Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on social stigma
Social Stigma and Subsequent Ostracism
The common perception of surrogacy as seen in India has been accurately captured by Mary Douglas when she describes it as a “cultural anomaly”. The surrogates often face ostracism because society perceives surrogacy as an unconventional method of reproduction that challenges its traditional notions of motherhood.
Surrogates from rural families lack familial support as backward families do not approve of the idea of artificial reproduction. Additionally, society equates surrogacy to having intercourse with a stranger and commodifying the child and consequently disapproves of it. Surrogates are also accused of adultery and prostitution for carrying a stranger’s child. To avoid the resultant social stigma, the surrogates must resort to self-imposed ostracism by residing at the clinic hostels for the duration of their pregnancy or pretending to have suffered a miscarriage. Surrogates in these hostels face hardships such as restrictions on meeting family members and overcrowded living spaces besides obvious constraints on their freedom. However, this is the only viable solution as they do not have the resources to find alternative housing in the face of social ostracism. This dilemma would be abrogated if the social perspective shifted from viewing surrogacy as an abnormal method of reproduction to an alternative method of achieving the traditional end of a genetically related child.
Responding to the Feminist Critique
Some feminists endorse the view that surrogacy could be a tool to de-biologize motherhood which would consequently liberate women from the role assigned to them by maternal essentialism. The followers of this school of thought oppose surrogacy as they believe that women have...
... middle of paper ...
...merican Kinship”
3. Imrana Qadeer and Mary E. John, “The Business and Ethics of Surrogacy”
4. Amrita Pande, “At Least I am Not Sleeping with Anyone”
5. Elly Teman, “My Bun, Her Oven”
6. Kalindi Vora, “Potential, Risk, and Return in Transnational Indian Gestational Surrogacy”
7. Swati Bhattacharya, “Magical Progeny, Modern Technology: A Hindu Bioethics of Assisted Reproductive Technology”
8. Anonymous, History of Surrogacy: When and Where did it all begin
9. Judith Worell and Carol D. Goodheart (eds.), Handbook of Girls’ and Women’s Psychological Health
10. Lawrence O. Gostin, Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy
11. Katherine B. Lieber, “Selling the Womb: Can the Feminist Critique of Surrogacy Be Answered?”
12. Jean M. Sera, “Surrogacy and Prostitution: A Comparative Analysis”
13. Sugato Mukherjee, Legal and Ethical Issues of Commercial Surrogacy: An Overview
“Time to Ban Surrogate Motherhood,” written by Lynda Hurst and “Surrogate Motherhood: Why it Should Be Permitted,” written by Allan C. Hutchinson, are persuasive texts where the authors’ attempts to influence the audience to agree with their side of the argument on surrogate motherhood. According to The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, surrogate motherhood is defined as, “a woman who bears a child for another person, often for pay, either through artificial insemination or by carrying until birth another woman's surgically implanted fertilized egg.” Since the persuasive works are published in different newspapers, one being The Toronto Star and the other being The Globe and Mail, the works are written for different target audiences. Comparing the articles of Lynda Hurst and Allan C. Hutchinson, numerous differences between the elements of tone and the types of structure define the target audience.
Karen (1997) proposed that contact surrogacy contracts in the social development process increasingly prominent infertility problems. The advances in biomedical technology may provide a technical solution to this problem. The impact of surrogacy on traditional family values and the impact of the law are subversive. It has changed the traditional ways of the establishment of parentage. It also raised many moral and ethical disputes that whether surrogacy should be legalized. What should the theoretical basis lie in? Legislation should be based on what mechanism to adjust the surrogate. This essay is based on the interpretation of the legality of surrogacy contracts, trying to determine the conditions of its validity and scope.
A surrogacy is the carrying of a pregnancy for intended parents. There are two kinds of surrogacy: “Gestational”, in which the egg and sperm belong to the intended parents and is carried by the surrogate, and “traditional”, where the surrogate is inseminated with the intended father’s sperm. Regardless of the method, I believe that surrogacy cannot be morally justified. Surrogacy literally means “substitute”, or “replacement”. A surrogate is a replacement for a mother for that 9-month period of pregnancy, and therefore is reducing the role of the surrogate mother to an oversimplified and dehumanizing labor. The pregnancy process for the gestational mother can be very physically and mentally demanding, and is unique because after birthing the
The advancement and continued developments of third-party assisted reproductive medical practices has allowed many prospective parents, regardless of their marital status, age, or sexual orientation, to have a new opportunity for genetically or biologically connected children. With these developments come a number of rather complex ethical issues and ongoing discussions regarding assisted reproduction within our society today. These issues include the use of reproductive drugs, gestational services such as surrogacy as well as the rights of those seeking these drugs and services and the responsibilities of the professionals who offer and practice these services.
