Historical Essay: The role of internal and external forces in the collapse of the Tsar
“How important was political discontent in the outbreak of revolution?”
The Russian Revolution (1917) was a series of economic and social upheavals in Russia, involving first the overthrow of the tsarist autocracy, and then the overthrow of the liberal and moderate-socialist Provisional Government, resulting in the establishment of Soviet power under the control of the Bolshevik party.
The resignation of Nicholas II March 1917, in union with the organization of a temporary government in Russia built on western values of constitutional moderation, and the capture of control by the Bolsheviks in October is the political crucial opinions of the Russian Revolution of 1917. The actions of that historic year must also be viewed more broadly, however: as aburst of social strains associated with quick development; as a disaster of political modernization, in relations of the tensions sited on old-fashioned traditions by the burdens of Westernization; and as a social disruption in the widest sense, concerning a massive, unprompted expropriation of upper class land by fuming peasants, the devastation of outmoded social patterns and morals, and the scuffle for a new, democratic society.
Political revolution raises to a confusion where the government is either substituted or, the custom of government is changed by the property dealings are primarily left unharmed. A political revolution varies from the communal revolution where old party relations are reversed.
In society, revolt is typically caused by inequalities rendered by dishonest leaders or an immoral organization that represses the general public.
Revolution can also be initiated by the differe...
... middle of paper ...
...l liberties, supreme monarch rule, and ultimately a poor quality of life. In the end, the political factor responsible for the revolution was the people's discontent with Tsar Nicholas II and the way he ruled, socially the factor responsible for revolution was the people's desire for basic civil liberties which had not been granted by the monarch rulers, and economically the people wished to improve the quality of their life, working conditions, and job output.
It is very challenging to generalise around the thought of evolution. It is probable to approve on a working meaning of political revolution, to witnesstypes which tend to support the approaching of a revolution and to note the alterations that essentially occur to a society when a revolution takes place. Nonetheless revolutions occur eventuallywhich depends on the environment of the society one is seeing.
In this essay, the author
- Explains the role of internal and external forces in the collapse of the tsar. the russian revolution was a series of economic and social upheavals in russia.
- Analyzes the political crucial opinions of the russian revolution of 1917. the actions of that historic year must also be viewed more broadly as aburst of social strains associated with quick development; as a disaster of political modernization.
- Explains that a political revolution varies from the communal revolution where old party relations are reversed.
- Explains the role of internal and external forces in the collapse of the tsar. the russian revolution was a series of economic and social upheavals in russia.
- Analyzes the political crucial opinions of the russian revolution of 1917. the actions of that historic year must also be viewed more broadly as aburst of social strains associated with quick development; as a disaster of political modernization.
- Explains that a political revolution varies from the communal revolution where old party relations are reversed.
- Explains that revolt is typically caused by inequalities rendered by dishonest leaders or an immoral organization that represses the general public.
- Explains the economic problem in russia was there was not enough food as many soldiers did not even have guns as they were not being made.
- Analyzes how the entry of russia into world war i brought all the class tensions of russian society to a boiling point.
- Explains that the russian revolution ended with a monarch-controlled government and provisional government, and bolsheviks became the first communist country in the world.
- Opines that it is difficult to generalise around the thought of evolution. it is probable to approve on a working meaning of political revolution.
Harness the Power of AI to Boost Your Grades!
Haven't found what you were looking for? Talk to me, I can help!
Related
- analytical
- argumentative
- opinion
- explanatory
- The Russian Revolutionanalytical essayThe significant historical trend of rebellion against authoritarian rule in Russia is demonstrated through three key events; the 1905 Revolution, the February 1917 revolution and the October 1917 revolution. These events was a culmination of economic, social, and political forces which was driven by a deep dissatisfaction with inequality within society and incompetent leadership of Tsar Nicholas. The events of Bloody Sunday in 1905, as the massacre became known, started a movement that the government could not control and forced the Tsar to make some concessions, which did not last long. The further eroded public confidence in his government and in the view of the lack of the Tsar 's credibility were prepared the way for the 1917 Revolutions.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the 1905 revolution was a long-term cause of economic and political changes in russia. the peasants were forced to pay yearly redemption payments for the land they did not yet own.
- Analyzes how the personal style of tsar nicholas led to the 1905 revolution. he was a weak and incompetent leader, but was blind to his own faults.
