Sartre Analysis: Human Beings Are Forlorn

1027 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: sartre's human condition

Human Beings are forlorn Sartre argument is basically him saying that we choose to be who we are. That man has freedom to do what they please. Human beings can re-create ourselves, and choose what meaning life has. Sartre basically says that we are responsible for our own actions, because man is free. Man cannot blame morals or society for what actions man does. There are no excuses for what anyone does because man is condemned to be free. Man creates who they are. Therefore man is responsible for their own actions. Later on he explains that because man is free they are forlorn. He says, “Forlornness implies that we ourselves choose our being” (Sartre). Just by that quote he seems to say that we are forlorn because we choose who we are. Since …show more content…

One reason I agree is because without no god life does not have that deeper meaning that most humans search for. Without that deeper meaning there is a void in a person. Since there is a void in someone that leads them to unhappiness until they can find that deeper meaning they have been searching for. If someone cannot find deeper meaning from religion or a god then their life has no purpose. To some people that would be depressing, because then what do they shoot for in life? Some people would just sit there and not try, and others can go out and live it. For what would they be living for though? If there is no god and no afterlife a life of excitement is pointless, because then there is nothing after that fun. This makes it all pointless if someone went out and live it would be meaningless. Where is the meaning in life without something after life? Especially for those who do not leave an imprint in lives there life is completely meaningless, because even if they live their whole life living it with excitement when they will not be remembered or have mattered. If something does not matter that makes it meaningless therefore if someone does nothing that makes an impact they are meaningless. This makes their life meaningless because everything in their life serves no purpose. Even if they were good and did everything right while having fun. Without an afterlife or god that makes life meaningless. Even with the freedom that we have life without believing in a god is forlorn, because freedom is not happiness. Freedom is for us to be ourselves no matter what anyone or anything says. Even with that freedom of allowing us to be us. It still does not make anything better. We has humans are forlorn because we are who we are. Our choices and beliefs are what make us who we are. Therefore we are forlorn as

Show More
Related

  • Sartre And Beauvoir Existentialism Analysis

    1885 Words  | 4 Pages

    Addressing the critics of Existentialism was a necessity for both Sartre and de Beauvoir, as it was initially dismissed by many critics, such as the Communists and the Christians, as nihilistic or overly pessimistic. While understandable at a superficial level, Sartre and de Beauvoir challenged these critics to rethink their idea of existentialism and foster a deeper meaning of the philosophy of existentialism.

    Read More

  • The Human Condition: Contemplation Key to Understanding

    572 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ask the average American what the problems facing his country are, and you will get a battery of standard responses. Some people will say health care, others violent crime, and still others will say drugs. There will probably be some who complain of high taxes or express a need for gun control. Certainly, there is evidence to support the fact that these are all issues of great importance. However, these are only superficial, and there is a deeper problem that will not have a simple legislative solution. Americans have forgotten how to think critically. Hannah Arendt places great importance on living a contemplative life, and it is for this reason that her book, The Human Condition, is a worthwhile text. In it, she offers many insights as to what could help to make the American society better, and it is for this reason that she cannot be brushed aside.

    Read More

  • Human and Human Nature: Aristotle and Sartre

    2166 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...on their situation, and that for me seemed unfair. So for Sartre to show that humans can create their own lives, versus having it prearranged for them on some deeper level, seems much more appealing.

    Read More

  • Jean-Paul Sartre and Radical Freedom

    1790 Words  | 4 Pages

    Jean-Paul Sartre claims that there can be no human nature, or essence, without a God to conceive of it. This claim leads Sartre to formulate the idea of radical freedom, which is the idea that man exists before he can be defined by any concept and is afterwards solely defined by his choices. Sartre presupposes this radical freedom as a fact but fails to address what is necessary to possess the type of freedom which would allow man to define himself. If it can be established that this freedom and the ability to make choices is contingent upon something else, then freedom cannot be the starting point from which man defines himself. This leaves open the possibility of an essence that is not necessarily dependent upon a God to conceive it. Several inconsistencies in Sartre’s philosophy undermine the plausibility of his concept of human nature. The type of freedom essential for the ability to define oneself is in fact contingent upon something else. It is contingent upon community, and the capacity for empathy, autonomy, rationality, and responsibility.

