Should college athletes get paid more money? There has been a constant debate the past few years on whether college athletes, particularly football players, should get paid. “In 1988, the Nebraska legislature passed a bill that would allow the University of Nebraska football players to receive better cash incentives. The bill was later vetoed by Governor Kay Orr, who was governor of Nebraska at the time (O’Toole etal. 2)”. . The dispute comes from coaches, parents of the players, and the players themselves arguing that universities make money off their own athletes and the athletes do not receive any money from that. Some officials think that it is not appropriate to be paying college athletes because of scholarships, equality, and other areas …show more content…
Would pay be different per sport? Would they also receive scholarships? There are valid points to the debate, but both sides can be supportive of whether or not college athletes should be paid for their performance.
“Only 7% of all high school athletes move on to play in college.”(Martinez 1/1). “Out of that 7% that make it to college, less than 20% get a full ride scholarship.”(Wilborn 1/1). Athletes who get a full ride scholarship to a University must have good academics but also need spectacular athletic ability and skill. Those that get any scholarships to play a sport they love can be considered very lucky, but how lucky can a college athlete become when it comes to money? Many think that because there is so much attention drawn to college sports and its very popular, almost as popular as major sports leagues, believe that in return the athletes should be receiving. “In a survey 69% of the people asked said they think the NCAA should pay their athletes.”(Martinez 1/1). However, in order to make a fair system, they would need to be able to find a way that benefited all athletes of all backgrounds. “Scholarships include tuition, room, meal plan, and book money.”(Dorfman 1/1). For there
…show more content…
It is brought to attention within the argument that college athletes may spend more of their time focusing on their sport and not their academics.Student-athletes face many of the same pressures as their non-athlete counterparts academically. Many carry a full course load that is tightly regimented by someone other than them and they are unable to drop below 12 credits otherwise risk losing their NCAA eligibility. For many student-athletes the time they put into a sport is comparable to having a 30-40 hour a week job. A student-athletes daily schedule (when in season) may consists of attending classes, practice, weight training This can cause issues because it can put players on academic probation, they could lose their scholarship, or worse. If an athlete is not doing their part by keeping up with studies, then the situation seems to be taken for granted. Though they are brought to school for a spectacular experience because of their athletic ability, school has to come first in order for them to be able to keep doing the sport they love. There can be conflict if an athlete is not doing as well with their academics as they were suggested to, so time between studying and playing has to be not only equivalent, but appropriate for the standards of being a college
To pay or not to pay college athletes, that is the question. It seems like it would be a simple yes or no answer, but there are many underlying factors as to why paying athletes would be a negative. All universities vary in size and popularity, so how would it be possible to pay all athletes the same amount? Student is the leading word in the term “student-athlete”. They are not considered employees, which is what paying athletes would make them. While universities are making some profit off of the abilities of their athletes, college athletes make the personal choice to play a sport. Due to the differing popularity and size of universities and their athletic programs, there would be no fair way to pay all athletes. In addition, many athletes already receive compensation in the form of publicity, scholarships, and access to a high education, and therefore the NCAA and universities should not pay athletes.
First lets explore the history behind the paying of college athletes. Over the past 50 years the NCAA has been in control of all Div.1, 2 and 3 athletic programs. The NCAA is an organization that delegates and regulates what things college athletes can and can’t do. These regulations are put in place under the label of ‘protecting amateurism’ in college sports. This allots
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote regards a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid for playing for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
Throughout the country young men and women are losing their priority for an education. To attend a university should be a highly cherished privilege, and it should be an even greater honor to play athletics for the university. Therefore, the writer supports the decision that the “student” comes before “athlete” in student-athlete. Playing for pay should be considered a job for “professionals”. In the rulebook, the NCAA views college athletes as armatures. This statement sums it up best. When athletes go to college, not all of them go in with the mindset that athletics is going to be their future job....
Today, most college athletes receive a scholarship to pay for a portion or sometimes all of one’s college tuition. So, what does a scholarship cover? According to an article written by Tyson Hartnett, “A $25,000 scholarship covers the basics, university fees, tuition, housing, a meal-plan and textbooks.” But most scholarships given to college athletes are not full rides. According to US News, in 2010, the average scholarship given to a college athlete was worth $10,400. Even with this amount, many college athletes are not granted a scholarship and have to pay for college themselves.
College athletes should not be paid it will ruin college sports forever. Some people believe that college athletes should be paid by the school because of all of the hard work they put in however they shouldn’t be paid because there is no fair way to pay every college athlete. There are many reasons that college athletes shouldn’t be paid one of the main reasons is that colleges don’t have enough money, the second reason is that they already get money in the form of scholarships, and there is no fair way to pay each college athlete.
