Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Meaning of marriage
Positive and Negative Consequences of Same-Sex Marriages
Positive and Negative Consequences of Same-Sex Marriages
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Meaning of marriage
Same-Sex Marriage Laws
State administrations, voters, and more lately the courts have made sweeping modifications to laws defining whether marriage is restricted to relations between a woman and a man or is extended to same-sex individuals. The status of same-sex marriage has been a contentious issue for a long time, even though several states recognize it. In 1993, the Supreme Court in Hawaii articulated that it could not prohibit same-sex marriages without a convincing reason. Even though gay marriages never took place in Hawaii, the decision caught national attention and sparked the passing of Defense of Marriage Act in more than forty states. The federal Defense of Marriage Act statute made certain that no state would be compelled to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states. This Act denies same-sex couples privileges and benefits accorded to heterosexual couples under the law (Hatzenbuehler, McLaughlin and Keyes 452). Electorates, the judicial system, and voters have made dramatic changes to the same-sex marriage issue through policy. Same-sex couples should be legalized in every state and accorded privileges and benefits given to heterosexual couples; because of its potential economic benefits, effect on institutional ethics and health outcomes but should be treated with caution because of its potential effects on offspring.
Legalizing same-sex marriage will generate a significant amount of revenue to the local and state economy; from marriage licenses, higher income taxes from penalties, and reduction in cost for state benefit programs. O’Neil, Mallory, and Badgett estimate that more than ten thousand same-sex couples will decide to get married in the three years after legalization in Georgia. Resident same-se...
... middle of paper ...
...ese marriages will provide access to social support and strengthen heterosexual marriages; gay couples will gain the right to use to the physical and psychological health benefits linked with the social support. This recognition will also mitigate the mental and emotional disorders caused by discrimination against same-sex marriages. Same-sex marriages should be legalized because of their immense economic benefits from wedding arrangements, tourism and taxes on homosexual weddings. Recognizing same-sex marriage will also reduce the discrimination and stigmatization accorded to homosexual relationships in several states. Section 2 of the Defense of Marriage Act which allows states that prohibit gay marriages and discriminate against same-sex individuals should be removed or amended to increase the mobility of homosexual and bisexual individuals within the country.
There are also the reasons why same-sex marriage is good for our economy and society. Very few individuals know this, however sanctioning same sex relational unions would give a huge monetary blast to both the private and open division. Individuals from the LGBT people group wish to wed for the same reasons we as a whole wish to get hitched, and should experience the same procedures in the event that they were permitted to wed. Part of these procedures is the money related
On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage across all 50 U.S. states with the ruling of Obergefell v. Hodges. They ruled that under the Fourteenth Amendment (which states “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”), same-sex married couples must be recognized as married and no state can
The U.S. has recognized marriage as a basic human right by many court cases including Loving v Virginia. Since protecting the marriage of a black-Cherokee woman and a white man, the case has also helped support the legalization of same-sex marriage in all 50 states. This is important because it creates a more united America by knocking down social constraints that disallowed the 5-10% of America identified as homosexual from being married. In the same way as blacks were not allowed to vote, gay couples were not allowed to marry. The legalization of same-sex marriage is helping bridge the split in social order of America by not outlawing same-sex couples for being “immoral” and implying the couples are less-deserving of marriage than a heterosexual relationship. The change of expanding the 14th amendment’s meaning of equal protection of rights for all citizens, in this case for marriage, is helping people treat each other as equivalent and allowing the country to take another step towards liberty and justice for
Throughout the recent history of America, gay marriage has always been an issue. With the different views and morals everyone has on the subject, it makes it hard for individual states to determine what side they should be on. In 1983 a Harvard Law School student, Evan Wolfson, wrote a thesis stating the rule of marriage equality. Justices concluded that gay couples were entitled to the legal benefits of civil marriage; and most crucially in the Supreme Judicial Court in Massachusetts, whose favorable ruling, in a suit by lawyer Mary Bonauto and the Boston-based Gay and Lesbian Advocated and Defenders, led to the nation’s first bona fide same-sex marriages…” (“Gay Marriage turns 10 and Credit Should Be Spread around- The Boston Globe). On May 17, 2004 Massachusetts became the first state to legalize gay marriages. In June of 2013, California legalized gay marriages, which helped their large LGBT (Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered) community. (“History and Timeline of the Freedom…”). When this finally happened, it was seen as a great achievement by Karmala Harris, a California Attorney. “This is a profound day in our country, and its just the right thing: ‘Justice is finally being served’” (“Court Gives OK for California Gay Marriages”).
