Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
media's influence on criminal justice system
media's influence on criminal justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: media's influence on criminal justice system
Ever picked up a newspaper and read about a celebrity drive while being drunk, then they get pulled over are accused of being offensive to the arresting officer and other people. then several weeks later you hear about this same person being only charged with a minor offense when you remember it was a DUI (driving under the influence). Why does the law help these celebrities.
Being a celebrity exposes them to the public, and many celebrities take advantage of this in many ways. from endorsing sportswear to sunglasses, sometimes you even see them supporting politicians. Regardless of their interest this is important because they are trusted by their fans and are believed to be a person with morals and integrity. Sometimes you can turn on a television and see them hosting an event raising money for various causes, from helping hospitals that take care of kids that have cancer to earthquake victims or gathering food for the homeless. and we all can see this and it feels good that somebody is making at least an effort to help.
It is common knowledge that the law is almost always imperceptible to famous persons that commit a crime, most are light in nature, leaving the attending officer an easy choice to give him or her a just a warning and send them on their way, but what happens when the offense is more severe, dangerous enough to endanger himself and those around him. Do they do it because they know they can get away with it, or they do it because they are human like you or me and make mistakes like everyone else. Do they deserve a change to explain themselves, or should they be treated like any average person in this country.
When someone is driving under the influence and a police officer stops you, the officer start a se...
... middle of paper ...
...ng would change at all if we do not denounce the injustice and unfairness to the law agencies, we can make all take a part in this and put an end to the so-called celebrity favors.
Meanwhile I will be keeping an eye on the newspapers and check a website now and then about how our stars are behaving. Hopefully there will not be a necessity to make petitions for these problems to be addressed. But I feel confident that America will come forward and will address the issue with vigor and fortitude.
Works Cited
Fleeman, Mike. "Khloe Kardashian Enters – and Leaves – Jail". People. 3/15.2010 .
Haggin, Daniel J. Advanced Dui Investigation: A Training And Reference Manual . Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 2005.
"Tager Law Firm". Tager Law Firm. 3/15/2010 .
Martha Stewart did not get stigmatized for her crime. Usually high profile people who commit a
Justin Bieber was recently arrested for drag racing while under the influence of drugs and alcohol in Miami. Not only was he under the influence, he was also driving without a valid license. To top it off, he resisted arrest (Navarrette)! If that's not criminal grounds, I don't know what is.
Once an individual makes the decision to get behind the wheel after consuming alcohol they are not only putting themselves at risk but the lives of other people on the road. After reviewing the Annual Report of the California DUI Management I was astonished to find that in 2008 there were a total of 214,811 DUI arrests (Annual Report). Of those 214,811 arrests I was sickened to find that 38,266 of the drivers were a second-offender (Annual Report). This means that these individuals have had one DUI arrest within the previous ten years. It is disheartening for me to discover that 26.4% of the reported 214,811 arrests are due to individuals who were second to fourth-offenders.
Rich and powerful people have gotten away with numerous crimes and scandals throughout American history, solely because of the number that’s in their bank account. For example, Orenthal James Simpson, or more commonly known as OJ Simpson,was found not guilty of the crime of murder in the court of California, county of Los Angeles, just because he had the money to buy the cream of the crop when it comes to lawyers. He had a full deck of judicial powerhouses that included Johnnie Cochran, Robert Shapiro, and Robert Kardashian. Simpson was allowed to keep generating sports memorabilia during his trial, which allowed him to afford his "Dream Team" of lawyers — which Business Insider notes costed him an estimated $50,000 a day. So, with the help of a virtually unbeatable team of lawyers, OJ got off scot-free with the crime of murder. This goes hand in hand with Tom and Daisy and how they have the money and power to never be held responsible for any wrong doing or scandals that they’re involved
Nigel Covington, editor of The National Report gives a brief summary at the end of his article stating that James Holmes, who murdered twelve people in a movie theater, will only be charged with illegally parking his car in a handicapped parking spot when he murdered the victims. After already dropping the charges because Holmes is white, it turns out he is not above the law and will have to pay an eighty dollar fine for parking in handicap parking (Covington). Covington makes a mockery about the fact that the only punishment a man who killed twelve people will get a measly fine for parking in the wrong
Perhaps this, then, is the real issue. Clearly, from the standpoint of the advocacy organizations themselves, celebrities are beneficial as activists in today’s culture. They are the perfect spokespeople to maneuver through such an entertainment-driven society and political arena. They raise money and awareness that many aid organizations would not otherwise receive. This research has shown that celebrities have an effect on voter turnout, and also on the way citizens vote. The problem is no longer determining whether celebrities are effective activists. Research now must be done to determine the repercussions of such a celebrity-driven culture on politics, humanitarian aid, and the world.
