Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative essay about migration
Argumentative essay about migration
An argumentative essay about migration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argumentative essay about migration
1. Introduction There are different kinds of rights, which humans from all over the world are able to exercise, e.g. freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom of association. All of mentioned are supposed to be exercised in order to maintain the socio-economic development of any country. One of the most important rights is the right of people to migrate (move from their neighbourhood or country). There are a lot of debates held on the issue whether it would be appropriate to open borders and give people the right for freedom of movement not only within their country of origin, but also across international borders. Quite sufficient number of theories and studies exist, which are discussing the pros and cons of accepting the freedom of movement the basic moral right of an individual. There are multiple reasons for individuals to immigrate from their country of origin, such as need for escape from violence and/or opression, search for better economic situations and opportunities, intention to reunite with their families or people, who share the same religion or language etc. Others argue, that there is quite a persuasive sense to restraint free movements, such as: boundaries of accepting opportunities of the receiving countries, moral difficulties in distinguishing the importance of immigration of other people (political asylum versus an exotic cultural experience). The author will survey the main theories and studies behind freedom of movement and as well as raise the ethical issue on if migration restrictions violate basic human rights. 2. Should freedom of movement across borders be considered as human basic right One of the most significant questions for stable developed democratic countries is if they do have the ... ... middle of paper ... ... the first sight. Michael Pogge’s position brought up other very important economical and political aspects, which should definitely be taken into consideration (the number of needy people;the trends of them moving to big developed cities, which are no longer able to receive immigrants; as well as the limited resources of the receiving side). He proved, that different kinds of immigration restrictions can potentially be needed to support the wellbeing of the affluent societies. There is a lot of work left for the scientist, to make all of the approaches, discussed above, compatible. To sum everything up, one should say that there are a lot of economical, political and social factors, which are interconnected and influence emigrational policies and trends. One should see this issue of freedom of movement as complex of views and positions and research it respectively.
Article 14 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that “Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.” An unfortunate truth that remains in the 21st century is that some do not feel protected or safe in their country. In such situations, one seeks asylum in foreign nations. While some welcome asylum seekers with open arms, others are view the concept as a violation of sovereignty.
Immigrants are defined as people who permanently move to a forgiven country from their origin country. Immigrants can move for the purposes of seeking better living, better education, or in order to avoid any sort of issues in their origin country. Despite the reasoning behind the decision of the movement, an immigrant will be affected by the change of culture, way of life, social system and community. The process of the movement effects each individual differently depending on their, age, gender and their level of connection to their past culture. Having that said, the younger the age of the individual, the more venerable and easily they become to changing their way of life in order to feel a part of a community. Gender however is also related to the race of the person. To elaborate, females and black males are more open to the idea of changing any of their factors to adjust to their ‘new society’. An individual’s connection with their past culture, has a great impact on their personality and their standing and belief in their values, morals and culture. Therefore, the stronger and deeper the connection with their original culture and way of life, the more satisfied the individual becomes. Therefore, they don’t feel the urge to compete with another culture. Therefore, their current standing with their own culture has a strong impact on their future judgment on other culture. The weaker the connection the more prone they are to changing their current culture. Thus, an individual’s stability level towards their culture depends on other factors that are concerned with them. [Different age groups are faced with different situation that leads them to deal with different issues and therefore they are exposed to different kinds of expe...
Since the inception of a democratic government in the United States’ early history, many have held that a liberal democracy should be the standard to which all other governments should attempt to emulate (CNN.com, 1). As the world’s leading super power, the United States sets an exampl...
Immigration has undergone much change since the 20th century. However, a lot of the motives behind immigration and adaptation to a new culture and way of life have remained the same.
In this short essay I will address the issue of whether or not nations should restrict immigration. It is important to note that my perspective is derived from years of living in an American society. When I speak of immigrants in many cases I’ll be referring to illegal immigrants, as they are the ones to whom the restrictive laws are made in as a preventative means. Additionally, they are the ones people fear and refer to primarily when discussing immigration.
