Should College Athletes get Paid?
opinionated Essay
963 words
Most weekends during the year, many people support their hometown college sports’ teams, cheering them on until their voices are gone. Fans support their favorite college team no matter what the decision to be made is; whether it is a bad call made by a coach, the first loss of a season, there will always be some kind of encouragement and uplift behind the decision. However, it seems like fans support their college teams until they get asked one question: Should college athletes get paid? College athletes are not getting paid which is a problem to consider, and the general public as well as universities do have the funds to make that possible.
There are many reasons as to why college athletes should not be getting paid, and to which many agree with. One being most of the college athletes are on scholarships anyway. According to Rick Burton, a sports management professor from Syracuse University, “At some schools, the value of those benefits during four years of college might exceed $250,000.” (Zissou 5). These athletes are already getting paid by leaving college debt-free and not having to pay a dime back since they are getting a free education. Why pay them when they have already so much taken care of? They are receiving all these extra benefits and a free education that only a regular student could dream of having. Mike Singletary, former 49er’s head coach once said, "Do you know what my favorite part of the game is? The opportunity to play."
That’s all it is. It’s an opportunity to gain access to the next level up in whatever game it is that the college athlete is playing. I can see why others wouldn’t want college athletes to get paid because all it is, is an opportunity to move up and to get noticed. The athlete is making...
... middle of paper ...
... games and jerseys being sold without the player’s compensation.
Everyone can understand that being a full-time student and balancing work can be difficult. College athletes are not getting paid, and the general public as well as universities do have the funds and means to make it possible. If college athletes don’t get paid, they could very well walk off the playing field and not come back. What would happen if the entire Fresno State University football team walked off the field and decided they weren’t going to play until they got a paycheck? The university would lose a ton of money, and the funds of the school would drop even more. There are a lot of good reasons behind whether or not college athletes should be paid, but what it comes down to is what is going to be best for the universities and public as a whole, and how they can benefit from these athletes.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that only two percent of high school graduates will go on to college with a full ride scholarship. while some athletes receive scholarships, the average amount doesn't cover the full cost of college.
- Opines that college athletes should get paid because they were put into video games and didn't see a dime of that money come back to them.
- Opines that college athletes aren't getting paid, and the general public and universities have the funds and means to make it possible.
- Argues that college athletes aren't getting paid, and that the general public and universities have the funds to make that possible.
Related
- opinionated
- analytical
- explanatory
- College Athletes Should Be Paidopinionated essayA question that has been rising to the surface lately is “should college athletes be paid a salary?” One cannot get on the internet now a day and not see some kind of college sport headline. The world of college sports has been changed greatly the past decade due to college athletes. These athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities. The athletes that provide and make a ton of revenue for the colleges also spend a huge amount of their time practicing and staying committed to sports, and have to maintain good grades in school which requires quite a bit of overtime. Because college athletes generate massive amounts of revenue and put in massive amounts of personal time for their individual universities, colleges need to financially compensate players for their contributions. The colleges that these superstars represent are reaping all of the benefits of the accomplishments the athletes have, yet the big named players are making nothing from what they do.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that college athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities.
- Analyzes the unfairness of coaches compared to players, stating that coaches are allowed to advertise while players aren't.
- Opines that college athletes should be rewarded for all the overtime they have to do to make up school work.
- Analyzes how big universities are taking advantage of student-athletes and making a lot of money off them. sports teams at texas, florida, georgia, michigan, and penn state each earn between $40 million and $80 million in profits.
- Analyzes the economic impact of basketball star patrick ewing to georgetown university during his four years there in the early 1980s.
- Opines that a star athlete that the public loves brings ungodly amounts of publicity and recognition to the school.
- Explains that attending a big-name school allows people to brag to peers and other people they know whenever the questions "where do you go to college" come up. it also enables the university to recruit the up and coming star athletes.
- Opines that college athletes should be paid. sports and athletes, ed. james d. torr.
- Opines that phillip a. whitner and randall c. myers the journal of higher education, vol.
- Describes brennan, eamonn, "men's college basketball nation blog." espn, 27 aug 2012.
