Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Justice in sophocles
Strength and weaknesses of socrates
Strength and weaknesses of socrates
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Justice in sophocles
Athens, Greece has been one of the most influential cities for Western culture the world has ever seen. At the forefront of Athens’ resume lie three names: Sophocles, Plato, and Aristotle. Each of these three great philosophers had different ideas on life, wisdom, and the god’s role in everyday affairs, but each significantly influenced Western thought and culture. Sophocles, the first of these philosophers to have lived, was put to death by the state around 400 BC for charges brought against him of corrupting the youth and impiety. He was found guilty and sentenced to death by a group of his piers (vii). However, Sophocles did not commit the crimes the “plaintiffs” claimed he did, therefore rendering a generally just punishment unjust, causing his execution to be the real crime committed.
To examine whether Sophocles violated the laws he has been charged with violating, the charges brought against him must first be examined. The problem with examining these charges is that Sophocles’ and Meletus’ versions differ. In essence, the charges boil down to two things: corrupting the youth of Athens, and impiety. Meletus claims to know “how the young men are being corrupted, and who’s corrupting them” according to Sophocles in Euthyphro (2c, 3-4). The claim is that Sophocles is putting the future of Athens in jeopardy by indoctrinating the future leaders of the city with his “crazy ideas”. Obviously, the current leaders of the city want to stay in power and keep the city running how they like it. This leads them to try and triturate any possible rebellion or drastic change before it takes place. Logically, the place to stop this is with the leader of the group, whom they consider to be Sophocles. This charge of corrupting the youth, wh...
... middle of paper ...
...h is, technically, a fitting punishment for this crime. Drastic measures had to be taken by Athenian officials to ensure the continued success and blessing of their city, and crimes such as these could not be tolerated for fear of how the gods would react to them. The only problem with this punishment is that it was given out in error. Sophocles was not in violation of either of these crimes, and their making an example of him was lost because of the debate over his true guilt. Sophocles cared so deeply about Athens as a whole and her continued wellbeing that instead of easily escaping from jail and or his punishment, he chose to accept the consequences and respect the authority of the city officials in order to maintain the legal system’s integrity in his beloved city. This attitude is the exact opposite of the attitude he had been accused of having towards Athens.
Sophocles believed that the individual held the power and the state shouldn’t have total control over an individual. This is hardly a solution to the debate, the fact that everyone dies. Rather, it is a sign that the debate will live on for all of eternity. Beaty, Jerome., et. al.
Two ancient examples of disobedient actions come from different ages revered for standards that hold today and provide a basis for modern law; the Greek and ancient Roman empires. From the Greeks, we have come to know the story of Socrates as memorialized by Plato, and the Roman age was the time of Perpetua, an early Christian woman. The fate of those individuals is the same – a death sentence handed down by the society they lived in. Although the conclusion of their respective lives is the same, the differences that lie in the reasoning of their death run deeper, with several key factors impacting their individual destiny. As we will see, these factors affect their relationship to the states and time periods they existed.
For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen and Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society, will help to position Plato's Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.
Due to the structure of said hierarchy, the lawmakers who decide on what laws govern the land are often not the best representatives of how the common people of the given society feel. This notion applies especially in the era of Sophocles, when the lawmakers were noblemen who lived a lifestyle incomparable to that of their subjects and followers. In Sophocles’ play Antigone, Creon, the king, banned the burial of Antigone’s brother Polyneices who he believes is a traitor. Antigone finds this law unjust and proceeds to break it, finding her brother and giving him an honorable burial knowing full well the illegality of her
In the Mytilene Debate the two speakers are Creon, presenting the side in favor of killing the people, and Diodotus, on the opposing side. The two speakers present their opinions on the best way to deal with the Mytilenean people as a consequence after their revolt, as well as actions that should overall be taken in the future if history were to repeat itself. The two sides differ in that Creon wants justice for the revolt by completely terminating the Mytilenean men, whereas Diodotus considers the fact that the revolt might have been an Aact of calculated aggression@ and is willing to spare the lives of the Mytileneans. Creon accuses Athens as being weak if they forgive them, he stresses that if the Mytileans are not killed other cities will not fear the possibility of revolting against Athens: Afor it is a general rule of human nature that people despise those who treat them well and look up to those who make no concessions. Let them therefore have the punishment which their crime deserves.@ (p. 215, 38) He also argues that the same punishment should be enlisted on all the cities that betray Athens so that a consistency is apparent so that no city will think that they may escape the wrath of Athens that follows such a cr...
