Ruth Benedict Champion Of Ethical Relativism

846 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: How does ethical relativism differ from cultural relativism? and how they are related

Reflection Paper One: Benedict or Rachels?
Who do you think makes the better argument concerning the validity of ethical relativism - Benedict or Rachels?
“… [A] sophisticated understanding of the world must include an appreciation of… differences between cultures” (Rachels, 1986, p. 617). Spoken by Darius, King of Ancient Persia, this concept draws together the core of ethical relativism, “… different cultures have different moral codes” (Rachels, 1986, p. 617). Beyond the recognition of said unique moralities, which is defined as cultural relativism, ethical relativism challenges that those beliefs are, “… equally meaningful within their cultural contexts” (Rosenstand, 2018, p. 126).
This definition now understood, also begs that we look …show more content…

“Modern civilization, from this point of view, becomes not a necessary pinnacle of human achievement but one entry in a long series of possible adjustments” (Benedict, 1934, p. 34). Like the Ottoman Empire of the 13th Century, the Egyptians of 3000 B.C., Romans of the 117 A.D., these cultures, during their peak, were the best the world had to offer. However, morality does not necessarily equate to power and influence. As we know today, our perception of right and wrong has changed dramatically from the norms of these times. And the future from today will, hopefully, continue to progress even more positively. Therefore, Benedict’s argument that ethical relativism offers the belief that current beliefs held by each respective culture, for that time, is appropriate for them at that …show more content…

Essentially, it is easier for us to understand that the past was once different, as highlighted by Benedict, as this is true of our own, but does not seem to offer greater solidification for me. The perspectives offered are as unique as the authors, both extremely knowledgeable for their stand-points, but I find greater connection with Rachels. Further, I also feel Rachels highlights the strengths and weaknesses in a manner that allows readers to make-up their own conclusions. Benedict is clearly a supporter of ethical relativism, and leaves little room for addressing

Show More
Related

  • Ruth Benedict Ethics Are Relative Summary

    770 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Ruth Benedict’s “Ethics are Relative”, she argues that because morals and values change with time and across culture, there can be no solid judgment for any action to be consistently deemed “right” or “wrong”, since the same action will be viewed differently when considered from different points of view. Benedict’s primary assertion is that the ethics seen as good or bad by modern cultures are not better to those found in primitive cultures, but are the values we have developed over time. “Most of the simpler cultures did not gain the wide currency of the one which, out of our experience, we identify with human nature, but this was for various historical reasons, and certainly not for any that gives us as its carriers a monopoly of social

    Read More

  • Cultural Relativism: An Impediment to Critical Morality

    1079 Words  | 3 Pages

    Cultural Relativism is a moral theory which states that due to the vastly differing cultural norms held by people across the globe, morality cannot be judged objectively, and must instead be judged subjectively through the lense of an individuals own cultural norms. Because it is obvious that there are many different beliefs that are held by people around the world, cultural relativism can easily be seen as answer to the question of how to accurately and fairly judge the cultural morality of others, by not doing so at all. However Cultural Relativism is a lazy way to avoid the difficult task of evaluating one’s own values and weighing them against the values of other cultures. Many Cultural Relativist might abstain from making moral judgments about other cultures based on an assumed lack of understanding of other cultures, but I would argue that they do no favors to the cultures of others by assuming them to be so firmly ‘other’ that they would be unable to comprehend their moral decisions. Cultural Relativism as a moral theory fails to allow for critical thoughts on the nature of morality and encourages the stagnation

    Read More

  • Ethical Philosophies and the Hippocratic Physician

    1785 Words  | 4 Pages

    To the Moral Relativist, moral principles are created within cultures and communities, coming from cultural folkways and mores (Gerson Moreno-Riaño, personal communication). These principles are normative only in the culture which created them. Already, the Hippocratic Oath loses its moral weight. For example, in the 1973 Roe v. Wade abortion, Justice Blackmun dismissed the centuries-long Hippocratic tradition as merely a “Pythagorean manifesto,” relegating it to minority status (Cameron, 2001). However, relativism does not end here.

    Read More

  • Ethical Relativism By Louis Pojman

    1071 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many seem to have falling prey to the seduction of ethical relativism, because it plays in to their ethnocentric egoistic moral belief. Individuals such as Pojman are able to critically evaluate this moral principle and not fall victim like his or hers lay counter parts. We will attempt to analyze the theory of ethical relativism, by check the validity of this ethical theory, and evaluate its ethical concepts. With these procedures we will find if it is competent as an ethical principle to adhere by. Then evaluate Louis Pojman critique on ethical relativism and analyze does he successfully refute relativism position. We will also analyze objectivism; the ethical theory which Pojman erects in the place of ethical relativism.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Moral Relativism

    1083 Words  | 3 Pages

    Moral relativism maintains that objective moral truth does not exist, and there need not be any contradiction in saying a single action is both moral and immoral depending on the relative vantage point of the judge. Moral relativism, by denying the existence of any absolute moral truths, both allows for differing moral opinions to exist and withholds assent to any moral position even if universally or nearly universally shared. Strictly speaking, moral relativism and only evaluates an action’s moral worth in the context of a particular group or perspective. The basic logical formulation for the moral relativist position states that different societies have empirically different moral codes that govern each respective society, and because there does not exist an objective moral standard of judgment, no society’s moral code possesses any special status or maintains any moral superiority over any other society’s moral code. The moral relativist concludes that cultures cannot evaluate or criticize other cultural perspectives in the absence of any objective standard of morality, essentially leveling all moral systems and limiting their scope to within a given society.