During World War II and well after that brought many different social and political changes to the United States of America. One of the major changes was the discovery of homosexuality. In 1969 the Stonewall riots turned into a widespread protest for equal rights and acceptance. Homosexuality used to be considered a mental disorder by the American Psychiatric Association until 1973. According to an article by Elizabeth Ahlin, in 2000 an amendment passed in the state of Nebraska not allowing same-sex marriage and currently there is no campaign against this amendment (A1). The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) came about in 1996 and is a federal law that denies federal recognition of same-sex marriage and lets states refuse to recognize same-sex marriage in other states. Soon after this federal law three states adopted a same-sex marriage ban, these states include: Alaska in 1998, Nebraska in 2000, and Nevada also in 2000. Between the years of 2004 and 2006 same-sex marriage became legal in three different state, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Vermont. Ever since Connecticut legalized same-sex marriage on November forth one hundred and thirty-nine same-sex couples have been married there, and out of the one h...
Same-sex marriage inequality is an issue that has been troubling American society since the birth of our country. More recently, the United States Supreme Court has tackled some frequently raised arguments that deal with same-sex marriage and our constitutional rights. In the case US vs. Windsor, the legal question: “Does the Defense of Marriage Act [...] deprive same-sex couples who are legally married under state laws of their Fifth Amendment rights to equal protection under federal law?” The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) defines the term “marriage” under federal law as a “legal union between one man and one woman”. The ultimate ruling of the case US v. Windsor declared that Section Three of the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional. The social and economic effects of the decision was not universal in effect, and unfortunately, since states retain power to allow or deny same-sex marriages, over nine-million Americans are still being stripped of their rights.
...e Law suggested that Hawaii change its laws about same-sex marriages. They felt that gays and lesbians should be given the right to marry. Some were against this saying that heterosexual marriages were for the sole purpose of procreation; however there are many heterosexuals who choose not to have children. Should these heterosexuals not be able to be legally married either? The court decision on the marriages of gays and lesbians has had such a significant effect for Hawaii. Hawaii adopted a body of legislation granting equal rights to same-gender couples and their families (Hawaii). They did not allow them all the same rights and benefits as heterosexuals, but did grant most of them. Another state which changed some of its laws surrounding same-sex marriages is Vermont. In 1999, Vermont's Supreme Court ruled that the state legislature must either equalize benefits
Currently in the United States there is much legal and cultural activity surrounding the possibility of the legalization of "gay marriage". As of December 1995, a law case underway in Hawaii may lay the ground for legal recognition of same-sex unions. Such legal moves, as well as the efforts by lesbian and gay couples to be recognized as such, face denunciation from some conservative voices who assert that by nature and divine will only relationships between men and women can be considered "natural". And, to be honest, there is also an unease expressed by some lesbian and gay activists who, recalling the critique of patriarchy made by 1970's feminism, see "marriage" as an irretrievably heterosexual institution.
...ney by selling marriage licenses and along with that comes weddings, more selling houses, and more business. Especially since religion is supposed to be disassociated from state and the constitution there is no true reason why we cannot get rid of the traditional definition of marriage and make a change so that people who desire same-sex marriage can have their right to what they believe is marriage. Homosexuals should have the right to marry those of the same sex if that is what they so desire without having to be judged, discriminated against, or harassed just because of their sexual orientation. This controversial issue is making tremendous progress over the last century and it should result in granting homosexuals the ability to marry a person whom is the same sex without being treated differently from a straight person as they shouldn’t be viewed differently.
