In the stories Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, and A Midsummer Night’s Dream by William Shakespeare, there are characters that have similarities, and also share some differences. In the book Frankenstein, the character I chose is the monster, and the character I chose from the book A Midsummer Night’s Dream is Oberon. I chose these individuals because they are both out for revenge, they both are cruel, but they also differ. Their differences are that Oberon has a wife, but the monster does not. The monster was created by Victor Frankenstein, but Oberon was born. Firstly, I chose to compare and contrast Oberon and the monster because they are both out for revenge. Revenge plays a crucial role in the story Frankenstein because all of the murders in the book are caused by the monster seeking revenge on Victor Frankenstein. He is seeking revenge because he claims that he is hideous, …show more content…
Frankenstein kills many people on his hunt for Victor Frankenstein. He does so because they are scared of him, and in one case, they chase him out of the village with pitchforks and torches. Anger began to boil inside of the monster. He lashed out on many people he came in contact with. The monster was also responsible for the murder of William, although the murderer was thought to be Justine Morwitz. Oberon, king of the fairies, is cruel because he very resentful to his wife Titania. He is appointed cruel because he calls upon the mischievous fairy Robin to gather up the love-potion flowers in order to make the “love juice”. He causes mayhem within the story because of the accidental placement of the love juice on the eyelids of the lovers. This accident was caused because Oberon told him to look for those dressed like an Athenian. Puck came across Demetrius and Helena in the forest asleep. “They are dressed much like Athenians” he said. He placed the love juice on their eyelids. From this point on, the story is one big
Mary Shelley’s gothic novel Frankenstein is a novel narrated by Robert Walton about Victor Frankenstein and the Monster that he creates. Frankenstein grew up surrounding himself with what he loved most, science. He attended Ingolstadt University where he studied chemistry and natural philosophy, but being involved in academics was not enough for him. Frankenstein wanted to discover things, but did not think about the potential outcomes that could come with this decision. Frankenstein was astonished by the human frame and all living creatures, so he built the Monster out of various human and animal parts (Shelley, 52). At the time Frankenstein thought this creation was a great discovery, but as time went on the Monster turned out to be terrifying to anyone he came in contact with. So, taking his anger out on Frankenstein, the Monster causes chaos in a lot of people’s lives and the continuing battle goes on between the Monster and Frankenstein. Throughout this novel, it is hard to perceive who is pursuing whom as well as who ends up worse off until the book comes to a close.
Knowledge can be the key to success and can lead people to happier life. However, there are some instances that you can not gain any more knowledge because of how it would change your whole life. The drive of wanting more and more knowledge is best portrayed through two well -known books. In Mary Shelley’s, Frankenstein, and in Daniel Keyes, Flowers for Algernon, both the creature and Charlie are ostracized by society because they are different from everyone else but this distinction gave way for distinct fallouts because of their quest for knowledge beyond their reach to achieve happiness.
Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, a very gory story, can also be seen a romantic piece within having characteristics, such as celebration of the individual, importance of imagination, strong emotions, and an awe of nature. Within the piece there is many references to how one comments on the accomplishments and achievements of another or themselves, also known as the celebration of an individual. An example of how Frankenstein uses the celebrations of individual is when Frankenstein, himself, talks about his achievements of how fast his experiments turned out. He talks about his success, by staying, “ As I applied so closely, it may be easily conceived that my progress was rapid ” (chapter four). By saying, “applied” it shows that he is saying
In her novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley and the film Edward Scissorhands by Tim Burton their creations have a desire to be loved. Which leads them on a journey of acceptance for themselves and others. Everyone has felt the need to find why they are here on earth; we all search for answers we are no different from them.
The theatrical search of drama and freewill According to Webster’s Dictionary Freewill is: “the power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one's own discretion.” In the theatrical conventions of Drama and freewill that each character portrays within one’s own choice of state. In Oedipus the King and A Midsummer Night’s Dream, the choice of freewill is a dramatic chase to discover one’s own fate. In each play, free will is shaped by some supernatural entity to allow for the dramatic resolution, weather it be by parents, Gods, or fairies.
Gender inequality will always affect the way women are portrayed in society, the weaker, unnecessary, and other sex. It is not just a subject of the past, but still holds a name in society, however in the olden eras the way women were treated and are looked at, in a much more harsh condition. In Shakespeare’s Othello and Shelley’s Frankenstein women’s roles in the books are solely based on the way they are treated in their time period. The way women are portrayed in these books, demonstrate that they can never be in the same standing as men, considered the second option, and therefore will never have the same respect as men. In both Othello and Frankenstein women are treated as property, used to better men’s social standards, and lack a voice,
Throughout this school year our Honors English class has been spending time reading and analyzing multiple classic books, all of which I find intriguing. This includes "A Midsummer Night's Dream", "The Odyssey", "Candide", and my personal favorite, "Things Fall Apart." This book emphasizes cultural ideas of both the Europeans and the native Africans as they face conflict. The characters in "TFA" demonstrate two different ways to react to conflict. Out of the many books we've read throughout this year, "TFA" was easily the best.
