Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strength of social capital
Communities and social capital essays
Social capital eassay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strength of social capital
Introduction
Social capital plays a role in community building and economic development. Through grants, the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation supports research on issues related to poverty. In 1996, the Mott Foundation awarded two grants in hopes of refining and redirecting the approach to community building. First, a grant was awarded to Robert Putnam to lead academicians, advocates, and practitioners in the exploration of ways to generate social capital and ultimately strengthen civil society. Second, another grant was awarded to the National Civic League (NCL) to teach community-based organizations how to perform their own evaluations.
This position paper examines the perspectives of academicians, advocates, grant makers, and practitioners on social capital and its role in community building found in the two essays by Wallis (1998) and Wallis, Crocker, and Schetcher (1998). While there does not seem to be much consensus of its meaning and significance, social capital has been a concept that frames policy debate and redirects practice.
Research Questions and Methodology
To answer the research question about how each of these perspectives views social capital and its role in community building, two data collection methods were used. Literature reviews were completed including position papers and annual reports. Interviews were also conducted with advocates, 28 grant makers from 16 national foundations, and practitioners from organizations that worked alongside the NCL.
Findings and Conclusion
The first perspective is academician (Wallis, Crocker, & Schechter, 1998). They have university appointments and develop and test theories through empirical studies. There is a focus in the essay on Robert Putnam’s publication titled Maki...
... middle of paper ...
...g efforts that can be regarded as mutual learning among all stakeholders in the processes. It merges these four perspectives and allows for the development of social capital. Five characteristics of empowerment evaluation include value-based, participatory, collaborative, integrative, and reflective (Wallis, 1998). In summary, the formation of social capital is a step towards civil society which is achieved when these four perspectives come together in community-building networks.
Works Cited
Moore, M. (1988). What sort of ideas become public ideas? In R. Reich (ed.), The power of public ideas. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Wallis, A., Crocker, J.P., & Schechter, B. (1998). Social capital and community building: Part one. National Civic Review, 83(3), 253-71.
Wallis, A. (1998). Social capital and community building: Part two. National Civic Review, 87(4), 317-36.
Mifflin, Houghton. (2008). “Communities: Social Studies Curriculum, California Edition.” Series: Houghton Mifflin Publishers: Liberty Edition.
Putnam, Robert D. 1993b. The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life. American Prospect 13: 35-42.
... funding and direction, including those of local government and philanthropy, are critical to tailoring programs to the specific needs of local communities, and should be leveraged through federal funding. The final ingredient is responsibility, both personal and collective. Individuals must be empowered to improve their own lives, and the community must support the effort rather than look the other way, or looking past the working poor, who can so easily blend into the background.
O’Neill, Brenda. 2007. “Human Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation: Turning Skills and Knowledge into Engagement and Action.” In Garnett Picot, Ron Saunders and Arthur Sweetman (eds). Fulfilling Potential, Creating Success: Perspectives on Human Capital Development. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
In this essay I shall make a critical comparison of different theories and approaches of community organising. By focusing on main aspects of Paulo Freire and Saul Alinsky’s models of community organising I shall discuss how applicable these models are in the UK. By drawing examples from experiences of applying Root Solution Listening Matters (RSLM) and Participatory Action Research (PAR) frameworks in my practice. I shall demonstrate relationships and differences between the two. By addressing key elements of theories of power and conflict I shall highlight the main characteristics of both and use these theories as lenses to view some problems in the communities. By comparing models of community enterprise I shall reflect on future opportunities of a budding community enterprise. Finally by outlining the methods of evaluation I shall reflect on my chosen framework for evaluation of my work.
To fully understand why social, economic, and cultural capital could lead to success or failure, it is essential to know the difference between the three. Social capital is defined by the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development as “the links, shared values, and understandings in society that enable individuals and groups to trust each other and to work together” (OECD, 2015). Social capital can be multiple things including family members, colleagues, and strangers who have the
Putnam, Robert (2000) Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Social Capital, Simon and Schuster, New York.
In Unequal Childhood - Class, Race, and Family Life, Annette Lareau tributes the French social scientist Pierre Bourdieu when using his theory of the forms of capital as a fundamental argument on her study. In this theory, Bourdieu recognizes three different types of capital; social, symbolical and cultural. Bourdieu describes social capital as “the aggregate of the actual or potential resources which are linked to possession of a durable network of more or less institutionalized relationships of mutual acquaintance and recognition.” This means that social capital is based on resources built from personal relationships, club memberships and other social influence and connections. The second form of capital,
Cultural capital has great power through the control and maintenance of traditions, expected and accepted roles and behaviours, notably gender roles, important artefacts, language, institutions and services (Navarro, 2006). Of these, two essential contributors being educational facilities and religious institutions (Navarro, 2006). Finally, economic capital holds power through property and literal financial capital or monetary resources, this empowers individuals to have some degree of agency and autonomy (Navarro, 2006). This gives power to individuals to interact with higher classes, or form part of such, to purchase and interact with goods and services that are valued by the society and in turn receive respect and enhances social status (Navarro, 2006).
Within community context, there are three components; stability, social ties, and institutional capacity. Stability can be described as accounting for the transitional status of community members. Social ties relate to the connections individuals have with one another within the community. In analyzing the institutional capacity of a neighborhood, one might look at the local institutions ability to procure membership, or participation from community
Bergdall, T. (2003). Reflections on the Catalytic Role of an Outsider in Asset based Community Development (ABCD)
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974), The Spiral of Silence A Theory of Public Opinion. Journal of Communication, 24: 43–51.
Commitment to community is a requirement for contemporary Americans and vital to its survival. “Love thy neighbor as thyself” is the unselfish act of sharing: from a cup of sugar to a wealth of information to the guardianship of all children involved and the protection of every individual in that said community. Whether that community consists of the “Classic Neighborhood, those with a common set of goals, or those who share a common identity” the thread that holds this matrix together is always woven into the shared identity as well as responsibility of all involved. (Redmond, 2010). A community cannot continue to exist through the will of withdrawn individuals who arms only embrace themselves and have no involvement whatsoever with neighbors one door away.
theoretical model. Routledge, 13, 537-545. Retrieved May 25, 2014, from the Academic Search Complete (Ebsco) database.
A Community can be defined as a group of people who don’t just live in the same area, but also share the same interests, experiences and often concerns about the area in which they live. Often when individuals have lived on a street or in an area for a while they become familiar with each other and the issues surrounding them. Children often attend the same schools and grow up together, again sharing similar experiences. In some instances adults may work together, and quite commonly all community members will share the same doctors, dentists, hospitals, health visitors and other public services and facilities.