    Read More

  • Cultural Relativism Analysis

    1805 Words  | 4 Pages

    The consequences of accepting cultural relativism Cultural relativists look at intercultural moral disagreement and argue there is no universally accepted ethical model because all judgements are relative. They believe moral utterances are truth-apt and determined by the majority of the group to which you belong. Cultural relativists claim that we should respect other cultures because our values are not morally superior, they are one set among many. Criticism is disrespectful because you can never completely understand the context of the ethical decisions within another culture. I argue that the consequences of accepting cultural relativism are objectionable.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Divine Command Theory

    1099 Words  | 3 Pages

    For many years now, people have always wondered what ethical principle is the right one to follow. These individuals are all seeking the answer to the question that the ethical principles are trying to clarify: What defines moral behavior? The Divine Command Theory and the theories of cultural relativism are two principles of many out there that provide us with explanations on what our ethical decisions are based on and what we consider to be our moral compass in life. Even though these two theories make well-supported arguments on why they are the right principle to follow, it is hard to pinpoint which one should guide our choices because of the wide array of ethical systems. Therefore, what is morally right or wrong differs greatly depending

    Read More

  • Nietzsche's Revaluation of All Values

    2292 Words  | 5 Pages

    We need a critique of moral values, the value of these values should itself, for once, be examined?. [What if] morality itself were to blame if man, as a species, never reached his highest potential power and splendour? [GM P 6]

    Read More

  • Cultural Relativism: The Conception Of Moral Codes

    677 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is no room for arrogance and we must always be tolerant of other cultures at all times, while also not placing our own moral code above others. Another key claim is that no one has the right to pass judgment on another society’s code since there is no objective standard to follow. It is a principle that rings much truth in the way of history and the present itself. A good example in history is the role the Nazis played in World War II. A cultural relativist would be inclined not to condemn the Nazis for the actions they carried out, if they were simply exercising their moral beliefs.

    Read More

  • Thesis Statement On Moral Relativism

    1003 Words  | 3 Pages

    Moral relativism is the concept that people’s moral judgement can only goes as far a one person’s standpoint in a matter. Also, one person’s view on a particular subject carries no extra weight than another person. What I hope to prove in my thesis statement are inner judgements, moral disagreements, and science are what defend and define moral relativism.

    Read More

  • Social Contract Theory and Cultural Relativism

    2200 Words  | 5 Pages

    Cultural relativism is perfect in its barest form. Even though many peoples have many different beliefs and many of these people believe that their own moral code is the only true one, who can say which is better than another? This is the struggle that cultural relativism sets out to permanently resolve. It seems as if cultural relativism could bring about natural equality among groups of differing beliefs. After all, no one belief can be qualified (attributed) as being superior or better than any other belief. ...

    Read More

  • Essay On The Challenges Of Cultural Relativism

    1459 Words  | 3 Pages

    The practices of many cultures are varied from one another, considering we live in a diverse environment. For example, some cultures may be viewed as similar in comparison while others may have significant differences. The concept of Cultural Relativism can be best viewed as our ideas, morals, and decisions being dependent on the individual itself and how we have been culturally influenced. This leads to many conflict in where it prompts us to believe there is no objectivity when it comes to morality. Some questions pertaining to Cultural Relativism may consists of, “Are there universal truths of morality?” “Can we judge

    Read More

  • Moral Relativism

    1958 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rachels, J. (1986). The Challenge of Cultural Relativism. The elements of moral philosophy (pp. 20-36). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Read More

  • Ethical Relativism

    1899 Words  | 4 Pages

    Part 1: The theory of Ethical Relativism a) An explanation of the claims of the theory of Ethical Relativism. Ethical relativism holds the position that there are no universal moral absolutes, and no moral right and wrongs, but instead, that right and wrong are based on social norms, the norms of one's culture. In other words, all points of view are evenly valid, and it's the individual that determines which is both true and relative for themselves. Ethical relativism hypothesizes that the truth is different for different people, not simply that different people consider different things to be true.[1] For ethical relativism, the prescriptive view is that different groups of people ought to have different ethical standards for evaluating acts

    Read More

  • Ethical Relativism and Cultural Relativism

    714 Words  | 2 Pages

    In explaining Cultural Relativism, it is useful to compare and contrast it with Ethical Relativism. Cultural Relativism is a theory about morality focused on the concept that matters of custom and ethics are not universal in nature but rather are culture specific. Each culture evolves its own unique moral code, separate and apart from any other. Ethical Relativism is also a theory of morality with a view of ethics similarly engaged in understanding how morality comes to be culturally defined. However, the formulation is quite different in that from a wide range of human habits, individual opinions drive the culture toward distinguishing normal “good” habits from abnormal “bad” habits. The takeaway is that both theories share the guiding principle that morality is bounded by culture or society.

    Read More

More about Ruth Benedict Champion Of Ethical Relativism

Open Document