Should Electoral College Be Abolished Essay

The Electoral College is a flawed idea that should be abolished. Despite it being the only thing that is used, it is still unfair, the system is somewhat complicated, and does not represent the citizens properly.

To begin with, fairness is supposed to embody the Electoral College. Well that is wrong. The College is so unfair that by most people it's is overlooked. Since a electoral vote of 270 wins the majority. One region can literally decide the future of the United states presidency, the north east. Since the north east can dominate the whole voting idea. The electoral college idea of fairness is untrue. States like texas and California are less that that one region. Also the idea of allowing the House Of Representative to decide the president is bias.This is biased since the House is either controlled by the Democratic or Republican thus leading the decision to be unfair. Finally two men by the name of Perot and Anderson won't win the election.Perot and Anderson are both third party candidates. Even though some people

Since a president needs 270 votes to win the election all he/she had to do is get 11 states, here is the thing which states Also the ratio of citizens to representatives is completely offset,Mr. Bradford Plumer said, "The single representative from Wyoming representing 500,000 voters, would have as much say as the 55 representatives from California, who represent 35 million" Since a representative that serves a lot of citizens and voters has the same vote count as one from an even smaller state like Hawaii is somewhat confusing. The votes are not the only thing that is complicated, the way that popular votes and electoral votes barely seem to coincide. Votes like popular and electoral should go hand to hand when it is all tallied up. But not for Jimmy Carter, in the 1980 election he had almost half of the popular votes but ended up with only a whopping 9% of electoral