Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
restrictions do curfew keep teens out of trouble
(background) effect of curfew
restrictions do curfew keep teens out of trouble
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: restrictions do curfew keep teens out of trouble
Youth curfew laws are intended to protect teens from getting into trouble and being harmed by forcing adolescents to stay off the streets after a certain hour, but do they take away rights from teens at the same time? Youth curfew laws have been implemented across counties in the United States. One curfew law in Philadelphia (“American”) limits the times youth can be out varying by age and time from 8pm to 11pm. Mayor Nutter of Philadelphia reasons, “…which will help keep safe our citizens, especially our young people,” when speaking about the ordinance. Fines for violations of the curfew law include a $500 fine against the parent(s). Just like with all laws, people have been for and against curfew laws. These laws have been passed to control teen criminal activity, safety. Some argue that curfew laws take away rights from young people, while others say they cause issues with crime records by charging youth with breaking laws that have no criminal activities other than being out late. Others argue that curfew laws force teens to bond with their families, cause them to stay away from drugs and alcohol, reduce teen pregnancies, and over-all reduce crime rates.
When the government tells people where they can and can’t be it brings into question civilian rights, and here in the United States more particularly, constitutional rights. In instances when a youth is out of home while a curfew law is in place, (s)he can be charged with a citation, that comes with a heavy fine. The problem with curfew laws is that they do not define the circumstances that allow a youth to be out of the home, rather, they ban all activities and circumstances after the hours defined by the law. “There are countless instances in which fairness and justice dic...
... middle of paper ...
...rights from children? You decide.
In conclusion, curfew laws are attempts to force young adults to follow laws by taking away their ability to be out of the home after set hours. They are intended to keep teens from being endangered and reduce crimes. However, they take away rights from teens, create needless criminal records for crimes that are pointless, and are not effective. There is a reason these ordinances are being struck down one after the other. Should curfew laws be implemented? I don’t believe curfew laws are very productive and useful.
Works Cited
“American Civil Liberties Union.” American Civil Liberties Union. 30 Oct. 2013 .
“Study: Curfews don’t cut juvenile crime.” CNN. Cable News Network. 30 Oct. 2013 .
“Up to Date Curfew Information for the City of Philadelphia.” Up to Date Curfew Information for the City of Philadelphia. 30 Oct. 2013 .
As shown above, curfew laws can play a very critical role in a teenager’s life. It can assist with keeping the city safer, help them get enough sleep, and help them build their personal skill under a well-structured system routine. A lot of people might find curfew laws for teenagers unconstitutional and contradict the first amendment, so they decide not to abide with it. But by doing so, they are placing more a bigger experience to teenagers who are still working on developing their skills to take on new challenges. After all, Teenagers are the future of our society if we don’t teach, coach, direct, and offer guidance their future will be unstable and unproductive and that will affect the entire nation.
For starters, curfew keeps children safer than usual. When you have children just roaming the streets, something bad is bound to happen. It’s always that one experimental friend that says “hey guys, let’s go try this”. Well this one statement can lead to a heap of trouble. According to a recent study done, there has been a 97 percent drop of juvenile delinquents (Seith 1). What this means is with curfew incorporated within the community the rate of children going to juvenile centers has significantly decreased.
A good question is what's the point of fighting this, Burlington has curfew bylaws and I don't say anything about them. Well it's simple, Burlington's curfew is there in case it has to be used, like a police officer's sidearm, they don't go around shooting everyone for anything, but should the rare occurrence that they need it, it's there.