The monster in Frankenstein is lonely throughout the story looking for meaning, much like Grendel from Beowulf. These two monster type characters are both outcasts in their stories that have less than pleasing appearances. The monster from Frankenstein is abandoned by his master, while Grendel is exiled from the townspeople. Grendel kills because he sees other’s happy while he cannot be, which is similar to the monster killing because Frankenstein created him into a world that did not want him. These characters only wish is to be normal and have meaning, although this isn’t an easy task for these monsters.
At first glance, the monster in Frankenstein is a symbol of evil, whose only desire is to ruin lives. He has been called "A creature that wreaks havoc by destroying innocent lives often without remorse. He can be viewed as the antagonist, the element Victor must overcome to restore balance and tranquility to the world." But after the novel is looked at on different levels, one becomes aware that the creature wasn't responsible for his actions, and was just a victim of circumstance. The real villain of Frankenstein isn't the creature, but rather his creator, Victor.
The main plotline of Frankenstein involves the lives of two major characters, Victor Frankenstein and the Monster. Their relationship is a tumultuous one, mainly due to the fact that Frankenstein created the Monster out of a wish to be some sort of god and be able to play with the balance of life and death. Afterwards, he comes to deeply regret his action and abandons the Monster by throwing him out into the world without any education or guidance. Because of this, throughout the book, the Monster harbors resentment towards Frankenstein and dedicates his life to make Frankenstein’s a living hell. Out of the many horrible things that the Monster did to achieve this goal, the main evil action I will be focusing on is the murder of William, Frankenstein’s younger brother and the framing of his nanny for the murder.
Both Frankenstein and the monster suffer greatly through the novel, Frankenstein experiment, that had gone totally wrong. The monster is not mean, in the way that he tried to fit in, into society, but was shunned and never accepted by anyone. The monster lived alone, isolated for everyone and everything, meanwhile Frankenstein suffer as well. He loss everyone around him, in a blink of an eye, in the hands of the monster, regretment as he is the creator of the thing that destroyed his life. Although many blame everything on the monster, in the way he badly behaved, he is not at total fault for his action.As in the way that when the monster commits his crime with passion; he doesn't think apon his actions, but only lives in the moment and his action are his mostly rage.
In life most people have a rivalry with another person whether that just be a friendly competition or something of the opposite sort. Have you anyone in mind that could fit that descriptor? I bet you do. In A Midsummer Night’s Dream, the two rivals named Lysander and Demetrius fight over nearly everything that comes between the two’s interests. They may be rivals but there’s not only differences, but similarities as well. In the beginning of the play one of the first things we notice about the two are made clear to us through the quote, “Stand forth, Demetrius.--My noble lord, This man hath my consent to marry her.--Stand forth, Lysander.--Any my gracious duke, This man hath bewitched the bosom of my child.”(I,i,P.2).
The Loss of Magic Throughout A Midsummer Night’s Dream by William Shakespeare, there are multiple analyses that one can follow in order to reach a conclusion about the overall meaning of the play. These conclusions are reached through analyzing the play’s setting, characterization, and tone. However, when one watches the production A Midsummer Night’s Dream directed by Michael Hoffman, a completely different approach is taken on these aspects, leading to a vastly different analysis of the work. Though there are many similarities between the original written play A Midsummer Night’s Dream by William Shakespeare and the on-screen production of the aforementioned play which was directed by Michael Hoffman, there are differences in setting and
Victor Frankenstein created the monster that led to his utter distortion as Roderick entombed his living sister giving her her need for revenge he know of this as he himself said ”I shall perish, I must perish in this deplorable folly. Thus, thus, and not otherwise, shall I be lost. I dread the events of the future, not in themselves, but in their results. […] I have, indeed, no abhorrence of danger, except in its absolute effect--in terror. In this unnerved—in this pitiable condition--I feel that the period will sooner or later arrive when I must abandon life and reason together, in some struggle with the grim phantasm, FEAR.” (Edgar Allan Poe, The Fall Of the House of Usher Paragraph 11). Yet in his own madness he feared neither of death nor pain he was only afraid of fear, knowing it would be the death of him. As it was, once she had found her revenge she seems to die with her brother as his heart stops in terror. Madeline it seemed was a physical aspiration of Roderick’s fears. As both their fates are tied to one another with Roderick’s actions. This is seen on either side of the connection between Frankenstein and his monster. Frankenstein created the monster and abandons him, the monster with the influence of mankind’s cruelty chooses to seek revenge, Frankenstein then hunts the monster down to seek revenge upon the monster’s actions. The relationship between Frankenstein and
In a vast majority of William Shakespeare 's plays love in its multiple forms is a prominent theme but it is romantic love that takes the main role in both A Midsummer Nights Dream and Othello. However in both these mentioned plays, romantic love is portrayed in very different ways, which shouldn 't seem too odd given that the two play are at different end of the spectrum, one being a comedy and the other being a tragedy. Yes, of course, some of the love stories in these plays have their similarities but the end results are so drastically different that it is hard to even imagine that these love stories are ultimately the same. Despite some stints of manipulation from outside sources the love displayed in A Midsummer Nights Dream, for the most