    Read More

  • Early Sartre: Unsatisfactory Account of Alterity

    7833 Words  | 16 Pages

    This paper critically examines Sartre's treatment of the problem of alterity in his early works, arguing that his first philosophical work, The Transcendence of the Ego, presents an unsatisfactory account of alterity. The paper proposes that Sartre's study of imagination offers opportunities to re-examine the question of alterity and arrive at a more adequate formulation of the self's relation to the other. The paper begins by demonstrating that The Transcendence of the Ego perpetuates the Cartesian tradition of defining the self primarily in terms of self-consciousness and immanence. Next, the paper turns to Sartre's Psychology of Imagination to find another way of conceptualizing the problem. The paper argues that Sartre's theory of imaginary consciousness reduces the alterity of the imaginary object to sheer absence, and therefore does not allow us to bring the fundamental character of alterity to light.

    Read More

  • Grendel the Existentialist Monster

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    Now what is the reader to make of all this? A brief summary of Sartre's description of consciousness may help. According toSartre man exists on the level of being-in-itself(as a body in a world of objects) and on the level of being-for-itself(consciousness ). The key to understanding Grendel's view of the world is this distinction between the in-itself and the for-itself.Since, for Sartre, being-in-itself is uncreated(he can find no evidence of a creating God) and superfluous("de trop"), it reveals itself as a sort of absurd, meaningless outer reality. But being-for-itself, on the other hand, is the awareness that consciousness is not the being of the in-itself. Its being is revealed in a more paradoxical way-- as an emptiness in the center of being. How can it be aware of itself as an object?Impossible says Sartre. Simply put, the for-itself is the absence or the lack(thus Grendel's "lack") of the objectness of the in-itself . It reveals itself as the nothingness that remains when you realize that your consciousness is not an awareness of an object(such as your body), but rather an awareness of the lack of an object; or,to put it another way, it is an awareness of a nihilated presence.Grendel is proof that only an

    Read More

  • Jean-Paul Sartre’s Philosophy: Radical Freedom and Responsibility

    1238 Words  | 3 Pages

    When Sartre says, “We are left alone, without excuse. That is what I mean to say that man is condemned to be free” (Sartre 32), he is speaking of man’s autonomous life; which is human independence and freedom to will one’s actions. Because God, according to Sartre, did not create man we are self-creating. Through human intelligence comes essence, the intrinsic nature or indispensible quality of something, but essence only comes after human existence. Creating ones own essence allows man to be free because we create what we are, rather then our identities being given to us. The only guidance man gets is from themselves because man is left alone in the universe, which in-turn makes man responsible. Man has no one telling him what to do, there may be laws but they are man made and because they man made no one has true control over man.

    Read More

  • Plato's Allegory Of The Cave

    1521 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...ar idea with Stephen; they both wanted to do anything and create their own human nature, and our value of freedom through those free choices. Generally, Sartre suggested that men have freedom to construct their nature and essence through their actions.

    Read More

  • Comparison: Jean-Paul Sarte & Martin Buber's Theories

    1798 Words  | 4 Pages

    In order to explicate Sartre’s notion of intersubjectivity I will follow the progression that Sartre takes in Being and Nothingness. I will first distinguish between “being-for-itself” and “being-for-others”. Second, I will provide an explication of the subject’s encounter with the Other as an object. Third, I will explain the significance of “the look”. Here I will show how the look provides the foundation for the self. I will also show how the look of the Other affects the subject’s freedom.

