Pros And Cons Of Abolitionist And Anti Slavery

1012 Words3 Pages

“ The existence of slavery in the United states presented the greatest possible contradiction to the American heritage of liberty and equal right ” In 1830s slavery was so connected with the government and the community that they forgot about liberty. Not everybody agreed with slavery and how it treated African American people ,they had abolitionist and anti slavery activist . Both Abolitionist and Anti slavery activist determined to end slavery. The delegations of powers disagreed with what the abolitionist and antislavery activist had to say. Both Sides had a legal approach towards slavery , the federal government of the state is trying make both sides happy and equal. Those opposed to slavery argued that “ The fifth amendment’s due process The indeed started to return all the runaway slaves back to the south. The united states kept trying to defend the rights of slaves owner throughout other countries but the federal government was all for slavery so they bumped heads. Therefore the abolitionists began a petition asking for the congress to end slavery in columbia which the national government controlled. As the petition got to the congress the southerners became infuriated and decided to go out and kill those abolinistor who was promoting to end slavery.Abolitionist and the anti slavery advocates stated that “ the federal fugitive slave act was unconstitutional “ because it does not give specifically give congress permission to return all the runaway slaves and “ the act’s provisions deprived accused runaways of various right specified in the bill of rights” . In Prigg v. Pennsylvania , the supreme court over ruled the act and its guaranteed the slave owner and catcher the rights to hold all slaves without going to court for seizing them.The state 's law is considering that as kidnapping and requires proof. Now in the south slave owner would not have to prove

More about Pros And Cons Of Abolitionist And Anti Slavery

Open Document