In his address to a joint session of Congress on January 8, 1918, President Woodrow Wilson declared freedom of the seas in times of peace and war. Looking back, it seems ridiculous to think that anyone could challenge the right of individuals to navigate the oceans freely. However, fast-forward to the twenty-first century and we can see an analogous debate over the issue of immigration rights, with territorial borders being the main topic of discussion. The system of immigration in the United States is complex and oftentimes restrictive, and while revisions to the system usually include increasing quotas or other solutions to let in certain groups of people who deserve special consideration (such as those whose skills are needed in a particular field), they are still very limited solutions. The obvious question that arises from letting in some people but not others is that of fairness. Is the accident of birth or luck of being in the right place at the right time enough to justify restrictive citizenship to a select few? I would argue not. I intend to argue that a commitment to human rights entails the position that borders ought to be open in order to guarantee other human rights, especially the right to migrate.
Vesnic-Alujevic, L. and Nacarino, R. C. 2012. The EU and its democratic deficit: problems and (possible) solutions. European View, 11 (1), pp. 63--70.
Every living person deserves to move freely, according to the human rights concept. When you are the citizen of a country and within its territory, the right to travel from one place to another is one of your inalienable rights. This does not mean you cannot visit another country. After fulfilling the documentation requirements at the embassy of a country, you are allowed to visit it and return back to your country. In simple terms, every living person has a right to freedom of movement.
Human rights are fundamental rights and freedoms that all people are entitled to regardless of nationality, sex, national or ethnic origin, religion, language, or other status. And these human rights is violating in some country like Central African Republic, Syria, USA, Ireland, and etcetera. One example is Syria where the people afraid live here. Therefore, article 3 of the Universal Human Rights is violated in Syria. This essay seeks to consider the human rights violations in Syria. This research will begin by evaluating the economic factors of Migration it will then proceed to investigate the social factors. In the process it will be highlighted that the impacts of migration are (im)balanced.
There have been enormous efforts to spread democracy as a political system throughout the world by the developed democratic countries and the international development organizations including the World Bank. By the late 1990s the United States alone spent over a half billion dollars to promote democratic expansion throughout the world (Diamond, 2003). These were done considering that the democratic system leads towards development. As a result in the late 20th century we saw a huge political transformation towards democracy. During the last few decades a huge number of countries adopted democracy as their political system. However, it retain a big question how far democracy is successful in bringing development of a country? At this stage, some people also criticizes the effort of democratization arguing that it is done without considering the context of a country, sometimes democracy is not ideal for all countries and it is an effort to extinct diversity of political system. In studying the literature regarding the debate, we found a paradoxical relationship between democracy and development. Some argue that democracy has failed to ensure expected outcomes in terms of development. While others confronted that democracy has a considerable impact on development. Another group of people argue that form of political system actually does not have any impact on development process. On the verge of these debates, some development institutions and academics throw light on why democracy is not working properly, and what measure should be taken to make it more successful in bringing effective development of developing countries. Consequently, this writing is an effort of revisiting the different views about impact of democra...
Migration is the geographical movement of people in order to settle in other places for longer periods of time. It has been extensively analyzed by historians and social scientists. Philosophers however have thought little and have said even less about it. The migration policies involve highly consented normative judgments in all phases; the gap is quite astonishing. The political philosophers and the political theorists rarely discuss about migration. They have never ever developed a coherent ethics of migration. The theorists have started thinking about this issue from the last thirty years and still we do not have any comprehensive and systematic treatment.
Firstly, K. Isbester mentions that democracy has a different meaning for everyone, as some can define democracy as a good aspect for development, on the contrary other believe that it is nothing more than voting after several years. Although, Latin America see democratic g...
There have been individuals and even countries that oppose the idea that human rights are for everybody. This argument shall be investigated in this essay, by: exploring definitions and history on human rights, debating on whether it is universal while providing examples and background information while supporting my hypothesis that human rights should be based on particular cultural values and finally drawing a conclusion. A general definition of human rights is that they are rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled, simply because they are human. It is the idea that ‘all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.’
A society is shaped and reshaped by the movement of people, thus, making it more diverse and complex. This exchange of people, knowledge and culture is what makes migration an important source of change: socially, demographically and economically [1]. Moreover, the movement of individuals within smaller units inside a country, i.e., internal migration assumes special importance as it is related to a process of change occurring within the social system [2]. Therefore internal migration is emphasised to be a significant indicator of the development of a nation [3].
Migration represents one of the biggest issues in today's world. It is defined as the movement of people across international boundaries, from one place to another, with the intention of settling in a new location. (Adapted from a definition of migration cited in National Geographic).