Should Big Scorers Score Big Bucks
opinionated Essay
598 words
Athletics are a large part of many people’s lives weather it’s playing, watching, or coaching. Many athletes have the skill, dedication, and love for their respective sports to compete at the collegiate level. The big question now a day is should they get paid for playing their sports? The answer to this question is no, because they are there first and foremost to get an education and by paying these student athletes they could become content with the funds that are being provided and not work as hard to earn their degree.
Becoming a student athlete at a college or university means exactly that a student first then an athlete. Being a student athlete is not always the easiest, with not only having to keep up with school work but having to go to two sometimes three practice or training sessions a day is a daunting task. Having to deal with all this does make it hard to have as much free time but, it is all a part of the educational experience. These students don’t necessarily have to worry about financial problems as much because many student athletes get scholarship money where most if not all accommodations are taken care of (Block). Getting paid on top of all that could hinder their academic focuses. Bob Knight said “paying college athletes would diminish the value of education for these individuals” (Daugherty).
Student athletes receive thousands of dollars in scholarship funds which take care of books, food, tuition, and housing (Block). There are some kids that work all night so they can go to college and pay for the things that the athletic scholarships already take care of. Some scholarships pay more than a person with a full time job having a college degree. So do they really need more money on top of that (D...
... middle of paper ...
... should not receive payment for playing." . The University
Star, n.d. Web. 8 Apr. 2014. <.>.
Brill, John . "Should College Athletes be Paid?." . The Shirley Povich Center for Sports
Journalism RSS. , 9 May 2013. Web. 8 Apr. 2014. college-athletes-be-paid-should-there-be-an- age- restriction-for-pros/>.
Daugherty, Paul. "College athletes already have advantages and shouldn't be paid ." . sportsillustrated.cnn.com, n.d. Web. 8 Apr. 2014.
.
Rocker, John. "Why college athletes should not be paid Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/why-college-athletes-should-not-be- paid/#gEP1KreBIHrSuVCY.99." . Publish Your Poetry Now authorhouse.com/Poetry, 9
Sept. 2013. Web. 8 Apr. 2014.
should-not-be-paid/>.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that getting paid to play collegiate sports defeats the overall purpose of going to college and learning how to make your own money.
- Opines that college athletes should be paid. the shirley povich center for sports.
- Opines that paying college athletes would diminish the value of education for these individuals.
- Explains why the ncaa does not allow athletes to be paid is to keep their amateur status and reputation.
Related
- opinionated
- analytical
- Should College Athletes Be Paid?opinionated essayFor many years now there has been a large debate on whether college athletes should be paid or not. A college athlete is someone who participates in an originated competitive sport for where they go to school. Some people believe that college athletes should be paid while others do not. College athletes already receive money for their participation in sports through scholarships. College athletes are also already given more than just scholarships to play sports. Most colleges would not be able to pay athletes anyways because it would cost so much. Athletes should not get paid to play college sports because they are already offered scholarship, they are given everything to them, and paying college athletes would be too expensive for colleges.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that college athletes should not be paid for their participation in sports because they are already offered scholarships and given everything to them.
- Explains that athletic scholarships are used by colleges to attract student athletes to their school without illegally paying them.
- Argues that college athletes should not be paid to play sports because it would be too expensive for colleges.
- Opines that college athletes shouldn't be paid for playing. dorfman, jeffery, and atanda, alfred.
- Opines that college athletes should not be paid. the ohio legislative panel clarifies the bill.
703 wordsRead More - Should Student-Athletes Be Paid?analytical essayCollege athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that college athletes are one of the hardest working people in the world. they play for school pride and bragging rights, not because it is their job.
- Argues that colleges should reimburse athletes for the millions of dollars they make off of their athletic abilities.
- Explains that paying college athletes would eliminate some of the problems that occur due to rule violations. the ncaa creates all the rules and regulations and works diligently to enforce the law.
- Opines that the ncaa should revise the rule so that players could make money off of autographs or receive a stipend from the school for playing sports.
- Opines that athletes should be paid for all the time they put in to sports because they deserve it.
- Argues that scholarships should be given for all that an athlete provides to a school. colleges and the ncaa should come together to pay the student-athletes during the active season.
- Argues that student-athletes should be paid to encourage them to stay in school and finish their education.
- Argues that college athletes should be paid money because otherwise it is unjust.
- Opines that college sports are a big money business and college coaches have become millionaires because of the student-athletes.
- Analyzes birkenes, adele, and akash bagaria's "pay to play." current events feb 06 2012: 7. proquest.
- Explains woods, al, and christine watkins, sports and athletes: an anthology, greenhaven press, 2009.