North Carolina DUI & DWI Laws & Enforcement at DMV (2014). The dmv made simple
“Every year, in the United States about 600,000 and ten percent-of all motor vehicle crashes recorded by police department are all due to consumption of alcohol.” In 2003; 42,643 fatalities were caused by vehicle crashes. Of those, 17,013 (40 percent) were alcohol related. The majority people with DUI’s are not alcoholics. “Beer drinking causes about 80 percent of alcohol-related fatalities.” A crash is alcohol related if any driver, pedestrian or passenger involved has any trace of alcohol or there is suspicion of alcohol usage. As the cases of drunk driving quickly increase over a period of time as one of the fast developing public problem, more definite and stricter regulations should be emphasized on books and in the academic world to control such recurring drunk driving offenses.
Today most young people think that if a person is rich and famous, they can get away with anything. They see rappers get charged with felonies and then they see that the charges get dropped. They’ve heard of celebrities running over children while drunk and get away with it without doing any time. However, not all rappers have run-ins with the law, but the ones that do are very well known. Tupac Shakur (RIP), for example, had many run-ins with the law. He was arrested for aggravated assault, and charged with shooting two off duty police officers in Atlanta in 1993, but the charges were later dropped (bomp). He was also accused of beating a limousine driver in Los Angeles and found guilty of threatening a fellow rapper with a baseball bat in Michigan (bomp).
We are part of a generation that is obsessed with celebrity culture. Celebrities are distinctive. Media and consumers alike invented them to be a different race of super beings: flawless, divine and above all the real moral world. In a 1995 New York Times article “In contrast, 9 out of 10 of those polled could think of something
In previous years, the issue with the paparazzi and media has grown. With the advances in technology, it makes taking and posting photos of celebrities or public figures much easier. The public appears greedy and feels privy to their private lives. Celebrities, or any public figure, have very limited privacy due to the paparazzi and media. The paparazzi and media are also affecting celebrities’ children. Currently, laws are being put in effect to stop this.
After observing and researching all the sources portraying celebrities I have came into a conclusion that todays society it seems like all we want is to be accepted and we tend to look at other people and judge. Its not right, we all are different and thats what makes the world go round. It would be a pretty boring world if we were all the same. Celebrities deal with this everyday, I think the paparazzi know more about some celebrities lives than they actually do. They judge them for who they are and what they do, it is not right nor fair.
With celebrities all over the media, it is expected that some are idolized by their fans, especially the youths. There nothing wrong with people making celebrities their role models. Celebrity role models can be a positive influence by changing people’s lives and way of thinking for the better. On the other hand, when impressionable kids and teens see their celebrity role models do something that is not morally sound, they will come to think that it is acceptable making it more likely for them to do it. This raises the question: should celebrities be role models? For the most part no. Role models are people that are admired by others for their accomplishments and not their status; however, many celebrities
According to Steven Knowlton, author of Moral Reasoning for Journalists, "Celebrities of all sorts-musicians, athletes, entertainers, and others-make their living from the public and the public therefore in a sense employs them, just as it employs governors and presidents..."(54). Most journalists figure that celebrities voluntarily surrender their pr...
...l” relationship with their fans. Celebrities who are involved in an election use their loyal fans to propel them into victory by staying in character throughout the campaign. Many times voters are voting for a movie character in the case of a celebrity running for office rather than the actual person. The fans have gotten to know the character and this is who they adore. Not only do many celebrities want to be politicians but many politicians want to be celebrities. While in office, many politicians work hard to gain a fan base that many celebrities bring with them into office.