America is a country known for its freedom, yet people are told who they can and cannot marry. According to Kim Richards a case in Hawaii in 1993 where judges said the state’s constitution required a good reason not to give gay’s equal marriage rights. Congress was pushed to pass the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which prevented homosexuals who were allowed to marry from receiving the usual benefits of marriage, like taxes and retirement. In response states have made their stand on domestic partnerships and civil unions. DOMA was passed out of fear that a lawsuit filed in Hawaii would make them allow same sex marriage. The congress did not want to allow same sex couples the same benefits heterosexual couples receive while legally married (4-6). Opponents of DOMA claims it violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Full Faith and Credit Clause. By 2002, thirty-six states banned same-sex marriage or recognizing of same-sex marriage formed in other states (Richards 4-6). Benjamin Wittes says the uproar began in 1991 when Bill Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act, and liberals became upset claiming it was a contradiction to our free country (46-48). Dayton says Massachusetts was the first state to sign the bill to allow marriage equality in their state. While republican opponents win the legislative fight with twenty-one states denying marriage equality while just ten have granted the rights to homosexual couples. Polls have shown the majority of America, even including one of our most liberal states, California, remains against gay marriage. After the bill passing in Massachusetts in 2003, thirteen states passed anti-gay-marriage initiatives. Gay right activists are in hopes that states will not follow (...
Gay and lesbian unions have been for a long time a subject that no one liked to discuss. For the last few decades, gays and lesbians have come out and expressed their sexuality preferences. Many believe that same sex marriage should not be legalized because it's against the moral. It's against the definition of marriage, which is considered as the union of a man and a woman as a husband and wife. Same sex marriage should be legalized because the way society views the union of lesbian and gays can a change. Another reason why same sex marriage should be legalized is that children that are issued from a gay or lesbian couple will be loved and raised in a family that is legally recognized under the law. Lesbians and gays also deserve to have the same rights as heterosexuals.
... marriage is a controversial topic among today’s society. While the LGBT community fights for marriage equality, they feel inferior to those capable of being married. Same-sex marriage is not intended to harm heterosexual marriage or affect the function of society. Studies prove same-sex marriage would help the economy, as well as, government permitting, raise adoption rates. According to the First and Fourteenth Amendments; same-sex marriage is protected by the Constitution. Backing the Constitution are multiple marriage equality court cases. Same-sex marriage would end stigmatization of homosexuals and discrimination against them. There are over one thousand rights same-sex couples are denied of. Marriage equality and these civil rights would consider all men to be treated equal again. The future of marriage equality relies on the legalization of same-sex marriage.
In March 2005, a San Francisco Superior Court judge ruled on consolidated cases regarding same-sex marriage in California. The court held that the California ban on same-sex marriage violated the state constitution. The California Supreme Court unanimously agreed to review the decision of the appellate court, and it took its time in doing so. On June 3, 2008, the California secretary of state certified ballot proposition 8, which provided simply that: "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." Because of the court 's ruling, the State of California began legally performing same-sex marriages on June 16, 2008.In November 2011, the California Supreme Court ruled that state law did allow Prop 8 's supporters to defend it in court. Now only some states are Plowing gay marriage to be legal (Hanson). The defense of marriage act does not prohibit states from issuing same-sex marriage licenses, it set out to accomplish two key issues in regards to marriage. In its ruling, the Hawaii Supreme Court stated that a Hawaii law prohibiting same-sex marriage was unconstitutional and sent the case to a trial court in order to find out if the law could be upheld through compelling state interest. When the...
Firstly I will discuss the reasons for marriage equality. I argue marriage equality is in the best interest for family life. Allowing homosexuals to form stable committed relationships through marriage would allow for healthier homosexual relationships. You can’t prevent people from being homosexual however giving those people the right to marry can help them experience greater personal happiness. Studies have suggested that not only does legalizing marriage in an area generally make homosexual individuals in that area happier; it also makes them physically and mentally healthier and saves them money on health care (Hatzenbuehler, O’Cleirigh, Grasso, Mayer, Safren, & Bradford, 20012). I don’t see any compelling reason to take away the joy homosexuals get from marriage, this is one of the many reasons I support marriage equality.
The legality of gay marriage is a hot topic for many reasons. Traditionally marriage has been known as a legal bond between a man and a woman. Times have changed since those days. More and more people are coming out of the closet everyday. There are more gay people today than there ever have been and that number is only increasing. Marriage is a way for two people to show their commitment towards each other, so it should not matter what their gender or sexual orientation is.