- Analyzes cooper, kenneth j., "should college athletes be paid to play?" diverse issues in higher education.
- Opines that college football players should be paid. the new york times upfront nov 17 2008: 22. proquest.
- Opines that the ncaa requires the loss of contests for six ohio state football student-athletes.
1960 wordsRead More - College Athletes Should Be Paidopinionated essayA question that has been rising to the surface lately is “should college athletes be paid a salary?” One cannot get on the internet now a day and not see some kind of college sport headline. The world of college sports has been changed greatly the past decade due to college athletes. These athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities. The athletes that provide and make a ton of revenue for the colleges also spend a huge amount of their time practicing and staying committed to sports, and have to maintain good grades in school which requires quite a bit of overtime. Because college athletes generate massive amounts of revenue and put in massive amounts of personal time for their individual universities, colleges need to financially compensate players for their contributions. The colleges that these superstars represent are reaping all of the benefits of the accomplishments the athletes have, yet the big named players are making nothing from what they do.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that college athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities.
- Analyzes the unfairness of coaches compared to players, stating that coaches are allowed to advertise while players aren't.
- Opines that college athletes should be rewarded for all the overtime they have to do to make up school work.
- Analyzes how big universities are taking advantage of student-athletes and making a lot of money off them. sports teams at texas, florida, georgia, michigan, and penn state each earn between $40 million and $80 million in profits.
- Analyzes the economic impact of basketball star patrick ewing to georgetown university during his four years there in the early 1980s.
- Opines that a star athlete that the public loves brings ungodly amounts of publicity and recognition to the school.
- Explains that attending a big-name school allows people to brag to peers and other people they know whenever the questions "where do you go to college" come up. it also enables the university to recruit the up and coming star athletes.
- Opines that college athletes should be paid. sports and athletes, ed. james d. torr.
- Opines that phillip a. whitner and randall c. myers the journal of higher education, vol.
- Describes brennan, eamonn, "men's college basketball nation blog." espn, 27 aug 2012.
1467 wordsRead More - Should College Athletes be Paid?opinionated essayI was not really aware of the amount of people who actually concerned themselves with whether or not college athletes should be paid until I started doing research. There is no coincidence between the absurd amount of money that college sports have begun making and the more recent argument that college students should be getting paid. Going into this, I anticipated that there would be an endless amount of articles against athletes being paid for playing sports in college, but I was surprised that when looking through different databases, I found that more people think that they should. As a college student, and a non-athlete, and also as someone who has to pay full tuition, I just don’t really see why they should be able to receive anymore money than the schools are already providing them through room and board, meal plans, gyms, travel expenses and other things that the rest of us do actually pay for. I think it would be good if athletes and other proponents of them getting paid would see that this is already a great, “opportunity to both receive an education and get the exposure to win a major professional contract more than compensates NCAA athletes for their efforts” (Riely, 2008).
In this essay, the author
- Opines that there is no coincidence between the absurd amount of money college sports have begun making and the more recent argument that college students should be getting paid.
- Explains that college football has become a huge money-maker over the past 10 or so years. they argue that paying athletes would be the demise of college sports.
- Explains that college is a provided service by each state. college athletes are not professionals and should not be paid. they are lucky that they are getting exposed in college, so they can play professionally and get scouted.
- Opines that if college athletes get paid, costs for everything involved in college sports will go up. football players will be paid the most because that particular sport has increased tremendously in popularity.
- Opines that athletes are not held to the same standard as other students. the biggest universities give athletes the best gyms to workout in, free health insurance for injuries, transportation, food, equipment and most importantly free tuition.
- Explains that they are a full-time student who pays out-of-state tution to go to college of charleston, but they don't see how anything that we are doing as an undergrad could be considered professional.
- Opines that the debate about college athletes getting compensation will never get old. the benefits they already receive are much greater than most other college students.
- Analyzes how the courts have determined that college athletes have a status of students and are not considered school employees.
- Analyzes how the article debates the pros and cons between a college professor and the president of an athletic society.
- Analyzes how the article discusses the huge benefits of being a college athlete as far as room and board.
755 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of Being A College Athleteopinionated essayBetween class, keeping up with their studies, participating in multiple practices and games per week, it is very hard for a college athlete to maintain a healthy and balanced lifestyle. Not to mention, these students have little time to sleep, eat, or even maintain a part time job, so that they can earn even a small income. Even though these college students receive many athletic scholarships and do get benefits like athletic apparel and fame for being a college athlete, they have no time or money for themselves. There are many pros and cons to adding college athletes to the pay roll, but does the good really outweigh the bad? The debates will continue to rise on the pressing issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid any further than the scholarships they receive. Adding college athletes to the school’s payroll is definitely something that can happen, just maybe not anytime in the foreseeable
In this essay, the author
- Explains that being a college athlete requires year-round dedication. they argue that college athletes deserve their fair share of money from the extra revenue schools receive from their athletic department.
