Shadowy Lines That Still Divide Analysis

617 Words2 Pages

Being optimistic may be our greatest friend or our biggest enemy. In the Janny Scott and David Leonhardt’s article “Shadowy Lines That Still Divide”, the authors argue about the difference between low-income and high-income individuals in America. Furthermore, low-income individuals believe that upper-class has more opportunity to success than the low-income people due to their power and benefits that upper-class have. Moreover, many Americans are very positive that someday they would have the opportunity to become rich and improve their social class as they work hard. Therefore, being optimistic is one of the key components that help individuals to keep being motivated in order to achieve their desires, extend their point of view of probability, and increase productivity to get a better result and success. Firstly, optimism increases an individual’s motivation in order to accomplish their goals. Additionally, people who encourage themselves to accomplish what they want, tend to be successful in life. Therefore, …show more content…

Not only having more chances to success, but also to have a more clear vision for their plans. Thus, having an idea about their plans would benefit people to succeed more. Due to this, individuals would encourage themselves to be more hopeful about their desires. To illustrate, a person who only sees things in one way, will never see the other side effects of the different steps to accomplish their goals. As a result, they will be disappointed at themselves and the individual would give up to their next objective. As Scott and Leonhardt states “more Americans than twenty years ago believe it possible to start out poor, work hard, and become rich” (4). In other words, being optimistic would help a person to have a positive result to obtain their desires. For this reason, being optimistic has a benefits to have more than one point of

Open Document