They open up the doors to a new discussion that explores the idea of not punishments for crimes they commit, but preventing them before they take place. Staying after school, involved in productive activities seems to help students stay out of trouble. Curfews are imposed in some states, preventing juveniles from being out past a certain time until a time early the next day. These curfews are said to be in place in order to prevent crimes, but there are no statistics to back this up, as there are for the crime rate dropping with kids staying after school. Regardless, these are matters of precaution taken in order to attempt to prevent crimes from happening at the times in which they’d be anticipated to. If things are in place in order to prevent juveniles from committing crimes, the crime rate will drop, and many people will be saved from entering a world unknown to the world that is prison. Stopping juveniles from committing crimes would maybe them cause adults to not commit crimes as well, since in essence, these juveniles will indeed one day be adults. By implementing laws, states and law makers understand that there will always be people that don’t follow them. By stating programs, allowing juveniles a place to reconcile with small mistakes they make, or creating a safe-place where they can seek help from
Again, every child is different, so these may vary; however, these are basic rules that could have a place in every household. A solid rule to have is a weekend curfew. This should be flexible. You should factor things like who they’re hanging out with (group size, character of the friend(s), etc.), the hangout location, and their age. 13 years old compared to 17 years old is a substantial difference. This should definitely influence curfew times for your teen. I’ve heard of some parents not having curfews in order to give their teen even more freedom. This, parents, is not a wise decision. Your teen should be aware that you have expectations for them, and, if they aren’t met, that there are consequences. It also provides structure to their lives, a crucial component for a healthy upbringing. Another fantastic yet loathed rule is the phone rule. This particular rule was implemented in my home when I was about 16 years old. My mom saw that I was dawdling and having late nights, so she set a time limit for it. I had to turn off my phone by 9:30 every night, and I absolutely hated it. I couldn’t see the benefit of it, other than my mom being able to spite me. Once my junior year of high school hit, I was swamped with activities and homework. I soon recognized the worth of having my phone off by a decent time every night, sometimes even turning it off around 9:00 PM. Now, this rule will most likely be incredibly unpopular with your family, as it was with mine. Even so, the temporary dislike is worth it in the long run. It is extremely helpful with teaching your teens time management skills while keeping them off their cellular devices for a short
Do curfews really keep teens out of trouble? Most teens do not tell their parents where
Liberty is a concept in political philosophy that means human beings are able to govern themselves and behave according to their own free will. Curfews ignore the idea of liberty and have not proven themselves as a successful tool against juvenile crime and yet are popularly utilized throughout the United States(C).” “ Curfews should be eliminated because they violate Constitutional rights, they can lead to discrimination and profiling of youth, and they take away resources, including money and time, from law enforcement. Teen Curfews are unconstitutional. We are equal and should be treated that way is that not true to teens? Teens deserve to be treated equal and same rights as adults. Adults are always telling teens to grow up and be more mature but how are teens supposed to do that when they are being treated like children with curfews. Teen curfews have an effect on youth 's ' constitutional rights and are commonly viewed as an overreaction by authorities to real or perceived increases in juvenile crime or endangerment(cpost).” “ Also, restricting minors ' freedom because of children 's particular vulnerability may be unconstitutional, because it is in the interest of cities to protect all citizens equally from crime. For a teen curfew to be justified, it must pass strict scrutiny—the ordinance must be narrowly tailored to meet a compelling interest of the government(Gammon). In numerous cities, however, teen curfews do not exempt the constitutionally protected activities of minors and instead trample on their rights. Teen curfews, therefore, do not make
There is some debate on whether curfews keep teenagers out of trouble. A curfew is defined as a law or regulation that requires a person or group of people must stay indoors for a designated time, usually through the night. Curfews usually apply to teenagers and are there to help keep them out of trouble and keep them safe. City regulations have different views on curfew times and age groups. For example, a 13 year old will need to go indoors earlier than a 17 year old. Usually a curfew is set at about 11 p.m., but can also be set for in the daytime. In consideration of having a curfew for teenagers, the crime rate has greatly decreased.
A curfew can be described as an order establishing a specific time in the evening after which certain regulations apply, especially that no civilians or other specified group of unauthorized persons may be outdoors or that places of public assembly must be closed (Dictionary.com). This definition refers to the curfews that are enacted in some states throughout the United States and some countries. A curfew can also be described as a regulation requiring a person to be home at a certain prescribed time, as imposed by a parent on a child (Dictionary.com). Local city curfew laws are enforced with the intension of reducing the juvenile crime rate. On the other hand, parents enforce curfews to keep teens safe, to protect them and to save them from getting involve in illicit things.
