Social Models Of Accobility: The Social Model Of Disability

Shakespeare (2006) argues that though society does disable people, their bodies also do. He believes that you cannot just ignore the impairment and blame society for the fact that people are disabled. It has also been argued by (Bury & Gabe, 2003) that the social model oversimplifies a much larger issue. This essay has served to give a brief understanding of the theories and practices of the medical and social models of disabilities, and how they affect people with disabilities. It is an important issue to consider as there are still many things in the world the disable people and we still have steps to make society inclusive.

Moreover, social identity theory is proven to produce reliable findings which have been supported by many studies (Cuhadar and Dayton 2011) in explaining racial prejudice as an outcome of an individual identifying and favouring members of their own group and maintaining a discriminatory stance against the out-groups. Social identity theory argues that racially prejudice individuals aim to increase the distinction between their in- group and the out group (Blascovich et al 1997). It is further represented by the idea of optimal distinctiveness, which states that social identity is a result of the individual having a desire for inclusion within a group; it is the search for this optimal distinctiveness that underlies social identification within groups (Brewer 1996). Essentially, social identity theory can largely lead to an increase in aggressiveness, hostility and rejection within these groups who value themselves as higher and more important than the groups seen as a racial minority (Brown

According to Berger he explains that the social model of disability “focuses on the socially imposed barriers that construct disability as a subordinate social status and devalued life experience.” (Berger 2013, p.51). Society itself marginalizes these groups. A large object but rather a bunch of methods to the disability must not reflect the social model of disability. It also addresses the judgment that society gives disabled people. The social model came from the medical model because the social model discrimination in contradiction of disabled people and they face undesirable approaches towards them on a daily basis.

Proposed by Mike Oliver, social model of the disabled places emphasis on actual needs rather than referring impairments as personal tragedy (Best, 2005). Assumingly disability is a multi-perspective complex of social prejudice and discrimination barriers, Oliver advocated that society, as a whole should be responsible for problems the disabled face. Although it is somehow controversial, as a personal difficulty is shifted and escalated to social complication, wider scope of collective social force could be united to tackle the problem efficiently. Additionally, under the social model, an important idea pinpointed is that what the disabled group needs the most is not others’ pitying, but empathy (Best, 2005). The two actions are distinctively different: pitying involves hierarchical differences such that abled and disabled are not treated on the same ground; however, empathy engages oneself to put his foot into others’ shoe, with wholehearted compassion and understanding.

White therapists are prone to engaging in racial microaggressions and if so, the therapist-patient relationship is weakened because clients of color view their white therapists as biased, prejudiced, or unlikely to understand them as racial/cultural beings. Unintentional and unconscious acts and nature of microagressions continue to be the biggest challenge to the majority of white meant health professionals who believe they are unbiased and nonracist. Mental health professionals are in a position of power and authority over their clients and therefore any harm done against their clients is either unknown of minimized. According to this study, microagressions oppress, harm, and place clients of color in the inevitable catch-22 position. Furthermore, these microagressions are likely to go unrecognized by white mental health professional who are unintentionally and unconsciously expressing bias.

Stigmatisms and social acceptance affect the decisions of minorities more than European Americans (“Unite for Sight”). This means that the negative societal perceptions of mental health cause individuals with mental health disorders to not get treatment or therapy because they feel ashamed of their mental illness. Within health literacy, the stigmatisms and cultural issues associated with mental illness in ethnic minority communities negatively impacts people affected by mental

In addition, prejudice is also derived from pride. People think their race, culture, beliefs or values are superior to other groups. Although some people have doubts about being able to eliminate the problem, it can be solved. There are individuals who set aside the doubts and believes that prejudice can be solved. Some of the ways that people have thought of solving this problem is education, exposure to other cultures and by setting a good example.

Racism is explained as people who believe that a race is inferior to another, and therefore does not deserve fair treatment. This problem causes much discrimination towards certain groups. It also forces many minority groups to face challenges that make it difficult for them to be successful. Although various types of sociologists have different ideas about the causes of racism, they all do agree however that this is a problem that needs to be solved completely. When we look at inner-city neighborhoods, we can tell that not only are they shaped by the race and poverty that exists within them, but rather by emotions evoked by their experience with poverty and discrimination.

Though it directly uses race and discrimination in order to preference or discard a certain kind of individual, it prevails in giving opportunity to minorities to better themselves. McClain said it well by citing that even though schools or work places may be desegregated, it is not surely synonymous with equal educational opportunity (McClain 191). Due to the fact that some individuals—especially minorities and women—face social stigmatic stereotypes as well as limitations in access to life-bettering opportunities due to coming up in a

Society feels that PWDs are a threat physically. For Instance, people with psychiatric and intellectual disabilities are often seen as violent, hostile and destructive. As disabilities are categorized false stereotypes are often made because not every individual with a disability share the same experiences or characteristics so this causes negative societal responses. People with disabilities don’t often get to let the real them show because they are ... ... middle of paper ... ...d think of how this may change their life for the better. PWOD don’t focus on the self-identity of PWD rather they focus on the disability itself and that’s how PWD are defined.