Special Field Order 15 Essay

1195 Words3 Pages

Skylar Windholz Professor Mills US History Since 1876-History 1632 10 December 2017 General William Sherman Special Order 15 In the primary source, it states that near the end of the Civil War in 1865, and also after the 13th amendment that abolished slavery was implemented, General William Sherman, who represented the military and government, was faced with a huge issue that needed to be solved. Since he was given ownership of “the islands from Charleston, south, the abandoned rice fields along..and the country bordering the St. Johns river, Florida,” which mostly contained newly freed slaves, Sherman had to execute a plan of where to place these individuals (Sherman). As a result, Sherman wrote and proposed, Special Field Order 15, that …show more content…

After Abraham Lincoln’s assassination, “President Andrew Johnson...ordered nearly all land in federal hands returned to its former owners” (Foner 562). The reversal resulted in confrontations by former slaves promised the land, and many insisted that land “was essential to the meaning of freedom” (Foner 562). In the end, the Freedman received and owned no land, so many had to work for their former owners again. Soon after, “sharecropping...arose as a compromise between” African Americans and whites, in which “former slaves-farmed land in exchange for farm supplies and a share of the crop” (Foner 564). However, sharecropping was still considered oppressive with its similarities to slavery. According to most scholars, the repeal of the Special Order 15 is one of the most unfair decisions in American history. It was almost saying ‘Here, we will give this land to you, but it doesn't actually belong to us, so when the Confederates come back home it is theirs again’. Although their freedom was temporary, former slaves believed they received everything but …show more content…

Especially since the South had 11 states within its territory, compared to the North containing 23 states. While the North’s “industrialists invested in the expansion of railroads and textile mills, ” the South’s economy relied heavily on cotton farming (Lecture 8/29). But when taxes on imported and exported goods began, this negatively affected the Southern economy and improved the Northern economy. In consideration of the South depending on selling cotton overseas and the North being increasingly industrialized, the South’s profits began to decrease, through the encouragement that America should trade within sections of the country. To further the economic cause of the civil war, it was apparent that “the trade balance was in favor of the North” (Fontanilla). With cotton being the backbone of the Southern economic strength, many feared that without slavery, every aspect of Southern would go down and life would turn into shambles. All of the South felt threatened by the abolition of slavery and the fading economy in their states, which added more fuel for Confederates and Unionists to go to

Open Document