- Analyzes how the february 1917 revolution demonstrates the trend of rebellion against authority. the tsar responded to the 1905 revolution by issuing the october manifesto and a duma.
- Explains that the 1905 revolution was a long-term cause of economic and political changes in russia. the peasants were forced to pay yearly redemption payments for the land they did not yet own.
- Analyzes how the personal style of tsar nicholas led to the 1905 revolution. he was a weak and incompetent leader, but was blind to his own faults.
- Analyzes how the february 1917 revolution demonstrates the trend of rebellion against authority. the tsar responded to the 1905 revolution by issuing the october manifesto and a duma.
- Analyzes the historical trend of rebellion against authoritarian rule in russia, which was driven by a deep dissatisfaction with inequality within society and incompetent leadership of tsar nicholas
1043 wordsRead More - Russian Revolution Essayanalytical essayThe Russian Revolution of 1917 was a rebellion of the Russian people against the rule of the Russian Empire. Russia was a country full of many unsatisfied people; the nation experienced a series of changes in the late 19th and 20th century that would ultimately bring about revolution. The Russian people were starving, industrialization was emerging and the middle class was asking to be a part of the ruling of the country. As a result of the revolution, Russia saw its withdrawal from World War I, major industrial growth and ultimately the spread Communism throughout the world. The inevitable causes of the Russian Revolution were the weaknesses of the Russian Empire, World War I and the collapse of the Tsar’s regime. The nation now began its path towards emerging as a world power following the revolution.
In this essay, the author
- Describes the 1917 russian revolution as a rebellion against the rule of the russian empire.
- Analyzes how the russian empire deteriorated before the revolution of 1917. it was plagued with poor communication, bad roads, and few railways. the beginning of the century brought great change throughout russia.
- Explains that the humiliating defeat of the russians by the japanese in the russo-japanese war of 1904 left an everlasting bad taste in russia's mouth.
- Describes the 1917 russian revolution as a rebellion against the rule of the russian empire.
- Analyzes how the russian empire deteriorated before the revolution of 1917. it was plagued with poor communication, bad roads, and few railways. the beginning of the century brought great change throughout russia.
- Explains that the humiliating defeat of the russians by the japanese in the russo-japanese war of 1904 left an everlasting bad taste in russia's mouth.
- Explains that russia entered world war i with vigor for the defense of serbia and the russian revolution of 1917.
- Analyzes how tsar nicholas ii made many mistakes that led to his downfall and the success of the russian revolution of 1917.
- Explains that the russian revolution was imminent due to the weaknesses of the empire, world war i and the tsar's mistakes in his years in power.
1255 wordsRead More - Russian Revolution Essayanalytical essayThe Communist Russian Revolution changed the course of history. In 1917, this revolution affected the country of Russia and the lives within it. I will be telling you about the people who acted as causes of the Russian Revolution. Those people include; Nicholas II (and his wife, Empress Alexandra), Rasputin, Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin. I will make connections between their actions, the outcomes, and how they influenced the Russian Revolution and affected the people of Russia.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the communist russian revolution changed the course of history and affected the country of russia and the lives within it. nicholas ii (and his wife, empress alexandra), rasputin, karl marx and vladimir lenin.
- Explains that nicholas ii was the last russian tsar, inheriting the throne when his father died of an illness. he married a girl named alexandra, formally known as princess alix of hesse-darmstadt.
- Analyzes how nicholas ii's unintelligent decision to act against his advisors and take command of the russian armies was the last straw and completely lost the people’s trust in the government.
- Explains that the communist russian revolution changed the course of history and affected the country of russia and the lives within it. nicholas ii (and his wife, empress alexandra), rasputin, karl marx and vladimir lenin.
- Explains that nicholas ii was the last russian tsar, inheriting the throne when his father died of an illness. he married a girl named alexandra, formally known as princess alix of hesse-darmstadt.
- Analyzes how nicholas ii's unintelligent decision to act against his advisors and take command of the russian armies was the last straw and completely lost the people’s trust in the government.
- Explains that rasputin was a powerful monk who claimed he was immune to poison, had healing powers, and could predict the future. when empress alexandra and nicholas ii's child had an illness called hemophilia, they were grateful to him.
