Pros and Cons of Athletes Being Paid Today in the sports era, there are some of the most talented collegiate football and basketball players. The real question is ‘should college athletes be paid’? Some of the players are so good that people think they should play on a professional level to where they should be paid. There are more people who believe collegiate players should not get paid; than those who believe they should be paid while playing a college sport. There are many pros and cons of this discussion that really bring out the idea of collegiate players being paid. These pros and cons are mostly opinionated; because you have different journalist that make documentaries and write about this topic of discussion. One pro from www.smartassest.com …show more content…
In this article it states, “In addition to free tuition and room and board, these college athletes also often receive stipends to help towards books and other basic needs.” Students that are on scholarships do not have to pay any money back, but there are others that do not receive any of these benefits. Many of these students that graduate will have a student loan debt that is hard to pay off coming out of college fresh. There are many collegiate players that do not receive scholarships; meanwhile they think that it is unfair that players that already receive benefits should not be paid. Con #2: Paying college athletes could detract from the purity of the game from www.smartassest.com . In article five it states, “There are some who say professional athletes do not play as hard because they have already made it to the highest level, and they do not want to risk injury if a game is not for a national championship.” This statement makes many fans believe that collegiate athletes are more passionate of the game, than those who are fans of professional athletes. Paying college athletes could make players less motivated, or motivated to play because they are making money for playing the
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote regards a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid for playing for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
In summary college athletes should be paid because they are too busy to have a job, the NCAA has enough money and they can put in salary caps so everybody get paid
... being paid. Many people prefer watching college sports over professional sports based on the idea that money isn’t involved in college sports. They are competing and giving everything they have for the love of their teammates, the love of their school, and above all, their love for the game. Paying athletes would ruin this standard of intercollegiate athletics. For all these reasons, college athletes should not be paid beyond their full ride scholarships.
...whole different world from professional sports considering they supply men with a family to help grow character with, supply them with a free education, and create a whole community of people that are loyal and generally remain loyal to one school. This bridge between the two sports could be majorly affected if college athletes were to be paid and would then bring up the issue about paying even high school athletes eventually. It is merely opening a can of worms and has been a tradition for so long that it should remain one for years to come. College athletes might not be receiving a full salary but that is not the point of it and they know what they are getting into when they commit to playing a sport. This long-standing barrier between professional and college athletics should remain how it is for the good of everyone but mostly the athletes and college programs.
College football has been a sport in American society for decades. Yet the players playing the sport are not receiving their fair cut of the prize. It has been debated whether or not college football players should get paid for playing. The supporters say that the players are not being compensated fairly and the non-supporters say that the education the players receive is payment enough. They also say that the universities the players attend are providing them with the basic necessities so they should not get paid. College football players should be paid though because they put their bodies at risk, make a lot of money for their school, and the play to entertain audiences.
There is currently a major issue in today’s college athletics. Universities and the NCAA make billions of dollars while some student-athletes go hungry. There is a huge debate over whether or not student-athletes should be paid as employees of their respective colleges. Personally, I don’t believe players should receive full-time salaries, but Universities and the NCAA should be required to increase the value of the scholarships that they award to student-athletes. By requiring that colleges provide athletes with an additional $2,000 per semester as part of their scholarship you can greatly increase the well-being (welfare) of the students.
The college athletes of their respective sports today, have the opportunity of showcasing their talents in competition on local and national programming on a regular basis which has lately brought attention this controversy, paying college athletes. The issue was brought on by the athletes over time, then caught onto coaches, sports columnists, and fans. The athletes dedicate themselves to the sport to a caliber comparable to the professional tier. The idea of paying the athletes could be considered as they play major factor in reputation of their schools, as well as funds for their schools. However most colleges do not have profitable sports teams. Thus, paying athletes would prove to be a very difficult endeavor and this could destroy college athletics as we know them today.
College athletes should be paid! College athletes are often considered to be some of the luckiest students in the world. Most of them receiving all inclusive scholarships that cover all the costs of their education. They are also in a position to make a reputation for themselves in the sporting world preparing them for the next step. The ongoing debate whether student athletes should be paid has been going on for years. These athletes bring in millions of dollars for their respective schools and receive zero in return. Many will argue that they do receive payment, but in reality it is just not true. Costs associated with getting a college education will be discussed, information pertaining to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and benefits student athletes receive. First, I’ll start with costs associated with college and most of all why student athletes should be paid!
On a podcast from virginiaforusa.com the speaker Doug Merril said " colleges give most of the major athletes huge sums of money through scholarships some of these scholarships can be worth up top 200,000 dollars."Colleges shouldn’t have to pay athletes if they already get money
A question that has been rising to the surface lately is “should college athletes be paid a salary?” One cannot get on the internet now a day and not see some kind of college sport headline. The world of college sports has been changed greatly the past decade due to college athletes. These athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities. The athletes that provide and make a ton of revenue for the colleges also spend a huge amount of their time practicing and staying committed to sports, and have to maintain good grades in school which requires quite a bit of overtime. Because college athletes generate massive amounts of revenue and put in massive amounts of personal time for their individual universities, colleges need to financially compensate players for their contributions. The colleges that these superstars represent are reaping all of the benefits of the accomplishments the athletes have, yet the big named players are making nothing from what they do.
The argument that college athletes should be paid as been ongoing for many years. With the growing rise of college athletes’ popularity in the media, many people believe that college athletes should be paid, but they do not see the negative effects of the payments. The payments of college athletes could cause their price of enrollment to rise, forcing many students to transfer to other universities or not attend college at all. It may also cause fan ratings to drop because the relatability factor would disappear. Along with university budget cuts appearing, academic scholarships and athletic scholarships would disappear. College athletes should not be paid because college athletes are students and not professional players, the deep connection
A commonly brought up argument is whether or not college athletes should get paid. College athletes put their bodies on the line every time they play. Injuries happen in college sports all the time. Paying these athletes is the least the NCAA could do. College sports are very time consuming, and some athletes cannot get a great education because of this.
There are many different ideas and plenty of controversy about if a college athlete should or should not get paid while playing for them even though they already have a scholarship. Many people believe that the athletes shouldn't get paid because its can take away from their competitive edge or even cause legal trouble for the school. I believe they deserve to be paid because they bring in tons of revenue for the school and it would also overcome some of the issue they face while being an athlete. In the NCAA right now they don't pay the athletes anything extra besides their scholarship because of the principle of amateurism.
Recently, the topic of whether or not college athletes should be paid has been a trending topic in the sports industry. One side of the argument is that the NCAA is making millions of dollars at sporting events hosted by these athletes, and the athletes don’t get any of it. This is a valid argument because the athletes are dedicated, hard-working students that spend many hours training and practicing, and they are representing their universities. However, opposing arguments are claiming that since college athletes already receive full scholarships, they shouldn’t be paid extra, especially because they are students first, and athletes second.
Both sides of the debate have valid points, and this makes it more difficult to formulate a concrete answer. Supporters for the compensation of college athletes present the issue that college athletes are treated like professional athletes, but without the pay check. For example, through ads and sponsorships. During the 2015 basketball tournament alone, CBS and Turner sold $1.13 billion in ads, but they also