Strict rules create rebellious teens. Many people think that curfews are a fundamental way to keeping teens out of trouble, but this is not the case. Curfews are neither applicable, justified, nor are they a way to diminish criminal activities committed by adolescents. Curfews are ultimately useless because there are too many reasons that contradict why a curfew would work.
Curfews have been around in the United States since the late 1800s. Over time curfews have changed; the original curfews were in medieval Europe. A curfew was “the ringing of a bell indicat[ing] that fires were to be extinguished for the evening” (Fried 128). When curfews were adopted in the U.S., city officials and citizens believed that imposing a curfew helps to reduce crime rate and victimization of teens. First curfew was imposed in Omaha, Nebraska in 1880. According to the article, “Youth curfews popular with American cities but effectiveness and legality are questioned” President Harrison believed that curfews were very important in protecting children from “‘vices of the street’” (Favro). Later, curfews were adopted in many of the major U.S. cities that had populat...
Students need to be supervised after a specific time of night. This isn’t because they will do something disruptive, but they might run into trouble and not know how to react. Stated in an article by Ebscohost, “Hundreds of U.S. cities have laws of curfew that apply to kids 17 and younger, and with that crimes and deaths have went down significantly over the last couple of years”. This valid fact supports the opposition that curfew is over all a good idea for students and parents. If more cities could recognize this now the world can be a safer place. In another example while being in darkness you are more vulnerable to get hurt. You cannot see as easily as you would if you were in light thus making it easier to hurt you. While being inside in a well-lit room or sleeping, you are guaranteed to be much more safer than being outside. Students shouldn’t even be out that late; there is no need to be. All stores are closed, no one is outside, and you are just waiting for trouble to strike.
How can a curfew keep my young teenager from doing illegal activities? Having a curfew provides teens with a limited amount of time to commit any criminal offenses.
According to McClain, Kansas City police and officials implemented a curfew for minors. This curfew restricts teenagers the rights that they’re are able to take part in. The curfew refuses teens the right to dine, watch movies, talk with friend, or walk around the plaza after 9 p.m. The curfew was implemented due to a shooting that occurred involving a number of teenagers. This article informs the reader that not only are teens having the freedoms that other people are able to enjoy taken away, but they are also being discriminated against because of their age. These restrictions are not only discriminative, but they’re unconstitutional. The 14th amendment to the constitution has a clause, called the Equal Protection Clause. The Equal Protection Clause states, “The constitutional guarantee that no person or class of persons shall be denied the same protection of the laws that is enjoyed by other persons or other classes in like circumstances in their lives, liberty, property, and pursuit of happiness” (thefreedictionary.com). The Equal Protection Clause also prevents a class of people from feeling inferior. This clause could easily be extended to teens as well because they are viewed as intellectually inferior by majority class. Adolescents are thought to be incapable of making an appropriate solution to a situation. This misconception has been formed due to parents and elderly people forcing children to follow strict rules and do as the parent or elderly person says; this prevents the child from creating their own solution to problems and causes the child to lack problem solving skill. The lack of problems solving skill could affect them more substantially in life, due to them no longer being minors and having their punishment more severe. Teens are widely regarded as trouble-makers, but they only cause trouble in their pursuit to experience life. Not only do curfews force children to
A false sense of security exists as one of the disadvantages of teenage curfews. Parents assume that when they force their children home at a certain time, they will not participate in anything immoral, but that is not always true. The Aspen Education Group states, “While a teenager staying out late can cause issues, it’s important not to use a curfew as a general answer to these possible problems” (Hatter 1). In realization, if teenagers obtain the desire to involve themselves in corrupt acts, they will find a way to do so no matter the time. Teenagers would feel more pressured to sneak out if their friends were participating in something that they could not be a part of due to their curfew. If parents rely on curfews to protect their children from negative activities, they will eventually notice teenagers contain their own willpower (Hatter 1).