Social Stratification Essay

2269 Words5 Pages

Social stratification refers to a system by which society ranks people into different categories of hierarchy. When ranking they take in account someone’s status, power and wealth. Social stratification comes naturally to society. It is universal in the fact it happens in most societies but it may differ. . Social stratification can be split into four different forms – slavery, estates, caste and class. The Slavery system is an extreme form of inequality to the point where some individuals are ‘owned’ by another individual which they class as their property. The person who ‘owns’ the slave has full control over everything they do and can end up using violence against the slave. L.T Hobhouse (1929) defined a slave “as a man who through law …show more content…

Davis and Moore’s say that a functioning “society must somehow distribute its members in social positions and induce them to perform the duties of these positions” (Davies and Moore 1945 p.47) . They argue that the most difficult jobs in society are the most necessary jobs and should require the highest rewards to motivate people to fill them. Certain jobs, like mowing grass or cleaning toilets, can be performed by almost anyone, while other jobs, such as performing brain surgery, are difficult and require the most talented people to perform them. In order to get the most talented people from the less important jobs they say the society must offer the individual’s an incentive. Davis and Moore’S (1945) claim that all society can be equal but only if people are able to let anyone have any job. This will mean those who do their job poorly are rewarded the same as someone who did amazing, all done equally. But critics have evaluated and said would the incentive that everyone is rewarded equally be enough for society. Davis and Moore’s argument comes from the functionalist’s perspective where the difference in wealth, power and other rewards are justified as they motivate the more qualified people to show off their talents in the more important jobs in society. They …show more content…

The people’s skills that were most valued and needed would always be the wealthiest, the people that’s skills weren’t needed as much would always be the poorest. Weber’s view on poverty is different from other sociologists, being in poverty isn’t about not having the money but also not having the right skills, the right social equality or the right rewards for the job you do. Poverty is a big word in the meaning there are many different forms and the meaning is different too different

Open Document