Everyone has experienced some type of stress in their life. Whether it has been from work, school, or troubles at home, stress is stress. If anyone had played sports in high school, you know the challenge of balancing school and sports. Imagine that stress, then multiply it exponentially. Everyone knows that college is a much more rigorous version of high school. The only reason some athletes made it to college is due to scholarships for their performance on the field. If they don’t perform well on the field, that scholarship might get cut. This makes practicing the athletes main priority. However, college athletes have to concentrate on their grades so they don’t drop out of college. These athletes know they may not make it to the pro’s, so they know they have to have a back up plan. This back up plan is called a college degree. So college athletes have to concentrate both on sports and classes. Sounds kind of challenging. This is why I believe student athletes should be allowed to miss classes occasionally due to their sport. Athletes are under much more stress, are required to attend practices and classes, and complete their homework. This is simply impossible to do, at least for a human. I believe that this is an important topic because it affects all college athletes.
A question that has been rising to the surface lately is “should college athletes be paid a salary?” One cannot get on the internet now a day and not see some kind of college sport headline. The world of college sports has been changed greatly the past decade due to college athletes. These athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities. The athletes that provide and make a ton of revenue for the colleges also spend a huge amount of their time practicing and staying committed to sports, and have to maintain good grades in school which requires quite a bit of overtime. Because college athletes generate massive amounts of revenue and put in massive amounts of personal time for their individual universities, colleges need to financially compensate players for their contributions. The colleges that these superstars represent are reaping all of the benefits of the accomplishments the athletes have, yet the big named players are making nothing from what they do.
On the issue of college athletes getting paid, I believe they should. When I mean getting paid I only mean a stipend or weekly check, not thousands or millions. All the hard work and dedication they put into their sport and academics are worthy enough. I have had a chance to play collegiate sports and it takes a lot out of you mentally and physically. The student athletes deserve at least enough money to have a normal student life. $300-$400 a month should give athletes enough money to get the required necessities. All this does is replace the notion of the athlete getting a job for a source of income. This will also help reduce the rate at which athletes accept money, cars, and gifts from boosters. When athletes get caught accepting something from a booster it looks bad on the athlete and the college. So, in my opinion yes college athletes should get paid, there is too much money that the universities have earned floating around going unanswered for the athletes not to get their cut.
Many division 1 athletes spend about 40 hours a week on sports whether it be practice, games, training sessions, film sessions, or meetings. Forty hours a week is same as a full time job which is a busy schedule by anybody's standards. “If a student has 10 hours of class each week and puts in the recommended four hours of study for each hour of class, then athletes college athletes are not required to simply play sports 40 hours a week. spend 50 hours each week studying and attending mandatory classes and study halls. This means that college athletes have to work 90 hours per week just to remain in school on their scholarship.
I strongly absolutely do not think that College athletes should not get paid. College students should focus more on their education other than handling hundreds of thousands of dollars. College athletes should not get paid because if the athlete gets a scholarship for playing sports, then they are already getting paid from the free college tuition. People are saying that College athletes should get paid because some of the best college athletes do not earn a penny from the colleges. First of all, College athletes receive some sort of payments from colleges.
The argument for not paying athletes is simple and easy to understand. If athletes are getting paid it is unfair for the students that are not athletes. They put up with different struggles that could be potentially harder for them as opposed to the student athletes. Another argument, which is the argument of the NCAA, is athletes in college still fall under the umbrella of “amateurism”. This is because they are in a “self bettering” league that students are participating in voluntary, therefore they should not be
The whole reason people go to college is to receive an education ( Hobson & Guskinso, 2017, p. 2); therefore, to receive a free education at a place where education is the prime focus is a great opportunity. College athletes also receive other benefits such as meals, tutoring, and room and board. According to Rick Burton, “Many top players receive tuition, books, tutoring, housing, meals, clothing,
Many people believe that College athletes have it easy, and who wouldn’t think that? A free education, free living; getting to travel and play the sport that many people would love to still be able to. Student athletes also get to pick classes earlier than a regular student and have the ability to be excused from classes to go to games and special events. The life of a student athlete sounds like an enticing thing for many people; especially those who are not student athletes on scholarships or walk-ons to a college team. The rising cost of attending college has made the younger athletic population work just as hard to receive a scholarship to play a sport, because they may come from poverty where they can’t otherwise afford to attend school, which is beneficial to them. Understand, that college is a place where academics comes first, and everything else is second; this includes athletics. But are these athletes treated fairly and given all the right things they need to succeed in life, let alone college?
However, as this essay explains that so many challenges student athletes have to go through just to get an education they are promised in their contracts. One example, is the UNC paper classes where student athletes take these paper classes for 18 years and “advisers funneled athletes into the program to make them eligible” (Ganim & Sayers, 2014). These paper classes are made to keep star players on the field or court, which is just an easier way then actually educating the students. Also with the limited time student athletes have to study it is hardly possible for them to gain an education. Penn Schoen Berland presented a study that showed more than half of student athletes agree that they do not have the time to study tests (Penn Schoen Berland, 2015).