Rubisco

968 Words2 Pages

The important role of Rubisco in the process of CO2 fixation with the impact on crop yield had the attention of many research groups who started to generate hundreds of Rubisco mutants and compared all known sequences to understand the basics of CO2 affinity and enzyme activity kinetics in different organisms with respect to the overall structure of Rubisco holoenzyme. Sharwood et al examined the catalytic properties of a hybrid Rubisco that contains L subunits from sunflower and S subunits from tobacco (Sharwood et al. 2008), this hybrid enzyme was stable and kinetically equivalent to both sources without any structural difference. Their study indicated that the conservation of the L subunit active site between tobacco and sunflower was the important part of having equivalent kinetic properties in the hybrid. Because the L subunit contains the active site, interaction with the CO2 substrate was not affected even though the overall conformation of Rubisco was affected by the S subunits. Since the first L subunit sequence was produced (McIntosh, Poulsen, and Bogorad 1980), a big number of sequence data has become available in the genebank. Sequence alignment and comparison shows that there is no length variation in the L subunit of Rubisco between species (Kellogg and Juliano 1997). In L subunit, the highest conserved region is the active site, where carboxylation and oxygenation reaction occur, and the majority of conserved amino acid residues are within the α/β barrel. This conservation is consistent with the data from mutagenesis studies that indicate catalytic changes of Rubisco when substitutions occur in this region. All Rubisco and Rubisco-like sequences are closely related; Tabita et al have classified the Robisco and Rubis... ... middle of paper ... ...nding to CO2 and in the same time, changes in the loop-6 flexibility during the reaction (figure X1). Satagopan et al have used both random and site-directed mutagenesis to identify O2 sensitivity in Cyanobacterial Rubisco (Satagopan et al. 2009). Satagopan group used E. coli system in their screening and found that D103V mutant resulted in growth suppression of E. coli, while A375V mutation had an intergenic suppressor affect on Rubisco. The change from Ala residue to Val resulted in decreased enzyme sensitivity to O2 but did not affect the specificity of Rubisco to either O2 or CO2 (Satagopan et al. 2009). Most changes of conserved residues between species have shown their critical role in catalysis, specificity and reaction kinetics, while non-conserved residues substitution experiments showed more structural changes that affected the assembly of the holoenzyme

Open Document