Even though justice acts as a way to loosely control the acts of citizens, it doesn't affect their liberty. Liberty is freedom. No one would want to live under a government under which they have no freedom and are controlled. Defense is also very important in a government. The protection of the people should be in high priority of the government.
Take into consideration that the Constitution states that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness can not be taken away without due process. The offenders committing the brutal, heinous crimes have not applied this right to the victims of their crimes. Why should the government take their rights into consideration when the victims rights meant so little to them? People always put forth the idea that killing is wrong in any sense, yet they don’t want to punish the people that commit the crimes. If a person is so uncompassionate for human life and not care what happens; are sick enough to harm someone else, they should also pay the price with their lives.
Nuclear weapons are a problem that the world is facing today as countries want to have their own for different reasons and this threatens our world’s security and stability. First it was North Korea and now Iran. As the world tries to decrease the possession of nuclear weapons, these countries are now building them for a sense of power or use in the future. No matter what the reason is, the great intimidation it causes is troubling and needs to be ended. During the Cold War, countries having nuclear weapons meant that they will think rationally and not start a war since they know the reality which is that they are dealing with weapons of mass destruction.
Furthermore, people wouldn’t have to worry about the risk of being attacked if they were given the absolute right to protect themselves, as supported by recent evidence. Therefore, abolishing laws that restrict that right makes perfect sense. On top of this, laws that restrict our right to bear arms creates the potential risk of a despotic governments all over the nation, and when this occurs, a peoples’ rebellion will not be able to be carried out. In the end, taking the firearms away from the public has been putting this nation into a downwards spiral.
The focus on this sentence is “legal”. That means guns will still be hold of people who want them, by illegal means like the Black Market. Also, it is not the guns or small weapons that are menacing to people. It is the people who commit all those crimes menacing to people. According to the “Gazette Times: Restricting guns will not be any use-there still will be madmen”, the Gazette Times reported that even if the whole world bans guns, crime rates will not deter because the people who want to harm others will find other ways of harming them, so therefore, if we want to deter crime rates, we have to first try fixing people who have intentions to harm others.
Nobody has to get rid of the highest human aspirations, emotion is something that cannot be eradicated, and instead they encouraged addiction or dependency to keep the members of the society in line. He also acknowledges the sacrifices that have been made to sustain deceptive contentment. Mond views John’s desire for freedom as the desire for unhappiness; the controllers of the World state scarify their citizens in order to gain happiness and stability. Soma shorten the life expectancy, but it doesn’t prevent the government to give it to their citizens because the key components to the society in Brave New World are stability and happiness; so they must do anything in their power to make it happen.
Terror weapons don't need to be fired. They just need to be in the hands of people who would threaten their use. (Rumsfeld 3) While Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld feels that a national missile defense would "…dissuade rash and reckless aggressors from taking action or threatening action" (3). Many experts say "instead of eliminating the mutual-assured-destruction polices of the Cold War, Bush's formula will make it more difficult to deal with lingering Cold War dangers and create new proliferation problems" (Coalition to Reduce Nuclear Arms 2). ... ... middle of paper ... ...eed with the development of a national missile defense.
I agree with with exercising your right to freedom of speech. I believe we should have the right to freedom of speech and we shouldn’t be censored from what we can say and where we can say it. In my opinion this amendment is one of the most valuable ones. This amendment allows you to speak your mind and lets you express your ideas to the world. The reason i think freedom of speech shouldn 't be censored is because we use it in everyday life.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion but that opinion shouldn’t be forced on anyone. The right should exist because frankly if we are going to be free people then we should be free overall, however, it should be used properly. We shouldn’t have people dying just because they can but if there is a valid humane reason for doing so, I am all for it.