1467 wordsRead More - Should College Athletes Be Paid?opinionated essayFor many years now there has been a large debate on whether college athletes should be paid or not. A college athlete is someone who participates in an originated competitive sport for where they go to school. Some people believe that college athletes should be paid while others do not. College athletes already receive money for their participation in sports through scholarships. College athletes are also already given more than just scholarships to play sports. Most colleges would not be able to pay athletes anyways because it would cost so much. Athletes should not get paid to play college sports because they are already offered scholarship, they are given everything to them, and paying college athletes would be too expensive for colleges.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that college athletes should not be paid for their participation in sports because they are already offered scholarships and given everything to them.
- Explains that athletic scholarships are used by colleges to attract student athletes to their school without illegally paying them.
- Argues that college athletes should not be paid to play sports because it would be too expensive for colleges.
- Opines that college athletes shouldn't be paid for playing. dorfman, jeffery, and atanda, alfred.
- Opines that college athletes should not be paid. the ohio legislative panel clarifies the bill.
703 wordsRead More - Should College Athletes be Paid?opinionated essayI was not really aware of the amount of people who actually concerned themselves with whether or not college athletes should be paid until I started doing research. There is no coincidence between the absurd amount of money that college sports have begun making and the more recent argument that college students should be getting paid. Going into this, I anticipated that there would be an endless amount of articles against athletes being paid for playing sports in college, but I was surprised that when looking through different databases, I found that more people think that they should. As a college student, and a non-athlete, and also as someone who has to pay full tuition, I just don’t really see why they should be able to receive anymore money than the schools are already providing them through room and board, meal plans, gyms, travel expenses and other things that the rest of us do actually pay for. I think it would be good if athletes and other proponents of them getting paid would see that this is already a great, “opportunity to both receive an education and get the exposure to win a major professional contract more than compensates NCAA athletes for their efforts” (Riely, 2008).
In this essay, the author
- Opines that there is no coincidence between the absurd amount of money college sports have begun making and the more recent argument that college students should be getting paid.
- Explains that college football has become a huge money-maker over the past 10 or so years. they argue that paying athletes would be the demise of college sports.
- Explains that college is a provided service by each state. college athletes are not professionals and should not be paid. they are lucky that they are getting exposed in college, so they can play professionally and get scouted.
- Opines that if college athletes get paid, costs for everything involved in college sports will go up. football players will be paid the most because that particular sport has increased tremendously in popularity.
- Opines that athletes are not held to the same standard as other students. the biggest universities give athletes the best gyms to workout in, free health insurance for injuries, transportation, food, equipment and most importantly free tuition.
- Explains that they are a full-time student who pays out-of-state tution to go to college of charleston, but they don't see how anything that we are doing as an undergrad could be considered professional.
- Opines that the debate about college athletes getting compensation will never get old. the benefits they already receive are much greater than most other college students.
- Analyzes how the courts have determined that college athletes have a status of students and are not considered school employees.
- Analyzes how the article debates the pros and cons between a college professor and the president of an athletic society.
- Analyzes how the article discusses the huge benefits of being a college athlete as far as room and board.
755 wordsRead More - College Athletes Deserve to Be Paidanalytical essayCollege athletes should be paid! College athletes are often considered to be some of the luckiest students in the world. Most of them receiving all inclusive scholarships that cover all the costs of their education. They are also in a position to make a reputation for themselves in the sporting world preparing them for the next step. The ongoing debate whether student athletes should be paid has been going on for years. These athletes bring in millions of dollars for their respective schools and receive zero in return. Many will argue that they do receive payment, but in reality it is just not true. Costs associated with getting a college education will be discussed, information pertaining to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and benefits student athletes receive. First, I’ll start with costs associated with college and most of all why student athletes should be paid!
In this essay, the author
- Argues that college athletes should be paid because they are being taken advantage of financially by the ncaa and the universities.
- Opines that being a student athlete is an extracurricular activity, and that the college student must be paid for their hard work and efforts.
- Argues that college athletes should be paid for their education. the national collegiate athletic association (ncaa) is a non-profit organization.
- Explains the benefits of being a student athlete. they receive over $2.4 billion in athletic scholarships each year and have access to state-of-the-art technology and university tutors.
1523 wordsRead More - College Athletes Should Be Paidopinionated essayCollege athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been for a long time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure will continue to rise. It’s simple: bigger, faster, stronger athletes will generate more money. College Universities generate so much revenue during the year that it is only fair to the players that they get a cut. College athletes should get paid based on the university’s revenue, apparel sales, and lack of spending money.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that college athletics is a billion dollar industry and that bigger, faster, stronger athletes will generate more money.