- Describes how alexandra filled the government with people who only did harm to the russian government. many people saw rasputin as a conniving, deceitful peasant
- Analyzes how karl marx influenced the russian social democratic labor party, which publicly supported the overthrow of capitalism.
- Explains that vladimir lenin applied marxist ideas to persuade people that a "marxist system" with the bolsheviks leading, would be the ideal option rather than the capitalist
547 wordsRead More - A Comparsion of George Orwell´s Animal Farm and Russiaanalytical essayThe Russian’s were wrong in having hope for a reformed government. Following the careless Czar came Lenin and Stalin, both continuing the reign of terror that the Czar had left behind. Instead of a Czarist gover...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that joseph stalin was a selfish ruler who did everything possible even if his own people were in danger. he was an organized person and knew what his plans were, but the skills he gained while helping to organize the bolshevik party proved invaluable.
- Analyzes how orwell uses napoleon, who represents joseph stalin, in animal farm. napoleon disagreed with snowball with almost everything he said. he was clever and didn't care about his comrades.
- Analyzes how orwell's portrayal of joseph stalin as napoleon the pig shows that napoleon tries to control the animals on the farm at every cost.
- Explains that joseph stalin was a selfish ruler who did everything possible even if his own people were in danger. he was an organized person and knew what his plans were, but the skills he gained while helping to organize the bolshevik party proved invaluable.
- Analyzes how orwell uses napoleon, who represents joseph stalin, in animal farm. napoleon disagreed with snowball with almost everything he said. he was clever and didn't care about his comrades.
- Analyzes how orwell's portrayal of joseph stalin as napoleon the pig shows that napoleon tries to control the animals on the farm at every cost.
- Analyzes how george orwell portrays napoleon as joseph stalin in animal farm. the brutal living conditions of russians during czar nicholas ii and stalin's reign led them to completely lose faith in their leaders.
961 wordsRead More - The French and Bolshevik Revolutionsargumentative essayRevolutions are a prevalent part of world history and have shaped our world into what it is today. The French and the Bolshevik revolutions serve as just two examples of the many revolutions throughout history that have brought about changes to their respective countries. Both of these revolutions had distinct causes and were stimulated by other revolutions in the past. Since these two revolutions happened many years apart, with the French Revolution in the late sixteenth century and the Bolshevik Revolution in the early twentieth century, the ideologies behind them were somewhat different. The people went the extremes in both countries to bring about the desired changes. The revolutions were both radical because of the shortage of food and the uprising of the people. In both revolutions, there is a quest for change and the citizens were willing to go as far as they needed to go to make that change, even if it meant the people had to overthrow their leaders.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the french and the bolshevik revolutions are examples of the many revolutionary movements throughout history that have brought about changes to their respective countries.
- Explains that the french and bolshevik revolutions were brought about by several factors. the french revolution was caused primarily by the enlightenment and national debt.
- Compares the ideology behind the french and bolshevik revolutions, stating that the people were unhappy with the current government and wanted change.
- Explains that the french and the bolshevik revolutions are examples of the many revolutionary movements throughout history that have brought about changes to their respective countries.
- Explains that the french and bolshevik revolutions were brought about by several factors. the french revolution was caused primarily by the enlightenment and national debt.
- Compares the ideology behind the french and bolshevik revolutions, stating that the people were unhappy with the current government and wanted change.
- Opines that the french revolution is more extreme than the bolshevik revolution because it changed the structure of the country.
- Explains that the bolshevik revolution was more radical than the french revolution because the citizens had already taken drastic measures to remove czar nicholas ii from power.
- Explains that revolutions are drastic measures taken to make a change. the french, seeking political change, were willing to defy their king and follow the lead of other men who pointed the way.
- Analyzes how the french and the bolshevik revolutions are examples of how far citizens will go for their personal well-being and a change in government and economy.
- Describes the causes and processes of the russian revolution and bolshevik victory.
- Explains schulz, gerhard, sutherland, donald m.g., the french revolution and empire: the quest for a civic order.
1616 wordsRead More - ... food making it into the cities and towns and the little food that was already there was now overly expensive due to inflation. There was trouble in the countryside, peasants had started demanding land in order to grow their own food to survive. The people in Russia were fed up with how things were going and were ready for a revolution.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the first world war played the biggest role in the fall of the three hundred year old romanov dynasty.
