Carl Sandburg presents various examples of the destructive nature of war in his poem “Grass.” Primarily, he exemplifies time as a destructive force, covering up the carnage of war. In the first stanza of the poem, Sandburg writes “I am the grass; I cover all.” This line exhibits how natural forces such as time eventually obscure the havoc wreaked by catastrophic wars. This is the true horror of war—colossal massacres are perpetrated throughout history, and over time the true impact of these gruesome events is forgotten. This forgetfulness is exhibited in the poem when the train passengers ask the conductor “What place is this?// Where are we now?” Society often focuses only on the events currently occurring in the present, ignoring crimes committed in the past, as well as not heeding further destruction in the future. Throughout the entire course of the poem, Sandburg utilizes structure and imagery to support this idea of time as a destructive force. Sandburg’s structure reflects the chaos and confusion often left by war. Written in free verse, the poem contains no regular rhyme sche...
Over many centuries, Poetry and song has been a way for people to explore their feelings, thoughts and questions about War & Peace. Rupert Brooke's “The Soldier” and Cold Chisel’s “Khe Sanh” provide two different insights into the nature of war. . “The Soldier” conveys a message of bravery for soldiers to go into war and fight while “Khe sanh” conveys a message about post-traumatic stress and the horrible factors of coming back into civilization after war.
The powerful poem ‘Weapons Training’ showcases a sergeant, through malicious words, guiding his troops. However it is through ‘Homecoming’, where Dawe exposes the brutal hopelessness brought forth by the futility of war. Therefore it can be seen that war has an emotional toll on both families and the soldiers. Both poems have a recurring message that all war does is bring loss, death and mourning, showcasing Dawes strong opinions about a futile
Marked by two world wars and the anxiety that accompanies humanity's knowledge of the ability to destroy itself, the Twentieth Century has produced literature that attempts to depict the plight of the modern man living in a modern waste land. If this sounds dismal and bleak, it is. And that is precisely why the dark humor of Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. shines through our post-modern age. The devastating bombing of Dresden, Germany at the close of World War II is the subject of Vonnegut's most highly acclaimed work, Slaughterhouse-Five or The Children's Crusade: A Duty Dance with Death. Vonnegut's experience as an American POW in Dresden fuels the narrative that unconventionally defines his generation through the life and death of Billy Pilgrim. The survival of Billy Pilgrim at Dresden and his re-entry to the shell-shocked world reveal a modern day journey of the anti-hero. Vonnegut's unusual style and black satire provide a refreshing backdrop for a vehement anti-war theme and enhance his adept ability to depict the face of humanity complete with all of its beauty and blemishes. Likewise, Vonnegut adds his own philosophy concerning time, our place in it, and connection (or disconnection) to it and one other. Perhaps the most crucial step in understanding this intriguing work is to start with its title, which holds the key to Vonnegut's most prevailing theme.
This is the poem that Jim Northrup wrote about war. I am going to Explicate the poem and
Carl Sandburg's short poem "Grass" represents a metaphor for the disguise of history. The persona tells how histories that have taken place are sooner or later disregarded. The persona tells that the histories should not be disregarded, but be left the way it is as cited in the poem "I am the grass .Let me work." People should notice the events that took place and learn from their mistakes and be better people. The places that are mentioned in the poem are allusions. The allusions are indirect references that Carl Sandburg utilizes to exhibit the seriousness of the past events.
