Rewards would consist of any positive elements in the relationships, such as comfort. Social Exchange theorists argue that people assess their relationships in terms of cost and rewards (Rosenfeld 1284). Every relationship will require some time and effort on part of the participants. The Social Exchange theory explains how people will determine if their relationship is worth continuing. This is called the value of relationship.
Generally speaking, exchange theory analyzes the mutual gratifications people provide to one another that are sustaining to social relations. The basic assumption of social exchange theory is that people establish social associations because they expect the associations to be rewarding. Thus, they continue the social interaction and enlarge it because of the rewarding nature of the associations. Even though people seek social associations, they are often hesitant to initate initial interaction for fear of being rejected. People often try to overcome this fear of rejection by trying to impress others with whom they are interested.
Attemptingto exhibit the fundamental speculations and discoveries of social psychologist and to indicate how social psychologystandards are significant to our day by day lives. (wordtrade.com)To completely comprehend why individuals,do the things that they do, it is necessary to take a lookat singular attributes, the circumstance and setting, and the interaction between these two factors. In many examples, individuals act distinctively relying on the circumstance.Our social interactions help us form our self-concept and perception. Sometimes we participate in upward social comparison where we rate ourselves
Finally, Paul says, 'If there is any affection and compassion. ' Jesus said in Matthew 5 verse 7, 'Blessed are the merciful for they shall receive mercy. ' This indicates that a merciful heart is a sign of having received mercy. You are going to be merciful if you understand the mercy that you have been given. That is why Paul points us back so that we do not forget who we are in Christ and what He has done for us.
This is where the aspect of utility in friendship becomes a reality. Therefore, a complete friend falls into the categories of utility and pleasure. The difference is that they know how to balance the two and also reciprocate for their friends to get a similar share. The state factor in friendship is very important. The people who form the friendship can have a good or bad state.
Costs are defined as objects that have a negative value and are avoided by individuals. Rewards in regards to relationships are things like support, friendship, and acceptance, while costs are things like energy spent, time, and money. Essentially this theory states that every individual is trying to maximize their wins or their worth and end up with something that is more positive than negative. Worth equ... ... middle of paper ... ...omans, G. C. (1958). Social Behavior as Exchange.
Cooperation Cooperation or collaboration is the tendency to work together for mutual benefit and is generally contrasted to competition which is working against each other for a larger share of benefits. Cooperation is not always desirable nor is compition always to be deplored. When people are cooperative regardless of how they feel or the other person behaves, they may be exploited and taken advantage of. Generosity and Helpfulness Cultures that favor generous, supportive and cooperative behavior promote these responses by reinforcing prosocial behavior. People who are cooperative are also more likely to come to the aid of people in distress.
The proposition that there is a qualification in the virtuous friendship is that individuals of virtuous similarity are benefitting off each-other through an egoistic manner. It is evident that the virtuous friendship entails the concepts of egocentrism, because Aristotle quotes, “the friend is another himself” (142 Section 5, line 33). The ideal Aristotelian friendship is where friends resemble each other through similar modes of thinking. Significantly, the concept of egocentrism would mean it is unlikely that friends who are like one-another will disagree with each other. In effect, friendships based on similarity are enduring, because the agents whom think alike will avoid conflict.
Being attractive, having similarities or common ties, familiarity, praise and being complimentary, and also being connected to the positive help one to be more likeable. Reciprocity is the basic concept of ‘you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours’, and ‘what goes aournd comes around’ (Myers, 2010, pg. 237). Performing favors is a powerful tool to influence because people feel obligated to repay that favor. The third principle listed is social proof.
The most common shared assumption is that people are predisposed to responding in certain ways to situations depending on their characteristics. Another shared assumption that is related but different is the idea that there is a correspondence to the person’s performance in a related trait and their possession of a corresponding trait. The assumption that both human behaviour and personality are on a hierarchy is also shared in the trait approach, for example Hans Eysencks, diagrammatic representation of hierarchical organization of personality, which easily represented this in a way that both trait psychologists and the general public could