- Analyzes how the tsar and his people eased from the extreme burst of patriotism during the war, but by the fall of 1915 russia had started its decline.
- Explains that the tsar became the new commander-in-chief after russia's removal from poland. the brusilov offensive was a success but the army was facing serious shortages of materials and morale.
- Opines that the first world war played the biggest role in the fall of the three hundred year old romanov dynasty.
- Analyzes how the tsar and his people eased from the extreme burst of patriotism during the war, but by the fall of 1915 russia had started its decline.
- Explains that the tsar became the new commander-in-chief after russia's removal from poland. the brusilov offensive was a success but the army was facing serious shortages of materials and morale.
- Explains that when the tsar left and made alexandra in charge was when siberian monk gregory rasputin had his main influence on russia.
- Opines that russia was fed up with the war and was ready for a revolution.
- Opines that the first world war was the main cause for the fall of the romanovs in 1917.
642 wordsRead More - Russian Revolution Causesopinion essayThere are many reasons as to why the Russian Revolution began. But the primary cause that inevitably led to the ultimate start; peasant unrest. Although peasants had been freed from serfdom in 1861, there were still strict social class divisions that deprived them from many opportunities. Peasants were still dependent on large land owners from economic support. But the problem was that many peasants wanted the ability to own their own land. Some of the problems could be blamed on Tsarist rule. Tsar was the ruler of Russia during the Russian Revolution; His rule was absolute and believed his right to rule came from god. He was also unwilling to allow any democratic reforms, and had some responsibility in the Bloody Sunday massacre. The primary cause of the Russian Revolution was peasant unrest due to the deformity of their social class and lack of sources to help their social class survive.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the primary cause of the russian revolution was peasant unrest due to the deformity of their social class.
- Explains that peasants suffered from land shortages, periodic hunger, high incidence of disease and early mortality, and the burdens of taxation and rents.
- Explains that the emancipation was a drastic change for the peasants, but they were taken advantage of because of the legislation that governed the process.
- Opines that the primary cause of the russian revolution was peasant unrest due to the deformity of their social class.
- Explains that peasants suffered from land shortages, periodic hunger, high incidence of disease and early mortality, and the burdens of taxation and rents.
- Explains that the emancipation was a drastic change for the peasants, but they were taken advantage of because of the legislation that governed the process.
- Opines that bloody sunday was one of the most dreadful and unreasonable massacres for the peasants.
- Opines that tsarist rule led to the russian revolution, but most believe it was due to peasant unrest.
- Explains that peasant unrest was the main cause of the russian revolution because their cause spread throughout russia and started a widespread revolution.
902 wordsRead More - World War I: The Primary Cause of the Russian Revolutionanalytical essayThe Revolution was brought by military defeats and starvation during World War I, which started problems in the battlefields. The war did not progress well for Russia because supplies to the Russian capital deteriorated significantly. The demands of waging war exhausted the Russian economy and exposed the restrictions of the Russian manufacture. All the combatants in World War I suffered scarcities and prov...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that russia's overthrows and shortage caused revolutionary upheaval and massive inflation, which led to deprived infrastructure.
- Explains that the russian revolution was brought by military defeats and starvation during world war i, which started problems in the battlefields.
- Analyzes how the workers in the cities worked for long hours in awful conditions, which stressed the basic infrastructure of russia and its underprivileged economic system.
- Explains that russia's overthrows and shortage caused revolutionary upheaval and massive inflation, which led to deprived infrastructure.
- Explains that the russian revolution was brought by military defeats and starvation during world war i, which started problems in the battlefields.
- Analyzes how the workers in the cities worked for long hours in awful conditions, which stressed the basic infrastructure of russia and its underprivileged economic system.
- Analyzes how world war i led to russia's revolutionary upheavals during 1917. tsar nicholas ii took matters into his own hands and took over as commander in chief.
- Explains that the russian revolution began due to the soldierly losses and limited provisions during world war i. the war led tsar's military control to its breaking point.
