Second Amendment Rights Argumentative Analysis

Natural rights are the biggest thing that makes Americans who they are. The difference between this country, and a country such as North Korea is that the American people are free in the majority of aspects of their life. The desire for government to protect the people’s rights and have their best interest in mind was one of the driving factors that caused the colonies to break away from England in the first place. Taking that into account is beneficial in understanding the debate over Second Amendment rights. Many Americans are wary about any change that would involve the government taking away their precious rights and becoming any more powerful than they already are. Others argue that reformation is necessary to ensure the safety of the

A main argument of theirs is that over the years, the Second Amendment has been largely misinterpreted. When the Constitution was being written, the need for weaponry was more prevalent. A militia needed to be equipped and ready at any time to protect the unstable country that America was. Now that we have moved past that point and we have a military to protect us, the need for militias has ceased and with it, the need for the Second Amendment (Cornell, 2012). People who agree with this standpoint often say that this amendment is allowing people to obtain semi-automatic machine guns, and other such weapons that are simply unnecessary and poses an imminent threat to the American

However, at some points, Americans need to come together and reach a compromise that would keep the society safe and put an end to the constant streams of mass shootings, homicide and other senseless acts of gun violence. It’s a ridiculous and saddening state of affairs we are in, but it is completely necessary to find a solution to save more American lives. After all, it is clear in the Constitution that sometimes individual rights must be sacrificed for the good of the public. The Second Amendment will likely remain a point on which Americans opinions widely vary, but the bottom line is that something has to be done to stop people with tendency to violence and crime from gaining access to guns, yet protect the rights of those who use guns