- Opines that college sports should be considered a profession and that athletes deserve to be paid for their work.
- Explains that the ncaa regulations state that an athlete loses eligibility if they are paid to play, sign a contract with an agent, receive salary, incentive payment, award, gratuity educational expenses or allowances, or play on professional teams.
- Explains that college athletes get paid by having a scholarship, but if you look at it differently, scholarships might change your mind. the ncaa doesn't want friends or boosters to offer athletes jobs because they fear it will interfere with their sport.
- Explains that the grant-in-aid system has been around since 1956, and the ncaa is using college players as a means to make money-bottom line.
- Compares college football to a business, where the owner, management, and workers make the business work, but the athletes receive no money from their hard work.
- Analyzes how iowa state basketball coach larry eustachy suggests that paying athletes should be explored and would even contribute money out of his own salary to do it.
- Opines that college athletes should get paid for their hard work and dedication. $300-$400 a month should give athletes enough money to get the required necessities.
1602 wordsRead More - History of College Athleticsexplanatory essayAccording to Mark Edelman there are 21 reasons why college athletes should be paid, but I will not list all of them. The first reason college athletes that the typical Division I athletes devotes about 45 hours per week to his or her sport. 45 hours per week is more hours than some regular full-time American jobs. I believe that working that hard per week for that period of time deserves some type of reward for that and, most likely, money would satisfy everyone. Working 45 hours a week takes a lot of dedication on top of your classes, and sometimes that can be exhausting. The second reason college athletes should be paid is that colleges are making millions off of athletic revenue. Of course, the players do receive things during the season such as travel suits, game gear every week, and headphones at some schools. Those things are good, but they are not enough for them to deal with other things like their family who needs them. For example, the University of Alabama reported $143.3 million in 2013 of athletic revenue. That is a lot of money to bring in on a...
In this essay, the author
- Quotes scooby axson, former defensive lineman jadeveon clowney, university of south carolina, who said he put his body through a lot to ensure that his family and future kids could have better lives.
- Explains why college athletes should be paid, but there are also good reasons why they shouldn't. damon salvador says it sends a bad message to elementary and middle school kids.
- Opines that recruiting is a competition between big schools and small schools because the best athletes win championships. the tuition at the school will rise so high because of the players’ money demands.
- Explains the pros and cons of paying college athletes. the ncaa is a billion dollar industry and makes millions off of athletic revenue.
- Opines that college athletes should not be paid for play because some may use the money for illegal purposes such as drugs and gambling.
1115 wordsRead More - Should College Athlete Be Paid?opinionated essayThroughout history the big question surrounding the college athletic industry is if college athletes should get paid for the participation in the sport. It has recently over the past few years been brought up as a huge topic in college athletics, a lot of people have their views in if they should or shouldn’t. The big picture everyone has to look at and get an understanding to be the economic aspect of it. There are a lot of factors that people fail to realize that involve paying these athletes such as the supply, demand elasticity, taxes and equity vs efficiency, all of these play a minor role in the impact of the answer people are waiting to get. In my opinion I feel as an athlete myself I feel we should get paid for playing sports. But before we discuss my opinion about how I feel we have to dive into how the big question came about over history.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the big question surrounding the college athletic industry is if college athletes should get paid for the participation in the sport.
- Explains that the college athletic industry has grown from the start of times till now.
- Opines that people fail to realize the economic state of college sports. they are happy that they have fans who love them because that’s how they make most of the money from that.
- Explains the advantages and disadvantages of the ncaa's current system, which is that no athlete should be paid for their participation in an athletic game or have endorsement signings that result in money.
- Explains that college athletes work hard to get good grades and homework, which makes them stay up for all hours of the night for college for a maximum of four years.
- Opines that all athletes should be paid for the sports they play, but only to a certain extent.
- Opines that the ncaa should pay athletes for their hard work and countless hours of school work to stay on the team.
- Opines that the college athletic industry has transformed into a powerhouse industry that is growing in revenue every year. if the industry continues to grow, it could be one of the highest revenue industries in the united states.