1107 wordsRead More - The Revolution in Russiaanalytical essayA useful way of understanding the course of the Russian Revolution in 1917 is to compare it to a wildfire. In this metaphor, the instability of late Imperial Russia and the deep dissatisfaction of large segments of its population provided plentiful fuel for the fire that was sparked by the disastrous course of the First World War. Although the vast majority of the population was initially cheered when the Imperial government went up in flames, moderates soon began to worry that they too would be consumed if the blaze was allowed to spread. Their caution backfired, however, as they gradually lost the respect and trust of the population. As their authority broke down, the inferno spread out of control, benefiting radicals willing to go along with the growing anarchy and support the demands of the people. The militant Bolshevik Party was the group best able to ride the firestorm into power, which they seized in the famous October Revolution. They went along with the revolution until it burned itself out, and were then able to consolidate their position as the absolute rulers of the country.
In this essay, the author
- Explains the destabilizing force of the industrial working class, which was clustered around the centres of power in the largest cities of imperial russia.
- Explains how the breakdown of the provisional government in petrograd led to a massive peasant revolution in the countryside.
- Analyzes how the bolsheviks defeated their opponents in a long and bloody civil war because of their rhetorical commitment to workers' control of industry and soviet power.
- Explains the destabilizing force of the industrial working class, which was clustered around the centres of power in the largest cities of imperial russia.
- Explains how the breakdown of the provisional government in petrograd led to a massive peasant revolution in the countryside.
- Analyzes how the bolsheviks defeated their opponents in a long and bloody civil war because of their rhetorical commitment to workers' control of industry and soviet power.
- Explains that durnovo's memorandum in frank golder, documents of russian history, 1914-1917 (new york: the century company, 1927), 19
- Cites lazar volin's a century of russian agriculture: from alexander ii to khrushev.
- Cites n.n. sukhanov's the russian revolution, ed. joel carmichael.
- Explains the communist party of the soviet union's history, published by foreign languages publishing house.
- Compares the russian revolution in 1917 to a wildfire. the instability of late imperial russia and the deep dissatisfaction of large segments of its population provided plentiful fuel for the fire.
- Explains that the peasantry, industrial workers, and progressives were deeply dissatisfied with the government's ineffective and weak institutions.
- Explains that the socialist revolutionaries and social democrats were the most important socialist groups in late imperial russia. both factions considered the peasantry reactionary and doomed to disappear.
- Explains that the russian revolution was a product of the first world war. the outbreak of war in august 1914 inspired patriotism and decline in strikes, protests, and revolutionary activity.
- Explains that the provisional government and the petrograd soviet were created to fill the vacuum left by the revolution and collapse of the autocracy.
- Explains that the war proved controversial and was the basis for several crises that rocked the capital in 1917.
- Explains that the russian revolution had reached full blaze, literally as well as metaphorically. only groups able to thrive in the firestorm were those willing to go along with the growing anarchy and support the demands of the people
- Analyzes how the bolshevik party, originally a tiny sect, saw its popularity and membership rise as the country was polarised in april and may.
- Quotes leon trotsky in orlando figes' a people's tragedy: the russian revolution 1891-1924, and richard pipes' russia under the bolshevik regime.
- Explains the russian calendar, which was thirteen days behind that used in the west during 1917.
3791 wordsRead More - Essay On The 1905 Revolutionargumentative essayfuture leader of the Soviet Union as a “dress rehearsal” for the 1917 revolution. The most important difference is that the 1905 revolution failed to destroy the autocracy in Imperial Russia. A combination of reasons can explain why this revolution failed at overthrowing the Tsar Nikolas the Second. The revolutions participants were not revolutionaries that wanted to overthrow the Tsar, it was not started by revolutionary groups. The military and military context played an important role to the revolution’s failure, and the autocracy’s reforms gave compromise to the protestors who could be satisfied with the changes. These factors show why the 1905 revolution failed to destroy the autocracy.
In this essay, the author
- Explains why the 1905 revolution failed to destroy the autocracy in imperial russia. the military context played an important role to the revolution's failure.
- Analyzes how the 1905 revolution was fuelled by the bloody sunday massacre and the december insurgency.
- Explains that the military remained loyal to the autocracy and the tsar even after the russo-japanese war.
- Explains why the 1905 revolution failed to destroy the autocracy in imperial russia. the military context played an important role to the revolution's failure.
- Analyzes how the 1905 revolution was fuelled by the bloody sunday massacre and the december insurgency.
- Explains that the military remained loyal to the autocracy and the tsar even after the russo-japanese war.
- Opines that the russo-japanese war was a defeat from the battles the russians lost, but it was not the most unpopular war that imperial russia will participate in.