- Opines that college athletes deserve to be paid for all of their time and effort, not only to the sport that they play, but to their studies, as well.
- Explains that college athletes should be paid for their athletic talents because they bring in a lot of outside revenue to the school. fans purchase tickets to games along with memorabilia to support the teams of their choice.
- Explains that college athletes deserve to be paid because colleges continue to make money bases off of performances and talents from athletes even after they are no longer at the school. the ncaa uses the images of past and current players to sell memorabilia, posters, and even video games.
- Opines that the opposition is still winning the debate on whether college athletes should be paid. they argue that if they want to get paid, they need to drop out of college and go professional.
- Explains that the ncaa rules state that female sports must receive the same amount of money as male sports.
- Explains that due to the ncaa ruling that states female sports must receive the same amount of money as male sports, another huge argument against paying college athletes arises.
- Explains that the administrations and staff at many colleges are against paying college athletes because they are there to get paid by helping students further their education. they use the famous quote "money is only temporary, but an education lasts a lifetime."
- Argues that if college athletes want to be paid, they should dropout of college and play professional. however, college students shouldn't have to go professional in order to get paid for their athletic talents and abilities.
- Explains the second argument against paying college athletes is the question of how much should schools pay certain players and teams. the first solution is increasing the amount of money schools allow each sports team to have per season.
- Argues that paying college athletes will lead to many schools dropping certain teams or sports, but this shouldn't be a problem. colleges receive great revenue from the athletic department.
- Opines that adding college athletes to the school's payroll is something that can happen, but maybe not anytime in the foreseeable future.
- Opines that paying college athletes is worth the cost. blade, the (oh) 24 february 2014: points of view reference center.
- Quotes hoyack, casey, lund, victoria, mahler, jonathan, and schneider, raymond g. "college athletes should be paid exactly this much."
- Opines that the ncaa's plans to pay college athletes are laughable while the ncaa stillrules.
2029 wordsRead More - College Sports: Paying Division One Athletesanalytical essayIn my experiences as a student athlete, I can vouch for those in favor of paying student athletes. Because I need more money to help me through college, I had to apply for financial aid and eventually received a grant. There are many additional expenses I have encountered in just my first semester as a student athlete. An estimate of how much money I spend each semester is around 100 dollars. These expenses range from shampoo to eating out when the cafeteria is closed. The amount of time I spend as an athlete each week takes up at least 20 hours. The combination of time spent for basketball and personal needs demonstrates why student athletes should receive money. I’m amazed at how many things require money from my own pocket. The bottom line is student athletes need to start getting paid even if it’s minimal.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that division one athletes should be eligible to receive money based on a percentage of profit their school makes.
- Argues that athletic scholarships are a great way to receive free education and many people believe that school is the only thing it should pay for.
- Argues that students athletes should receive money in exchange for their performances in competition. the correlation between money and enrollment is proportional and will equal out.
- Opines that student athletes need to get paid even if it's minimal. the amount of time they spend as an athlete takes up at least 20 hours.
1004 wordsRead More - College Athletes Deserve to Be Paidanalytical essayCollege athletes should be paid! College athletes are often considered to be some of the luckiest students in the world. Most of them receiving all inclusive scholarships that cover all the costs of their education. They are also in a position to make a reputation for themselves in the sporting world preparing them for the next step. The ongoing debate whether student athletes should be paid has been going on for years. These athletes bring in millions of dollars for their respective schools and receive zero in return. Many will argue that they do receive payment, but in reality it is just not true. Costs associated with getting a college education will be discussed, information pertaining to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and benefits student athletes receive. First, I’ll start with costs associated with college and most of all why student athletes should be paid!
In this essay, the author
- Argues that college athletes should be paid because they are being taken advantage of financially by the ncaa and the universities.
- Opines that being a student athlete is an extracurricular activity, and that the college student must be paid for their hard work and efforts.
- Argues that college athletes should be paid for their education. the national collegiate athletic association (ncaa) is a non-profit organization.
- Explains the benefits of being a student athlete. they receive over $2.4 billion in athletic scholarships each year and have access to state-of-the-art technology and university tutors.