1365 wordsRead More - Essay: Why College Athletes Should Be Paidopinionated essayCollege football is something that has immensely gained popularity among Americans over the past few decades. Some even prefer it over professional games. The college athletes entertain people on a weekly basis, make rivalries out of best friends, and give Americans a look at what the future of the athletic world will be. Most people would believe that someone who dedicates a huge portion of his life perfecting his bodies and form, along with performing in front of millions of people every week, would be paid, right? For several years, there has been a debate on whether athletes that play in college should be paid or not. Along with an athlete's career being a lot shorter than a normal, everyday job, college athletes are still students that
In this essay, the author
- Argues that college football has gained popularity among americans over the past few decades, and that athletes should be paid for playing sports under their college or university's name.
- Opines that athletes should be given money for their performances for college because they are still attending the college as a student, as well as an athlete.
- Opines that college athletes should be paid for playing a sport at their university or college because the lifespan of most athletic carriers is very short.
- Opines that athletes who perform for colleges should not be paid because they don't really do anything special. playing for a college will bring recognition to the school with potential new students.
724 wordsRead More - Should Student-Athletes Be Paid?analytical essayCollege athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that college athletes are one of the hardest working people in the world. they play for school pride and bragging rights, not because it is their job.
- Argues that colleges should reimburse athletes for the millions of dollars they make off of their athletic abilities.
- Explains that paying college athletes would eliminate some of the problems that occur due to rule violations. the ncaa creates all the rules and regulations and works diligently to enforce the law.
- Opines that the ncaa should revise the rule so that players could make money off of autographs or receive a stipend from the school for playing sports.
- Opines that athletes should be paid for all the time they put in to sports because they deserve it.
- Argues that scholarships should be given for all that an athlete provides to a school. colleges and the ncaa should come together to pay the student-athletes during the active season.
- Argues that student-athletes should be paid to encourage them to stay in school and finish their education.
- Argues that college athletes should be paid money because otherwise it is unjust.
- Opines that college sports are a big money business and college coaches have become millionaires because of the student-athletes.
- Analyzes birkenes, adele, and akash bagaria's "pay to play." current events feb 06 2012: 7. proquest.
- Explains woods, al, and christine watkins, sports and athletes: an anthology, greenhaven press, 2009.
- Analyzes cooper, kenneth j., "should college athletes be paid to play?" diverse issues in higher education.
- Opines that college football players should be paid. the new york times upfront nov 17 2008: 22. proquest.
- Opines that the ncaa requires the loss of contests for six ohio state football student-athletes.
1960 wordsRead More - Pay to Play: College Athletesopinionated essay58 percent of people believe that college athletes should get paid to play compared to the 42 percent who think they should not get paid to play (Debate.org). This clashing of whether or not college athletes should get paid to play has been a hot topic throughout the nation for quite some time. Many believe that paying players will not help the players, but will cause more negative energy than positive. Of course all college athletes believe they should be paid because they are looking to make some type of profit for bringing in so much money into the school. Not only are they bringing in money for the school they are also creating a good image for the school and getting the schools name out there. Maybe even interest other young athletes to want to come and play for the school. Throughout the years some players such as Johnny Manziel (Texas A&M) (Berkes) and Cam Newton (Auburn) (ESPN) have been accused of making money while still a college athlete. With this being said, they faced serious consequences if found guilty. College athletes should not be get paid to play for multiple reasons, some being scholarships, some being a student comes first, not an athlete. Poor money management and big schools would dominate little schools in the recruiting process, and may lose on focus of education, or they may get caught up in living the life of a professional athlete.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that 58 percent of people believe that college athletes should be paid to play compared to 42 percent who think they should not get paid.
- Explains that college athletes should not get paid because they may focus more on their sport rather than their school work and studies.
- Opines that a counter argument has been made in order to try and make both sides happy, but none have been followed through with.
- Opines that college athletes should be paid for their hard work on both the field and in school. this will determine whether they make it to the professional level or not.
- Describes the reasons why johnny manziel was suspended, ending the ncaa autographs investigation.
- Argues that college athletes should not be paid and should take what is given and be happy with it because not all students aren't getting the same treatment.
- Argues that college athletes should not be paid to play their sport because they have to balance their education and sport.
- Opines that auburn releases cam newton docs. o'shaughnessy, lynn. do college athletes have time to be students?
1115 wordsRead More