More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction from a report on Australian identity
Introduction from a report on Australian identity
Introduction from a report on Australian identity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Both Banjo Paterson and Kevin Rudd successfully conveyed the use of distinctive voices in both texts Saltbush Bill J.P.(SBB)(1905) and the National Apology Speech(NAS)(2008).which create interesting views on society as they explore Australia’s identity through social and political constructs ,as well as exploring a range of different voices
In SBB , Paterson explores the impacts of social and political constructs which creates an interesting perspective of what society was like in the late 19th century. He reveals this through “they used to ‘take him oath’ and earn three sticks of plug a day” this establishes the distinctive voice of Paterson, the narrator, creating a colonial settlers point of view of the native indigenous population through the direct quotation ‘ take him oath’ suggests the vulnerability of the indigenous people, and how Saltbush Bill was able to manipulate them so that he could succeed in making his plan work to earn money so that he would be able to visit his sister. Saltbush Bill’s greed is
…show more content…
He uses the emotive language to explore how past parliaments have harmed society in the past, and wants to achieve a unified nation of australia through peace and justice . Rudd makes it evident through the collective pronouns “ we” how ,although he has power, he wants to create a national voice of australia through diversifying power in “ ...we honour...we
On April 19, 1995 two former US Soldiers blew up a the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, killing over 150 people. Bill Clinton, President of the United States at that time, wrote a speech where he shared his sympathy for the friends and family of victims and united the country through his use of parallelism, patriotic language, and inclusive wording.
Throughout the unit of reading to write, as a class we have studied multiple quality texts. These ranging from essays like George Orwell's and short stories like ‘There will come soft rains’. One text I have chosen to deepen my knowledge in is Stan Grant’s speech about the ‘Australian Dream’. I feel it is a well written and spoken speech with a deep and powerful meaning behind. Throughout the speech he uses various language techniques like rhetorical questions and repetition to convey his ideas about the ‘Australian Dream’. Stan Grant sets a serious tone to get across his particular issue about actions towards Indigenous Australians from everyday Australians.
The 2014 Walkley Award winning documentary, "Cronulla Riots: the day that shocked the nation" reveals to us a whole new side of Aussie culture. No more she’ll be right, no more fair go and sadly no more fair dinkum. The doco proved to all of us (or is it just me?) that the Australian identity isn’t really what we believe it to be. After viewing this documentary
The marginalised Australian experience traps groups and individuals based on one or many aspects of their life. Both the poem ‘capital letters’ by Omar Musa and Craig Silvey’s novel ‘Jasper Jones’ explore the Australian Experience of marginalisation. They share many aspects of marginalisation including racism, injustice, resilience, consequences and life on the margin. Marginalisation can have negative psychological and emotional responses, however in capital letters and jasper jones, the consequences of overcoming marginalisation and the build-up of resilience are emphasised. Omar Musa’s poem capital letters looks into his own life and experiences growing up on the margin in Queanbeyan, Australia. The poem displays both the harsh consequence, as well as the
The idea that indigenous Australian communities are underprivileged and do not receive the same justice that the white community accrues is represented through Jay Swan and his interactions with the corrupt white police officers and the indigenous locals of the town. My empathetic response to the text as a whole was influenced directly by way the text constructs these ideas as well as my knowledge of the way indigenous Australians are represented in the mainstream media and the behaviour of the police force as an institution. These contextual factors and the way Sen has constructed ideas influenced me to empathise with the indigenous
Vincent Lingiari and the Gurindji people who walked with him changed the Australian political landscape. Therefore, the ‘Wave Hill Walk Off’ proved an establishment to the liberation of Aboriginal people from the struggles for rights and
In response to his alleged affair with Ms. Monica Lewinsky, who at the time was an intern at the White House, President Clinton took to a national broadcast to clear his name. In his testimony, Clinton begins with a formal and slightly apologetic tone, and then subtly shifts the blame from his actions to the nosiness of the American public, victimizing himself. There were four different tone shifts in this particular speech, and he uses this to his advantage in turning the spotlight away from his private life, and to national issues. In his address, President Clinton uses a wide variety of rhetorical devices to convince his audience, the American people, that his stance on the matter is the most valid, and to reestablish his credibility,
"I ask that all Americans demonstrate in their personal and public lives... the high ethical standards that are essential to good character and to the continued success of our Nation."
House of Representatives. (1965, April 29). Retrieved March 16, 2014, from Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates: http://www.dva.gov.au/commems_oawg/commemorations/education/Documents/avw_topic1.pdf
Reynolds, H. (2005). Nowhere People: How international race thinking shaped Australia’s identity. Australia: Penguin Group
To understand Jackson’s book and why it was written, however, one must first fully comprehend the context of the time period it was published in and understand what was being done to and about Native Americans in the 19th century. From the Native American point of view, the frontier, which settlers viewed as an economic opportunity, was nothin...
Through numerous poetic techniques Paterson has shown that the Australian diversity is as diverse as the country itself. The Australian identity concerns the way Australia is viewed by other people. There are a variety of different aspects that contribute to this identity of Australia which include historical icons. Paterson recognizes how lucky we are to live on a land notorious for its diverse landscape. He is signaling that we are missing out and we need to cherish the great land we were given.
In this essay, the focus is driven towards the themes of ‘modernity’ and ‘tradition’ and how they are inextricably linked in the development of human rights, shaping the way Australia has transformed and evolved into a modern nation. Undoubtedly, the idea of modernity is attributed to the notions of ‘tradition’. By breaking down these notions through concepts of progress, we are able to link ‘traditions’ and ‘modernity’, showing how advancements in ‘modernity’ were met with conflicts in ‘traditions’.
Throughout both ‘Rainbow’s End’ and ‘The Rabbits’, the audience discovers the plights that the Aboriginal Australians faced, due to discrimination and assimilation, in intensely confronting, yet intensely meaningful ways. We see how the discrimination and forced assimilation of cultures was common in the lead up to modern times because of composers like Harrison, Marsden and Tan reminding us of these events, allowing us to discover and rediscover our past wrongs through their works, in order to pave the way for a brighter, harmonious future. Without these documentations and retellings of events such as these, history would repeat itself, conflicts would be more apparent and we as a species would not be able to thrive and prosper due to our prejudices and superiority complexes.
Paul Keating’s “The Redfern Address” is a text that allows responders to explore and understand the possibilities of belonging. The text is specifically aimed at helping non-indigenous Australians explore and understand the possibility of not belonging. This is communicated through the constant use of personal pronouns, e.g. ‘us’ or ‘we’, to direct the entire text at non-indigenous Australians like Keating.