- Explains that the autocracy's efforts to stop the industrial strikes in october 1905 with the creation of the duma were successful and satisfied the workers and the peasants.
- Explains that the reforms aimed at the peasantry seemed like a whole load of good for them. a law cancelled the redemption payments in november of 1905.
- Explains pyotr stolypin's peasant reforms were a way to'reorganize russia' and serve as the barrier to revolution.
- Explains that the reforms allowed peasants to sell their land and leave the village, which paved the way for social movement and the establishment of land as a commodity.
- Concludes that the 1905 failed to destroy the autocracy because that is not what it intended to do. the revolution was to receive more civil liberties, and to be granted better working conditions.
1429 wordsRead More - Changes Brought by The Russian Revolutionexplanatory essayNicholas was considered a selfish ruler with no love for his very own people. Nicholas was forced to give up his throne by a strike that broke out in Petrograd on March 1917(Kindersley). After Nicholas getting forced out of his throne a party called The Mensheviks formed a govern-ment made up of revolutionary’s but failed. The Bolsheviks came right after seeking to enforce Marxism and gain power. The Czar Family were arrested and all killed after a year,
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the russian revolution made a huge change for the best for its people. with world war l taking place and russia being involved many russians were being killed by the germans.
- Explains that nicholas was a selfish ruler with no love for his very own people. he was forced to give up his throne by the petrograd strike in 1917. the bolsheviks tried to enforce marxism and gain power.
- Explains that the bolsheviks were led by vladi-mir lenin who believed in the ideas of karl marx and marxism.
- Explains that the russian revolution made a huge change for the best for its people. with world war l taking place and russia being involved many russians were being killed by the germans.
- Explains that nicholas was a selfish ruler with no love for his very own people. he was forced to give up his throne by the petrograd strike in 1917. the bolsheviks tried to enforce marxism and gain power.
- Explains that the bolsheviks were led by vladi-mir lenin who believed in the ideas of karl marx and marxism.
- Opines that karl marx created the ideas of communism. he died before he could see his vision put to work and be enforced by the bolsheviks.
- Analyzes how lenin wrote a book expressing that marxism's goals was to give freedom to the people of russia.
- Explains that the bolsheviks took part in the october revolution on november 7, 1917. the cruiser aurora fired blanks along the neva river at the menshers headquarters and attacked im-portable buildings in petrograd to gain control.
- Explains that the bolsheviks made it clear that peasants must take all land from the landholders. the pro-duction of bread and meat was increased for the people.
- Explains that lenin established the red army and eliminated all political opposition. the whites were against the bolsheviks ide-as.
- Explains that lenin wanted investments to be made on russia in order to better the life in russia. the historical events with the bolsheviks and the russian revolution shaped up today's russia
- Explains that the bolsheviks believed that marxism was the solution to all of russia's problems to better the country and the world.
785 wordsRead More - Revolution: The Rise of the Soviet Stateanalytical essayThe beginnings of the Soviet Union can be traced back far into Russian history. This paper, however, will focus on the revolutions in 1917 and the following handful of years and how these formative years had a major impact on the lives of millions of people, not only in Russia, but across Europe and indeed the entire world. The formation of the first socialist country in the world was going to be the beginning of a utopian state for the Russian people. What it was, however, was the beginning of reclassifications and the reemergence of old ideas thought to have been put asunder by previous generations. The February Revolution, The Bolshevik Revolution, and War Communism have proven to be some of the most important invents and practices in recent human history.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the revolutions in 1917 and the following handful of years had a major impact on the lives of millions of people. the february revolution, the bolshevik revolution and war communism are some of the most important invents and practices in recent human history.
- Explains that the february revolution began on women's day in the capital of petrograd, present-day st. petersburg, and was largely contained to the city and parts close by.
- Explains how the provisional government and petrograd soviet ruled together for a brief period before revolution ravaged the country. gross industrial production had decreased by nearly fifty percent from the year before.
- Analyzes how the revolutions in 1917 and the following handful of years had a major impact on the lives of millions of people. the february revolution, the bolshevik revolution and war communism are some of the most important invents and practices in recent human history.
- Explains that the february revolution began on women's day in the capital of petrograd, present-day st. petersburg, and was largely contained to the city and parts close by.
