Socrates irrelgious or impious

987 Words2 Pages
Socrates ideologies and philosophical theologies transpire in the dramatizations of Plato in The Euthyphro and Defense of Socrates. In the Euthyphro a dialogue partakes between them in Athens, involving what exactly determines an action to be ‘piety’ or ‘holy’. In the Defense of Speech (Apology) Socrates philosophical ideologies and theologies are questioned. Socrates beliefs entails that was is approved by one deity (pious) can be disapproved by another (impious). Socrates views boils down to the action approved by all deities produces the action being moral or pious; he refutes Euthyphro’s knowledge. Socrates is an astute, sage, philosophical orator and teacher to his followers. Socrates criticizers and indicters accuse him of being an atheist and unorthodox for polluting the minds of the young explained by religious innovation (impiety) and looking for a natural explanation to religion (investigator). Socrates divulges that these absurd allegations are fictitious and a fable; and questions why he is showing his face in front of the Athenian court.
Socrates is approximately seventy years old during 399 BC and in the Euthyphro Socrates theologies are expressed throughout a conversation of religion and political, moral obligation between him and Euthyphro. Euthyphro asserts that the term piety is one prosecuting wrongdoers “I’m prosecuting my father as a wrongdoer…” (5e-6a), second what is dear or approved by a god is piety, third what all deities love, pious and impious are relatively equivalent. Socrates finds his response unsatisfying and ultimately calls quits “I wasn’t urging you to teach me about one or two of those many things that are holy, but rather about the form itself…” (7b-10) “but, you’re not eager to teach me… yo...

... middle of paper ...

...ed the jurors then he did not persuade them to the fullest. On the other hand, Socrates has a reputation of being ‘wise’ and a seeker for answers, they automatically have a predisposition of who he is and nothing will convince the jurors because if they do set him free then that would make them look bad. Socrates is neither ‘irreligious’ nor ‘impious’ because even though Meletus wrongly accused him of being an atheist that does not justify Socrates philosophical way of thinking. Socrates is highly astute and his foes beget fables because they believe that he is doing something bad and persuading the people of Athens to believe in other ideological beliefs. He is too astute and sage beyond their comprehension and they believe he is breaking the standard norms of Athena when he was actually improving the city/state of Athens he was a free thinker and open minded.

More about Socrates irrelgious or impious

Open Document