Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
essay on characterisation of sherlock holmes
characterestics of sherlock holmes
characterestics of sherlock holmes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: essay on characterisation of sherlock holmes
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is an author who is deeply interested in the mysteries of Sherlock Holmes. He wrote this novella called “The Adventure of the Speckled Band.” Sherlock Holmes is an observant detective and Dr. Watson is a compassionate medical doctor. As soon as they are informed of this murder case, they report straight to Stoke Moran, where Helen Stoner awaits their arrival. Helen Stoner is an anxious woman who is petrified that she will not survive as her sister Julia dies on the eve of her wedding. Dr. Roylott is an abusive and violent man. Nobody in the story is comforted with his presence. The story takes place in April, 1883 in Stoke Moran. Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson proceed to solving the mystery. They are determined to solve this mystery, and they refuse to leave without the mystery solved. Immediately after Sherlock and Watson begin their investigation, Dr. Roylott commands they quit investigating and return to where they came from. Dr. Roylott refuses to unravel what he is hiding. One day, Dr. Roylott transports himself out of town and Sherlock and Watson attempt to search for clues throughout the bedroom. Sherlock and Watson examine a plethora of clues. They still do not have enough information and clues to …show more content…
This story was a foul play mystery. It was a foul play mystery because there were many false clues in the story that may have led readers to thinking different outcomes then the real one. Due to the events that occurred in this story, Helen Stoner will get married and live a happy life without having to deal with Dr. Roylott. From the moment that the mystery was solved, the tone shifted from challenging to uplifting and the mood shifted from petrified to happy. Sherlock Holmes was truly a catastrophic hero in this story, he made an impact on everyone and he certainly was not leaving Helen with the mystery
Sherlock Holmes was not accountable for the demise or killing of Dr. Grimsby Roylott. The story “The Adventure of the Speckled Band” was written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Dr. Roylott had intimidated Sherlock Holmes after his daughter, Helen Stoner, had gone to Holmes about a whistle she heard. Helen Stoner appointed Holmes and Watson to assist her from mysterious happenings. Sherlock Holmes could not have anticipated that Dr. Roylott was sitting in a chair in which the ventilator was right on top of the chair. Even though Dr. Roylott used to be a generous, polite man, he was now an ignoble and arrogant man.
...he met the detective, fell victim to Moriarty’s games. “Moriarty is playing with your mind too. Can’t you see what’s going on!” (Sherlock). During Holmes’ last days before his faked suicide, he pleads with John to see reason through Jim’s manipulations, as does Desdemona with Othello’s accusations. Even Sherlock’s oldest friend Detective Inspector Greg Lestrade was doubting Holmes’ credibility.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is best known for his Sherlock Holmes stories. Although he did many more, these proved to be the most popular to this very day. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was born in Edinburgh in 1859 and lived until 1930. The time in which Sir Conan Doyle lived, had a great influence on his work. Doyle served in the South African Wars as a doctor. This influenced him because when he returned to England he wrote "The Boer War," and "The War in South Africa: Its Causes and Conduct" which justified England's participation. For these works he was knighted in 1902. During World War I he wrote the "History of British Campaign in France," and "Flanders" as a tribute to British bravery. One of Doyle's famous Sherlock Holmes story is "The Speckled Band." This is the murder Mystery I am using to compare to Roald Dahl's "Lamb to the Slaughter"
The film adaptations of literary works can sometimes be a nightmare. However, they can also turn out better than the original work in some rare instances. In the case of The Speckled Band by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the movie was a better format for telling the murder mystery because of the movie’s ability to show rather than tell the audience what is happening, the clearer explanation of the plot, and the more in-depth development of the characters.
The way Holmes began most investigations was by finding an alternative and providing against it. This step is comparable to the popular saying, "don't put all your eggs in one basket." Holmes never once only had one thought of what happened. What made Sherlock great was that all the possibilities were relevant to him. Nothing could ever slip by him. If something out of the ordinary did happen it was not a surprise to him.
