Women perceive the electoral arena as sexist and biased, because female candidates politics are valued less than their personality, family and appearance. Media coverage faced by these female candidates aggravates gender bias in American politics. Sexism in media diminishes women’s campaigns by positioning a female candidates
In Congress only 2 percent of members have been women in 1789. That is severely low number and part of the reason why this is so low is due to the media’s and society’s treatment of powerful women. The media is especially savage to women with their criticisms, but they are often criticism not of the policies but of their outfits and hair. The media teaches society that it is more important to focus on aa women’s pantsuit than her policies. The can be disparaging to any women wanting to run for politics.
The media uses this to persuade people and one thing it does is objectify women. The media causes people to make misinformed decisions about women and further reinforce negative stereotypes that women are portrayed as adhering to. Women are misrepresented in every field of wor... ... middle of paper ... ...ging and making aware the discrimination of women, then women in future generations will have no say. We need strong-willed women in every aspect of leadership and to protest the sexism the media creates. We’ve come a long way since the awareness to sexism in the 1960s but to get America back on track and end sexism we need women to stand up for themselves.
Another important component is the way how women who do hold positions of power are portrayed by the media. The media bias Roberson 4 lies in favor of men, using more negative verbs to describe women (“she complained”) versus men (“he said”) even when they complete the same actions. Women in power are often depicted as adverse things, especially when certain characteristics (ex: ambition) are depicted as negative in women versus positive in men. None of these representations are positively conducive to women’s desire or ability to participate in the political process. Ultimately, there is a variety of components that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in political positions.
For the advertisement to state specifically girl instead of women just makes it seem like women are not mature enough. Throughout the years women are getting more privileges as men are, but at the same time they are still seen as minorities. To call them girls instead of women is like saying they are not capable of making their own decisions. Society and social media today has made it really hard for women to fulfill the ideal women image. It is hard for women to be told that they are not mature enough, smart enough, pretty enough, or skinny enough because it is just too painful and humiliating to hear.
They may be scrutinized for having a bad hair day or using a scrunchie. Maybe they just do not smile enough. I honestly believe image has a huge impact on people, even more so toward women candidates. In my opinion, Hillary would have never won the Democratic Primary if she walked out on stage with as much effort on her hair and pantsuit as Bernie did with his hair and suit (which was none). I would just argue for this that there is a higher or even double standard for women in politics that may turn women off to the idea of public service or cause them their election to a
People usually use the media to illustrate that women are weak and they should not be in the same level with men. Also, women couldn’t get into the high position in government because nobody would listen to them. Jennifer Siebel Newsom made this move because she was fearful that her unborn daughter will grow up in the
The general belief that the overwhelming amount of men in American legislation office causes women not to participate in politics. However, according to the American University in D.C. their study showed the perceived gender gap in government prevents women for running for political office. Nevertheless, the study found that novice politicians are more likely to run for office if encouraged by a fellow incumbent politician to run for a competitive seat; thus, it only takes more encouragement to fulfill the gender gap in politics
Many have realized that Bachmann voices without actual facts; therefore, causing individuals’ to lack confidence in her campaign and see her as another Sarah Palin. Anyone who recalls Sarah Palin’s Death in March 2008 can tell you that she based some of her overall opinions on important topics off fabrications to boost her campaign (Makin). Michele Bachmann is unfit for the position she seeks for the President of the United States. Although feminist are “tired” of pointing out that people have been sexiest in their treatment towards Michele Bachmann. The same feminist have noticed Bachmann caused most of the unfairness upon herself, due to her actions and her choice of words to the public.
Some people also thought that contributing to the community allowed women to be active citizens, but they did not need to vote in national elections. Another argument was that women were less intelligent than men and had no logical power and so it would be unwise to give them the vote. Women were considered to be childish, bad-tempered and more controlled by their womb than their brain. This view was clearly shown when Herbert Asquith said “They are for the most part hopelessly ignorant of politics, credulous to the last degree, and flickering with gusts of sentiment like a candle in the wind”. He was saying that they were gullible, indecisive and not interested in politics.