- Explains how the provisional government and petrograd soviet ruled together for a brief period before revolution ravaged the country. gross industrial production had decreased by nearly fifty percent from the year before.
- Analyzes how the provisional government was having none of this, which angered the russian citizenry even more. declining to distribute the lands evenly, the peasants took matters into their own hands.
- Explains how lenin convinced the bolshevik leadership to rebel against the provisional government. with momentum on their side, they overthrow petrograd and become leaders of the country.
- Explains that war communism brought about several new policies and practices to the newly formed soviet state, including nationalization of all industries, state control of foreign trade, rationing of food and most commodities, and private enterprises became illegal.
- Concludes that the february revolution, the bolshevik revolution and war communism were important events in the history of the soon to be soviet empire.
894 wordsRead More - French and Russian Revolutionsexplanatory essayIn 1905 , Russia had a prerevolution that was put down of the Czar. Instead of learning from this prerevolution, Czar Nicholas II, made a very big mistake by in not introducing some reforms to correct the problems. So because of his actions, the situation grew worse. In 1917, the Russians were fighting in World War I. A good majority of the Russian people were weary and uncontent with the way the war was going and with the Czar's rule. This uncontent along with economic hardships caused riots and demonstrations to break out. The Czar called for the army to put down the revolution as they did in 1905. But the army joined the revolt and the Czar was kicked out of power soon afterwards. A temporary government was set up to decide on what kind of government Russia was gonna set up. Two political parties were set up. The Bolsheviks were one of the two. The leader of the Bolshevik party was a man named Lenin. Lenin was a firm believer of the theories and ideas of Karl Marx. So with his slogan of "Bread, Peace and Land", Lenin gained the support of the peasants and gained control of Russia and setup a communist state.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that both the french and russian revolutions occurred because of two main reasons: bad leadership and a bad economy.
- Describes how czar nicholas ii's actions led to a pre-revolution in 1905, when the russians were fighting in world war i. the army joined the revolt and lenin was kicked out of power.
- Explains that the french revolution was also caused by a bad ruler and an out-dated tax system which only taxed the poor.
- Explains that both the french and russian revolutions occurred because of two main reasons: bad leadership and a bad economy.
- Describes how czar nicholas ii's actions led to a pre-revolution in 1905, when the russians were fighting in world war i. the army joined the revolt and lenin was kicked out of power.
- Explains that the french revolution was also caused by a bad ruler and an out-dated tax system which only taxed the poor.
- Describes how the bastille incident set off revolts all over france and louis was soon deposed afterwards. a doctrine called the declaration of the rights of man and citizen served as a basis for the revolutionary french leaders.
- Explains that both the french and russian revolutions had similar causes but ended up with different results. both countries had different internal factors which cause the results; czar nicholas ii and king louis xvi were executed soon after the revolutionaries took power.
569 wordsRead More - The Iranian Revolution and the Russian Revolutionargumentative essayWood, A. (1986). The Russian Revolution. Seminar Studies in History. (2) Longman, p 1-98. ISBSN 0582355591, 9780582355590
In this essay, the author
- Compares the ideologies of lenin and khomeini, stating that both revolutions opposed bourgeoisie extravagance and class inequality, and invoked a strong sense of nationalism to overthrow capitalism.
- Concludes that the russian and iranian revolutions were born out of mass social and political unrest due to an incompetent monarch who had lost touch with his people.
- Explains wood, a., the russian revolution, seminar studies in history, longman, p 1-98.
- Compares the ideologies of lenin and khomeini, stating that both revolutions opposed bourgeoisie extravagance and class inequality, and invoked a strong sense of nationalism to overthrow capitalism.
- Concludes that the russian and iranian revolutions were born out of mass social and political unrest due to an incompetent monarch who had lost touch with his people.
- Explains wood, a., the russian revolution, seminar studies in history, longman, p 1-98.
- Compares iran's 1979 religious uprising with the russian revolution of 1917 and outlines the major differences and similarities between the two.
- Analyzes how the shah attempted to appear as an old-fashioned absolute monarch while at the same time trying to deal with the rapid modernisation of iran.
- Explains harding's the russian revolution: an ideology in power. akhavi, s. and parsa, m.
- Cites cassier, m., lafraie, najibullah, and ludwig, p.
1667 wordsRead More