Sherlock Holmes construed to Dr. Watson how he was able to come to this unimaginable caudate. He was able to find vital clues from what seemed to be preposterous details. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle brilliantly used red herrings to create a completely unpredictable foul play novella by which only the scintillating and inventive Sherlock Holmes could solve the mystery. This is an example of a foul play as the author provides several red herrings or false clues to mislead readers. Examples of the red herrings Sir Arthur Conan Doyle included are; the window that is in Julia’s room, the use of the term “speckled band”, and Julia’s coroner’s report that claimed that the cause of death was of natural causes. Hence the death of the antagonist, Dr. Roylott, the mood of the story became happy. Similarly, the tone of the story transitions to an uplifting tone. The death of Dr. Roylott will ultimately permit Helen Stoner to become a respectable member of society. Additionally, she will be able to successfully become married. With the knowledge of the true cause of her sister’s death, hopefully she will be able to properly mourn her sister. Sherlock Holmes used his indisputable brilliance to solve the case of the speckled band, ultimately, saving Helen Stoner from an atrocious
Throughout the story the mood changes from initially being anxious, when Helen arrives, to being petrified which occurs when Helen’s concerns are indeed verified, to finally happy when the main conflict is resolved through the death of Dr. Roylott. When Helen Stoner arrives in April, 1883, she informs Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson of her fear that she would meet an ending similar to that of her sister. Through the explanation of the suspicious events of Julia’s, Helen Stoner’s sister, death, Sherlock was able to concur that this was indeed a serious matter. Holmes grew suspicious of Dr. Roylott based upon the description provided by Helen. Dr. Roylott’s aggressive nature and past were exceptionally suspicious. Additionally, the bruises upon Helen’s wrist was one example of the abusive relationship that Dr.Roylott and Helen had. This is an example of a character versus character conflict that is both internal and external. The man versus man conflict between Dr.Roylott and Sherlock Holmes made Dr.Roylott an even greater suspect. Dr. Watson, an intelligent doctor, and Sherlock Holmes agreed that they should begin their investigation that
Sherlock Holmes sudden reaction surprised Dr.Watson. Dr. Watson saw Sherlock Holmes hitting the open vent in the ceiling. Next, they both heard a piercing scream; which had both stunned. Both went to investigate Dr.Roylott’s room. Once they entered, they saw Dr. Roylott sitting on a chair with a snake wrapped around him. This situation concluded that Dr.Roylott was responsible for the death of Julia Stoner. Dr.Roylott used a snake-a specked band- to try to kill Helen Stoner as well. The resolution of the story was that, inadvertently, Dr. Roylott died from the speckled band biting him. The solution to the problem with Helen and Dr. Roylott was solved since she could now marry her fiancé without having her step-father intrude. The answer to the problematic situation with Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Roylott was that since he was now gone, they would not have any struggles with each other. The solution to the conflict with Dr. Roylott and society was that since now he was deceased, the society would benefit. The society would not be affected with the belligerent behavior of Dr. Roylott. The final reaction of Helen Stoner was content since she would not be abused in any way by Dr. Roylott. The finishing response of Dr. Roylott was that he was dead; therefore he did not have a reaction. Dr. Roylott died with being despised by many. The concluding response from Dr. Watson was that he was slightly surprised by what had occurred. Sherlock Holmes ultimate view was that he knew about the snake already; therefore was not surprised about the outcome. The death of Dr. Roylott did not have much of an effect on the characters in any depressing
Mysteries have always held great fascination for the human mind, not least because of the aura that surrounds them and the realm of the Unknown into which they delve. Coupled with the human propensity of being particularly curious about aspects which elude the average mind, the layer of intrigue that glosses over such puzzles makes for a heady combination of the literary and the popular. In the canon of detective fiction worldwide, no detective has tickled the curious reader’s imagination and held it in thrall as much as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes. The 221-B, Baker Street, London ‘amateur’ detective combines a rare blend of intellectual prowess and sharp wit to crack a series of baffling riddles.
For Sherlock Holmes, his partner in crime is Dr. John H. Watson. Not only is he a trusted friend, but also he is Holmes’ associate and the first person narrator of the Sherlock tales. The stories of Sherlock Holmes are a collection of short stories and fictional novels created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. These stories are based on a famous and most notorious detective all throughout London, Sherlock Holmes. Along his side, Dr. Watson narrates his and Holmes’ detective cases and reveals Sherlock’s abilities and knowledge of solving cases and fighting deadly crimes. For the duration of the stories, Watson and Holmes share a particular relationship where Holmes verbally dominates Watson, “You see, but you do not observe. The distinction is very clear” (Doyle 241). When he isn’t insulting Dr. Watson he talks about how much he relies on his partner, “I am lost without my Boswell” (Doyle 243).
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was a British physician and writer, mostly well known for his stories “Sherlock Holmes”, which are generally in the field of crime fiction. He was a prolific writer whose other works include science fiction stories, historical novels, plays and romances, poetry, and non-fiction.
The suspense is created by the different characters and many mysterious setting. In this story suspense is presented in a way to keep the reader engaged in the story. The main suspense begins with Helen Stoner telling her story to Sherlock Holmes. Helen told Holmes about the mysterious and strange events that occurred. The events such as, whistling in the middle of the night, as well as her sister’s mysterious death. Doyle describing the dark bedroom that Watson spend the night in, made the reader feel the suspense as if they were in the same room. He uses descriptions such as “...This is very interesting. You can see now that it is fastened to a hook just above where the little opening for the ventilator is” as well as “Holmes as we sat together in the gathering darkness” (Conan Doyle) made the reader more engaged into the story. Foreshadowing is also created in the story to give clues that suggest events that will occur later in the story. Foreshadowing is seemed to be seen when the pole rope was connected to a ventilator and the ventilator went to the next room. The poisonous snake was the weapon used to kill the daughter, by traveling through the
Sherlock Holmes, one of the most famous fictional characters in literary history is a detective capable of solving the most complex mysteries. The author behind the character, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is a very successful British writer. The majority of his literary success is due to his crime-fiction tales such as the Sherlock Holmes series. However, Mr. Doyle and Mr. Holmes himself must not take all the credit because there is another character that plays a major role in the stories success. He goes by the name of Dr. Watson, Holmes’ sidekick. The importance of Dr. Watson is evident in many of Doyle’s stories such as A Scandal in Bohemia and A Study in Scarlett.
Mr. Holder went to Mr. Holmes in a hysterical manner. He was calmed down and started to tell him his mystery. Then Holmes asked him whether any one visits them, no one replied Holder except for Arthur’s friend George Burnwell. He added that Mary does not go out of the house, which seemed strange for a young lady but her uncle thought of her as a pleasant and quite girl, and thought of his son of being guilty.
James Kissane and John M. Kissane, “Sherlock Holmes and the Ritual of Reason”, in Nineteenth-Century Fiction, Vol.17, NO.4, March 1963, pp.353-62.