The proposed theoretical framework that works best with drinking under the influence is the Reintegrative Shaming Theory. At the core of the Reintegrative Shaming Theory is the need to shame individuals engaged in criminal activities. However, the shaming has to function within the context of a criminal justice system. The theory premises that tolerance of crime is a pre-requisite for the worsening of illegal activities (Hay, 2001). Secondly, the theory connotes that stigmatization inherent to the shaming of crime is disrespectful because it tends to outcast individuals from the general community, which is a pre-requisite for further rebellion. Additionally, the best theory of re-integrative shaming is the “disapproval of an act within a continuum of respect for the offender, disapproval terminated by the ritual of forgiveness [leading to] crime prevention” (Dansie, 2011, pp. 71). The proposed Re-integrative Shaming Theoretical approach identifies that shaming (or social disapproval) creates emotional distress on the offender. The scope and extent of the shame are bound to vary because different people respond differently to shaming. However, standardization of the structured shaming may
The addition of a child into a family’s home is a happy occasion. Unfortunately, some families are unable to have a child due to unforeseen problems, and they must pursue other means than natural pregnancy. Some couples adopt and other couples follow a different path; they utilize in vitro fertilization or surrogate motherhood. The process is complicated, unreliable, but ultimately can give the parents the gift of a child they otherwise could not have had. At the same time, as the process becomes more and more advanced and scientists are able to predict the outcome of the technique, the choice of what child is born is placed in the hands of the parents. Instead of waiting to see if the child had the mother’s eyes, the father’s hair or Grandma’s heart problem, the parents and doctors can select the best eggs and the best sperm to create the perfect child. Many see the rise of in vitro fertilization as the second coming of the Eugenics movement of the 19th and early 20th century. A process that is able to bring joy to so many parents is also seen as deciding who is able to reproduce and what child is worthy of birthing.
Surrogacy is becoming extremely popular as a way for people to build their families and women to have a source of income. Many people have various reasons for their opposition to it whether it be by comparing it to prostitution or disagreeing with how military wives take advantage of the Tricare insurance. Lorraine Ali states in her article “The Curious Lives of Surrogates” that one of the more popular reasons to oppose surrogacy is that it contradicts, “what we’ve always thought of as an unbreakable bond between mother and child.” However, a woman’s inability to conceive her own children does not determine the absence of a mother to child bond.
Gestational surrogacy, especially when it involves commercial surrogates, challenges the status quo in the ethical theory of reproduction, because with this technology the process of producing a child can no longer remain a private matter. Now a public contract exists between two parties, the couple and the surrogate ...
Commercial surrogacy respects the feminist theory as it allows women to be heard and considers their feelings and relationships. Commercial surrogacy overcomes oppression by returning power to surrogates, defeating the patriarchal society and providing autonomy. Commercial surrogacy also tackles the issue of potentially exploiting women by protecting surrogates and, addressing the risks of surrogacy. There are many ethical issues surrounding women and the feminist theory can be a powerful tool in determining moral
Arguments against commercial surrogacy typically revolve around the idea that surrogacy is a form of child-selling. Critics believe that commercial surrogacy violates both women’s and children’s rights. In addition, by making surrogacy contracts legally enforceable, courts will follow the contract rather than choose what is best for the child. However, in her article “Surrogate Mothering: Exploring Empowerment” Laura Pudry is not convinced by these arguments.
Commercial surrogacy commodifies children because by paying the surrogate mother to give up her child, they treat the child as an object of exchange or commodity that can be bought and sold. As any business transaction, the parents give money for the exchange of an object, the child. The parents get their desired child and the mother gets the money, but what about what thee child think about this event? The parents and surrogate mother’s action were done with self-interest. It could be argued that they wanted the best for the child. However, the first priority in the intentional procreation of the child was not the welfare of the child but rather to give it up to the parents in exchange of money. Additionally, women’s labor is commodified because the surrogate mother treats her parental rights as it was a property right not as a trust. In other words, the decisions taken concerning the child are not done primarily for the benefit of the child. The act of the mother relenting her parental rights is done for a monetary price. She disposes of her parental rights, which are to be managed for the welfare of the owner, as if they were property right, which are to be handled for personal
In this essay we will critically evaluate Erving Goffman’s work on stigma and social interaction. Before we start evaluating Goffman’s theories let us first understand what both the terms actually mean.
My mother was never inclined to use therapy as an intervention and whenever it was mentioned she became very defensive. My brother followed suit by laughing it off. Many non-medical beliefs endorsed by racial/ethnic minority groups assign personal responsibility to the development of illness and may explain increased negative views held by racial/ethnic minority groups (Alvidrez, Snowden, & Kaiser 2008). The result of personal responsibility is an outside perception of weak and disabled.
Most young people envision their future in the realm of getting married and creating a family. One of the most devastating things that can happen to a young couple is to be told they cannot have children. There are several options the couple can pursue, and one of those options available is surrogacy. Society today is torn on whether or not surrogacy should be legal in today’s world. Surrogacy is very controversial for many people around the world, and opinions are strong on the subject. Surrogacy is defined as the utilization of a third party female in order for a infertile family to create a biological child for their family. Legalized surrogacy is important to many couples as an option of creating the family they have always dreamed
With every new technology that is born, there must be many questions as to whether this technology is beneficial or harmful as well as analyze who is affects. This especially holds true in dealing with the technology of artificial insemination. With the cultural mainstreaming of artificial insemination, there have been many articles written discussing the ethics of such decisions. Most of these articles are written by feminist authors with the purpose of discussing the impact of this new technology on women and how it affects their roles as mothers in society.