change if they were to feel what these patients feel? That is an important aspect to understand, how the moral ethics build upon this situation. A situation where a person is dying of incurable cancer, will die in about 7 days, is in great pain despite high doses of painkilling drugs, so he asks his doctor to end it all. Let 's suppose that the reason this person wants to die is because he wants to stop suffering pain, and that that 's the reason the doctor is willing to allow euthanasia in each case. Active euthanasia reduces the total amount of pain a person suffers. Causing their death swiftly is a lesser evil than allowing them to live in pain, therefore is active euthanasia is a lesser evil than passive euthanasia? The debate continues, but depending on the circumstances, people change their views, supporting one over the

Open Document