Analysis Of Sigmund Freud's Civilization And Its Discontents

965 Words2 Pages

In Sigmund Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents, Freud juggles between the civilized and savage human lives in order to show his assessment on civilization, the source of discontent. Civilization is a paradox. According to Freud, civilization, although its purpose would seem to assist the advancement of human misery and suffering, is actually somewhat the cause for that suffering. This explains human’s subliminal hostility toward civilization. His assessment on civilization has relation to his theory of instincts and the individual psyche because that is where the civilization emerges from. As Freud states on page 73, "If civilization imposes such great sacrifices not only on man's sexuality but on his aggressivity, we can understand better why it is hard for him to be happy in that civilization. In fact, primitive man was better off in knowing no restrictions of instinct." Freud argues that civilization is basically harmful
He had mainly focused on love/sexual drives (Eros), but he now accepts the existence of the "aggressive instinct," which is related to Thanatos, the god of death. Freud had earlier denied those who considered the existence of an aggressive instinct and resisted the acceptance of this belief. He eventually comes to accept this hypothesis. Freud’s understanding of civilization is a result of the struggle between affection and aggression, two of the fundamental instincts. Civilization is a conflicted matter. It is the product of opposing drives and impulses.
Freud thinks the purpose of civilization is to provide protection from nature for humans. It adjusts and regulates the mutual relations among human beings. It sets humans up for interactions with others. But aside from that, civilization also promotes things that seems useless, such as things like beauty, order, and art are useless. So you can say that civilization also produces luxuries and supposedly enhances this so called "quality of

Open Document