History has caused us, as the human race, to subconsciously assume that War is seen to be a product of death, destruction and hatred, a need to seek revenge on those who started the war. That, throughout time, war has been considered meaningful. Is War meaningful or is it better to be seen as meaningless? Were the three most well-known wars of history, World War 1, World War 2 and the Vietnam War, products of a meaningful event that inevitably killed thousands? Or do we need to realise that the only thing meaningful in regards to War, is the literature written by authors or poets who have experienced War and its devastating effects. That authors like Kurt Vonnegut, who wrote his literary classic “Slaughter House Five” in order to make people realise the true meaning behind war. That all war conveys is an attitude of selfishness and arrogance, a product of slavery and victimisation. This is also evident in not just “Slaughter House Five”, but in Joseph Heller’s novel, “Catch 22”. Both these two novels show different but similar viewpoints of war, by emphasising the concerns and ideas of the time periods in which these two novels were written. Today, you are joined with me, Sarah Day, here at the Brisbane
By specifically naming historical, and bloody, battles such as Austerlitz and Waterloo—proper nouns—the Grass’s experience is immediately uncovered. The Battle of Austerlitz took place in 1805, and the Battle of Waterloo took place in 1815, and the fact that the Grass is talking of them in the sense that it has dealt with the aftermath makes it seem timeless. Generally, those who are older are supposed to be respected, which supports the Grass’s superior nature. In addition, another concrete noun used by Sanburg in this poem is “grass,” where he writes “I am the grass; I cover all” (3). This word choice not only tells who is speaking, but it also reminds one that there is something above the aforementioned bodies, something that is responsible for covering them when they are left. Ultimately, Sanburg’s use of proper and concrete nouns stresses human inferiority to the Grass, a thing that has seen, lived through, and covered up the remnants of gory
...he Industrial revolution and the crisis of poverty. As I read the poem for the first time I attempted to recall those feelings as I was noticing the different literature terms used in the poem. These words to some are just words, to others though they are inspirational and life-changing words that will live forever, but what is ironic is that Sandburg had no idea if his works would be anything more than words on paper.
War and its ramifications for those who are unfortunately entangled in it, is an issue that has fueled both political discussion and literary exploration throughout the previous century. Underived, authentic accounts of the experience and effects of war, from those who have served in it, can be especially enlightening for the majority of society who have had the fortune of not being intimately familiar with war. Through the examination of poems and stories written by soldiers, who were inspired by their involvement in conflict, one can obtain a greater understanding of this gruesome aspect of life, without having to directly experience it. Similarly, soldier turned poet, Bruce Weigl, has contributed his perspective on war through his literary
Through reading this poem several times I decided that the message from the poem is that war is full of horror and there is little or no glory. Methods which I found most effective were Full rhyme and metaphor.
The three narratives “Home Soil” by Irene Zabytko, “Song of Napalm” by Bruce Weigl, and “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen all have the same feelings of war and memory, although not everyone experiences the same war. Zabytko, Weigl, and Owen used shifting beats, dramatic descriptions, and intense, painful images, to convince us that the horror of war far outweighs the devoted awareness of those who fantasize war and the memories that support it.
The physical effects of war overwhelm the naïve causing pain and suffering. Initially, war entangles the lives of youth, destroying the innocence that they experience as an aspect of their life. The girl “glid[ing] gracefully down the path” (1) and the boy “rid[ing] eagerly down the road” (9) have their enjoyable realities striped by the harshness of war. Likewise, war enters women’s lives creating turmoil. The woman who works “deftly in the fields” ( ) no longer is able to experience the offerings of life. The “wire cuts,” ( ) pushing her away from the normal flow of life. In addition, man undergoes tragic obstacles as a result of war. “A man walks nobly and alone” ( ) before the horrible effects of war set in on his life causing disruptions. War enters the life of man destroying the bond man shares with his beloved environment ( ).
Ginzburg insists that time cannot heal the wounds of war and that her generation, tied to war by its suffering and by its destiny, uncompromisingly carries the truth. She effectively uses all her rhetorical tools: repetitive imagery, fatalistic tone, and purposeful lack of organization, to show how war makes people lose their world forever.
Sassoon shows many examples of how the soldier in this poem gets pulled back into war-like terrors by meaningless things. The soldier is simply sitting in his home yet gets flashbacks of war and it haunts him. In this poem Sassoon is using a soldier as the example of repression as someone who has experienced war and the impacts it has on life after. “The poetic evolution related directly to Sassoon 's war experiences was initially gradual. His poetry became more serious and evocative in the early days of the war, but continued to inhabit the fatal logic of soldierly glory in poetic uniform” Avi Matalon claims (30). Poetry was influenced greatly by World War I and left poets creating new pieces that they never would have imagined
Carl Sandburg has been captivating reader’s attention since his first published poem in 1920’s(Baym 763). Sandburg understood the powerful use that literary devices play in literary works. He was known for using these devices to connect with readers, and implementing deeper themes into his works. He is one of the most famous poets for using these techniques. Nina Baym wrote that “Sandburg believed that the people themselves, rather than a cadre of intellectuals acting on behalf of the people, would ultimately shape their own destiny”(763). He shaped his literary work so people of all demographics could relate, and embedded different unique perspectives with literary device for people who