Ancient Athens was the site of a growing culture. Philosophy was among the many improvements and discoveries being made. With these improvements and discoveries, great thinkers were able to stretch out their knowledge to new heights. The society they lived in, both welcomed and shunned their ideals. Socrates was one of these thinkers. It was because of Socrates open-mindedness that he was sentenced to death by two charges brought against him. One, Socrates corrupted the youth and two, Socrates believed in ‘false gods’. Yet, was Socrates guilty or not?
Thebian play of Antigone has excited many debates over the years. The most prevalent being who exactly could be characterized as the tragic hero in the story. The argument that Antigone is the hero is deffinatly a strong one. There are many critics who believe that Creon, however, is the true protagonist of the play. In order to determine whether or not Creon is the tragic hero one must first examine what a tragic hero is. Aristotle states that a hero is neither purely innocent nor purely malevolent. A hero is usually born into high rank of society, and this person must possess a tragic flaw. This flaw normally stems from either poor judgment or extreme arrogance. This flaw will inevitably contribute to the character's downfall.
In 399 BC, Socrates, the great philosopher in ancient Greece, was put to death under the hands of his Athenian fellow-citizens to whom he had a strong attachment, after a final vote with over two-thirds of jurymen against him. We cannot experience the situation where Socrates gave his final argument in the court of law. From Plato’s Apology, we admire Socrates’ brilliant rhetoric and rigorous logic, while at the same time feel pity for him and indignant with those ruthless jurymen. However, the question of what exactly caused his death and why was Socrates, such a remarkable thinker sentenced to death in the very society that valued democracy the most is not easy and straightforward to answer. There are multiple elements involved that finally caused this tragedy in which “a person of high moral principle is confronted step by step with a situation from which there is no escape” (38). First of all, the moral principle and belief in divinity held by Socrates are inconsistent with those of the Athenian society, implying the very crimes charged upon Socrates were not completely groundless. Secondly, the imperfect juridical system of Athens played a role in causing this tragedy. What’s more, Socrates himself, could have offered better defense in the court, also had a hand in his own death by his stubbornness regarding to his own interpretation of wisdom and piety. His rebuttal, though brilliant and insightful, was not persuasive enough to move the fellow-citizens for his wrong approach and sophistry in his cross-examination on Meletus.
In Sophocles’ plays, humans are punished by Gods for the mistakes and unethical acts they
Woodard, Thomas. Introduction. In Sophocles: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Thomas Woodard. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1966.
In this literature review I will discuss both Socrates and Jesus Christ (Jesus). I will compare and distinguish them, by their trial, misdeeds (through the view of society), law, justice and punishment. In addition, I will write about their influence in today’s society and what impact they have made through time. Both Socrates and Jesus had many things in common yet, they we’re different. Both had different religious beliefs. While, Socrates was polytheistic, believing in several gods. Jesus, in the other hand was monotheism, believed in only one God. Both were charged, tried, and executed for their “radical” behavior with society. Overall, both men sacrificed themselves for the possible chance of change.
Socrates reaches a conclusion that defies a common-sense understanding of justice. Nothing about his death sentence “seems” just, but after further consideration, we find that his escape would be as fruitless as his death, and that in some sense, Socrates owes his obedience to whatever orders Athens gives him since he has benefited from his citizenship.
Within two classical works of philosophical literature, notions of justice are presented plainly. Plato’s The Republic and Sophocles’ Antigone both address elements of death, tyranny and immorality, morality, and societal roles. These topics are important elements when addressing justice, whether in the societal representation or personal representation.
In Greek tragedy the natural forces are destructive. These forces might be nature, gods or fate. Man is helpless in facing these powers.
When Socrates was brought to trial for the corruption of the city’s youth he knew he had done nothing wrong. He had lived his life as it should be lead, and did what he ne...