Royal Ontario Museum Crystal Extension Summary

2581 Words6 Pages

Through the study of language in architecture, meaning is derived from signs and signifiers of which the human mind associates with programmatic identity, contributing to the viewer’s ability to interpret the thought and design process behind a buildings form, planning and aesthetic features . The case study of The Royal Ontario Museum Crystal Extension by Daniel Libeskind in 2007, Toronto, Canada, will be used to investigate the relationship of architectural language between the original and the new building. In particular, this paper examines the juxtaposition of two distinctly different styles of architecture and their ability to be read harmoniously as one and if this is a successful method for creating meaning, in reference to Robert Venturi’s …show more content…

Libeskind’s form of the crystal extension acts as a signifier from which the viewer derives meaning from regarding the function of the building, due to the form itself limiting the program of the interior as seen (fig.5) . Libeskind’s post-structuralism style of architecture continues to play Jacques Derrida and Peter Eisenman’s notion of experiencing absence, seen in many of his earlier projects such as the Jewish Museum . Libeskind plays with the viewer’s perception of a typical wall, by eliminating every right angle and straight wall. The void and solid binary is played on throughout the crystal, creating void where each of the crystalline volumes intersects creating glimpses of the next exhibition before moving into. Designing an experience that most viewers do not associate with past museums, with libeskind focusing on the experience of the interior communicating confrontation . However, when designing the exterior of the building Libeskind moves away from past ideals seen in the Jewish museum where he uses indexicality to communicate meaning. The Crystal Extension and other projects such as the Denver Museum suggest that the symbolic predominates over the indexical and diagrammatic nature of his earlier work. This new work then becomes …show more content…

Through this history of re-use, adaption, subversion and inversion the intervention of meaningful fragments creates a more relevant meaning. Tmesis is an original feature of Ancient Greek language, requiring both a compound structure (absolutely) and an interposed fragment (bloody), to create a relationship, which emphasis greater meaning on the original intended meaning. In return creating an accentuation of the compound and fragment relationship (abso-bloody-lutely) . Tmesis can be applied to architecture in two fields of subversion and insertion, allowing a new method of reading the structures language and their enhanced meaning. A current example of the method of Tmesis is in the Caxia Forum, Madrid by Herzog and De Meuron, through the hollowing of a nondescript and unused electric power station and implanting the insertion of a museum. The architectural heritage of the power station was listed, whilst at ground level the existing stonework is separated from the now floating brick, through a Tmesis sculptural insertion, in return creating an entrance to the museum. Through this Tmesis insertion a simultaneous meaning is created between the industrial power station and the museum, accentuating the meaning of the structure and its function

Open Document