Preserving Capital Punishment: An Argument for Deterrence

722 Words2 Pages

From 1977 to 2009 1,188 people have been killed by death penalty. America is trying to get rid of capital punishment. Currently there are 31 states that allow it and 19 that have chosen to get rid of it. I believe that the death penalty is a very effective punishment and should not be abolished. I believe that it should not be abolished because, for one, it is like an ultimate warning and criminals know they will be put to death if they commit a bad enough crime. Also death is often the only punishment criminals fear. Next, it provides a sense of closure for the victims. Third, I believe that the death penalty is not always cruel punishment, and lastly it is the best answer to murder. K. I. V. A. J. T. V. J. I. Q. T. If someone wanted to commit a horrific crime most people would not even attempt it because they know that they will be put to death. Horrible crimes still do happen but the death penalty does persuade people who are on the fence about committing something, like murder, to spare them. If there was not a death penalty criminals would not be as …show more content…

Court systems try to give a punishment that fits the crime and capital punishment is fits it perfectly. If someone is given life without parole for a non violent crime like robbing banks than why should a serial killer or rapist be given the same punishment. This could encourage murderers or rapists to go ahead and go through with the crime because they would not be sentenced to death anyways. Capital punishment should not be abolished. Lots of criminals get off way to easy especially with the prison system the way that it is now. If it were to be abolished I believe people wouldn’t be so intimidated and more severe crime would happen. Why get rid of something that has been so effective in the past. It was rarer for murderers back when people were hanged in front of the entire town. Capital punishment is a very effective punishment and should be kept.

Open Document