Situational Leadership Theory

791 Words2 Pages

Leadership and management are terms that are frequently used conversely within the workplace, creating confusion. In the context of management leadership is a well-researched topic, but is still not fully comprehended. Irrespective of this most authors concur on the fundamental principle; leadership involves direction. Clawson (2011) discusses leadership being a quality whereby an individual deals with vitality, firstly inside themselves and after in people around them. Similarly, according to Northouse (2013) leadership is about an individual influencing a group to achieve a common goal. This reiterates the importance the new manager can demonstrate strong leadership skills to influence and empower the staff to move the site forwards. Kotter …show more content…

The reason for this is because it will help to gain trust within the staff, which will in turn develop a willingness to communicate. Once the staff is willing to communicate some order and structure should be brought to the facility to help it move forward. Hersey and Blanchard’s (1969) situational leadership theory proposes that no particular leadership style can be deemed as the best. Therefore, the appointed manager needs to adjust to the circumstances and the group they are leading while aiming to achieve the general goals of our company. A political theorist, Burns, proposed two different approaches to leadership; transactional and transformational. Bass and Avolio (1998) used Burn’s politically orientated leadership theories and developed a model with three leadership styles: transactional, transformational and laissez-faire. With the understanding of this model the new manger would need to adopt the transformational leadership style over transactional, as the Leeds branch needs new direction and does not have clearly defined rules and goals in its current

Open Document