    Read More

  • Existentialism By Jean-Paul Sartre: The Common Man's Meaning

    1287 Words  | 3 Pages

    Man goes through life, waking each day and participating in his own existence without truly existing. He is always in search of a greater meaning, and in the process fails to find one as he is on a constant search for something that cannot be grasped by the normality that is the human psyche. A similar example can be found in the capitalistic work force of modern day. Man works the majority of his life, always training and aiming for more, only to retire and live on a portion of what he was making. During his time working he lost out on his family, his sleep, often times his own enjoyment, for an ideal that often times is never achieved. This is a trivial situation, yet it is painted in a rather angelic light in our society. Why is it, then, that Sartre can be dismissed as trivial when trivialities exist in nearly every day to day life? Quite likely, this is because Existentialism is an “on-paper theory” so to speak, and in theory is looks quite differently than in reality. Man, as in this case, does not realise that he often follows the rules which he opposes. In addition, much of today’s society exists under a form of organized religion, a society with which Existentialism exists in

    Read More

  • Sartre: Authentic Existence in Living in Bad Faith

    311 Words  | 1 Pages

    We choose, act, and take responsibility for everything, and thus we live, and exist. Life cannot be anything until it is lived, but each individual must make sense of it. The value of life is nothing else but the sense each person fashions into it. To argue that we are the victims of fate, of mysterious forces within us, of some grand passion, or heredity, is to be guilty of bad faith. Sartre says that we can overcome the adversity presented by our facticity, a term he designs to represent the external factors that we have no control over, such as the details of our birth, our race, and so on, by inserting nothingness into it.

    Read More

  • Rejection of Existentialism

    823 Words  | 2 Pages

    In my opinion, much of Sartre’s ideas stemmed from his atheism. With the absence of a divine creator, he concluded that humans in themselves must be the start of all things. He rejected the idea that God could coincide with free will. While existentialism does raise some important and relevant points, its core that existence precedes essence is not a valid one, nor does a different view eliminate the possibility of free will.

    Read More

  • John Paul Sartre

    808 Words  | 2 Pages

    John Paul Sartre is known as one of the most influential philosophers of the twentieth century. He wrote many philosophical works novels and plays. Much of his work is tied into politics. The essay Existentialism is a Humanism is just one of his many works. Existentialism is a Humanism is a political essay that was written in 1945. Its purpose was to address a small public during World War II in Nazi occupied France. This essay stressed the public not to conform. Sartre introduced a great number of philosophical concepts in Existentialism. Two of these concepts are anguish and forlornness. They are simply defined, as anguish is feeling responsible for yourself as well as others and knowing that your actions affect others and forlornness is realizing that you are alone in your decisions. These two concepts are interwoven throughout the essay and throughout many of Sartre's other works. Sartre's view of anguish and forlornness in Existentialism is a Humanism addresses his view of life and man.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Fall By Albert Camus

    2761 Words  | 6 Pages

    “It is better to encounter your existence in disgust, then never to encounter it at all.” What Sartre is saying is that it is better to determine who you are in dissatisfaction, rather than never truly discovering yourself. Sartre’s worst fear in life would be to realize that you have never truly lived. For example, if you were to land a career that you were not interested in and you were just going through the motions of everyday life, Sartre would say that life was not a life worth living. Sartre’s goal in life was to reach the ultimate level; he said life was “Nausea” , because we are always trying to reach the next level, we are always in motion. Sartre had two theories that determine our way of life, Being-In-Itself and Being-For-Itself. Being-In-Itself is the ultimate level, if you reach this level you have fulfilled yourself completely, you have lived your life to the fullest. Being-For-Itself is where we as human beings are, we are always trying to work to become perfect. Our goal in life is to find an authentic existence, and we get there by saying no. Sartre’s philosophy of freedom is obtained by saying no, when we say no we are giving ourselves the option of what we do in our life. By saying no, we receive freedom of our life. “You should say no about every belief if there is a doubt about it.” Sartre also says our human existence is always in

    Read More

  • Compare and Contrast Three Major Philosophical Viewpoint

    1796 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...hat Sartre goes a little too far by saying that making a choice we are saying that humanity as a whole should be making the same choice. I think that he should have generalized his viewpoint by saying that every individual has their ideal “self” that they strive to be, but every once in a while we make choices that we regret. Like James said we all have choices of regret that we wish we could go back and change. If Sartre had said this in regards to his libertarian viewpoints, I would be in total agreement with him.

    Read More

More about Sartre Analysis: Human Beings Are Forlorn

Open Document