Socio Economic Benefits Of Aquaculture

1627 Words4 Pages

. Socio-Economic Benefits and Costs
Aquaculture operates in the public space and interacts with a wide range of other resource users and the local community. Thus varied perceptions exist of the socio-economic benefits and risks of aquaculture development. Evidence from the few available surveys of attitudes on socio-economic issues suggests that the strongest acceptance of aquaculture is generally found when local communities benefit directly from the industry (Katranidis, Nitsi and Vakrou, 2003; Whitmarsh and Palmieri, 2009; Mazur and Curtis, 2008). In developing countries, especially, small-scale aquaculture development can contribute significantly to local communities as a supplier of healthy animal protein to improve the nutrition of poor people (Irz et al., 2007; Ahmed and Lorica, 2002). In addition, aquaculture growth can increase the supply of fish in domestic markets, thus making it more affordable (Irz et al., 2007). Similarly, in Canada and Europe, consumer studies found that farmed seafood (especially salmon) is generally seen as cheaper and …show more content…

The shrimp industry, in particular, has been blamed for having a range of detrimental environmental side effects on traditional farmers and the wider society, such as salinization of soil and groundwater, pollution of waterways and destruction of mangrove habitats (Ridler and Hishamunda, 2001). In many European coastal areas, fishers claim that aquaculture is affecting them by restricting their fishing grounds and through negative environmental effects (e.g. Mente et al., 2007; Ertör and Ortega-Cerdà, 2015), giving rise to compensation demands for external costs (Liu, Olaussen and Skonhoft, 2011). In general, the tourism sector in many European countries also perceives aquaculture as a risk, owing to competition for space, navigational conflicts and the visual impact of farms (Ertör and Ortega-Cerdà,

Open Document