In 1973, in what has become a landmark ruling for women’s rights, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a woman’s right to an abortion. Ever since, individual states have adopted, altered, and/or mutilated the edict to fit their agendas – Texas included. However, the decision made by the justices in Roe v. Wade didn’t set clear cut, inarguable demarcation lines, which has allowed the fiery debate to consume the nation. Rather than establishing a legal ruling of what life is, or is not, the Supreme Court has remained silent on the issue.
When President Johnson delivered his State of the Union Address to Congress on January 17, 1968 he spoke of the war in Vietnam with optimism. He listed the many military accomplishments to date, mentioned the word “progress” five times, discussed a “fruitful” visit with the pope, and spoke with a tone and tenor that suggested an imminent, peaceful resolution (“Johnson’s Annual Message”). Not three months later – in a similarly important speech to the American people – Johnson stoically announced that he would not be seeking reelection (“Johnson’s Address to the Nation”). What had seemed like an impending certainty dissolved into a distant dream. Public support for the war, and of Johnson, had deteriorated so swiftly in the winter of 1968 that he had no choice but to disband his efforts to seek a second term. What happened in the months between Johnson’s confident State of the Union and his more sullen speech in March of 1968 is no mystery. The Battle of Khe Sanh, combined with the more lastingly impactful Tet Offensive in late January, were devastating blows to American efforts in Vietnam. In hindsight, these events may have been militarily ineffective, yet the cultural ricochets they created throughout America can be seen as nothing short of a major victory for the North Vietnamese. These events were instrumental in turning the tides of the war.
Texas statutes created it a criminal offense to acquire or try associate abortion except once medically suggested for the aim of saving the lifetime of the mother. Appellant Jane Roe sought-after a declarative judgment that the statutes were unconstitutional on their face associated an injunction to forestall litigant city County public prosecutor from implementing the statutes. Appellant purported that she was single and pregnant, which she was unable to receive a legal abortion by a commissioned medico as a result of her life wasn't vulnerable by the continuation of her physiological condition which she was unable to afford to visit another jurisdiction to get a legal abortion. Appellant sued on behalf of herself and every one different girls equally settled, claiming that the statutes were unconstitutionally imprecise and cut her right of private privacy, protected by the primary, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth
A Texas law that made abortion a crime except when in the case of saving the mothers life was overruled by the United States Supreme Court in 1973. (Greenberg 435) In 1970, abortion was illegal for women who live in many of the states of the U.S, until a woman by the name of Norma McCorvey also known as Jane Roe, decided it was time to make a change. McCorvey was a resident of the States of Texas, and strongly believed
advance for the North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong, but also gave the United States a
The Vietnam War was a war with many unnecessary casualties and injuries. The United States entered the Vietnam War and increased the stakes. Now South Vietna...
Hanoi quickly moved into the south to appoint officials and re-organize society. Northern and southern Vietnam had been separated for thirty years. The period of 1973-1975 was “their war”, not America’s war in Vietnam. This war was fought between Vietnamese. The United States was involved monetarily, but for the most part, this war was fought between North Vietnam vs. South Vietnam. North Vietnam won and the war was over. Vietnam had finally been reunited after many bloody years of war.
“Laws against abortion have been around for approximately two hundred years though they have varied by state,” (Laws Against Abortion par. 1). In 1973, however, abortion was legalized as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court rule in Roe v. Wade. In this court case, the Supreme Court held that “the word ‘person,’ as used in the Fourteenth Amendment, does not include the unborn,” (McCuen 106). The ruling created a fundamental right for a woman to choose to have an abortion, no matter t...
There are many opinions and theories to why the Vietnam War is unsuccessful for the United States. Most of the views on success are directly attached to the perceived victories and losses of battles. The battle discussed in this paper is the Battle of Saigon. This battle is said to be one of the successful battles in Vietnam. Research on this battle comes from four online sources: Battle for Saigon, Tet Offensive (1968), Tet Offensive – Vietnam War, and Vietnam War: General William Westmoreland. There are similar facts in these sources; but, there are also subtle information additions that allow more insight into the battle as a whole. First, the battle is reviewed in its original occurrence. Then alternate outcomes are provided. The notion
the American approach in Vietnam and particularly their inability to ‘win the hearts and minds