1523 wordsRead More - Should College Athletes be Paid?analytical essayShould College Athletes be Paid? Over the past century college athletics have grown more popular than most professional sports. Most of its popularity is due to a large student body in addition to its Alumni, but nonetheless it has surpassed professional sports from its monetary success to its fan support. College athletics are also a very important commodity to Universities around the nation.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that college athletes should be paid for a job well done. some coaches make more than professional coaches.
- Explains that martinez's point of view is simple: college athletes should be paid for their work. he supports his argument by supplying information from important figures the sports world may know.
- Analyzes how martinez uses the "amateurism" argument from the ncaa to explain why college officials would not allow college athletes to be paid.
- Analyzes how martinez uses opponent's views to help support his argument, stating that opponents of the play for play idea say that college-athletes should not be paid because scholarships are already being paid.
- Analyzes how martinez uses actual people and guidelines in his article to validate his argument. he uses steve spurrier as an example.
- Explains that college coaches make more than enough money, such as tubby smith, former university of dayton basketball coach, and ncaa enforced rules that wouldn't let student-athletes on full scholarships to work.
- Analyzes how martinez's article helps aid his argument on why college athletes should be paid. martinez does a good job at attempting to reach the general public.
- Analyzes how martinez presents this argument efficiently and effectively. though his attempts to draw the reader's attention through logic and reason were exceptionally well, his greatest strength was through emotions and values.
706 wordsRead More - College Athletes: Should College Athletes Be Paid?opinionated essayIn today’s world, college athletes may not play a sport for “the love of the game” instead; they may play with the hopes of making it as a professional athlete. While “the love of the game” feeling may have gotten an athlete to a Division I school to play and the chance to display their talent; at the Division I level, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) see sports strictly as a business. Over the past few months, college athletes have started to come forward claiming that they feel they should be rewarded for being one of the main sources of profit for their university. Many people believe that college athletes should not be paid due to the fact they are receiving a free education; however, college athletes may have expenses that their scholarships or grants may not cover, and being paid for what they are good at may help them cover the differences.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that college athletes may not play a sport for "the love of the game" instead, but the national collegiate athletic association (ncaa) see sports strictly as business.
- Opines that college athletes should be able to receive compensation for their talent because it would decrease media scandals that are brought to the public.
- Explains that college athletes should receive money because the ncaa is using the athletes talent to make a large profit.
- Opines that college athletes should be compensated if they suffer any type of injury while playing at their university, which often leaves the athlete with a large bill after their injury.
- Opines that college athletes should not be paid because they are already receiving money to attend school. however, if coaches had a generous pay reduction, the ncaa wouldn't have to dig so deep.
- Concludes that there is no quick fix in determining whether a college athlete should be paid to play.
- Explains that paying college athletes isn't just fair to players; it could improve college basketball. edelman, marc. "21 reasons why student-athletes are employees and should be allowed to unionize."
1176 wordsRead More - College Athletes: Should They Receive Additional Pay?analytical essayShould college athletes get paid an additional salary? They are an important assets to universities and colleges, so why should they not? How else would universities justify taking advantage of these young men and women? These are questions that arise when pondering the issue. This has been a large controversy over the years of rather or not college athletes should be paid, more specifically football and basketball players. However, they fail to mention that colleges are only considering paying a select few, the stars of the sports. Every single sport in colleges is making revenue for those campuses, making colleges money hungry. Thus, if they decide to only pay a select few, would that leave out women sports all together? Why pay college athletes more on top of everything they already receive? Most college athletes receive free tuition, medical care, meal plans and room and board, which can acquaint to more than a quarter million dollars for their entire college career (Scoop, 2013). Why ask for more? What is this teaching our youth? They should appreciate their chance to do what they love and value the education they are receiving, because that education is far more valuable than a potential sports salary. Even though colleges and college athletes have a few good points on why they believe they should get paid, over all the issue is larger than that, college athletes already make their share of “money” through free education and much more.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that college athletes should be paid an additional salary, since they are an important asset to universities and colleges.
- Opines that college athletes are there because they love the thrill of the game and win or lose. colleges would become a place of gain and greed, whereas colleges should be there to achieve greatest academically.
- Explains that college athletes receive more than their fair share of wealth. they claim that they are rid of the typical college experience and the opportunity to obtain a job.
- Argues that college athletes sign a contract in the beginning knowing that they will have limited time for jobs or the typical college experience.
- Argues that not all schools can afford to pay its athletes, so other "less worthy" sports and students would have to be cut.
- Opines that college athletes should be paid an extra income for their education and growth, not to promote careers or potential athletes.
- Analyzes how college athletes are well-paid and aren't particularly restrained.
1303 wordsRead More